• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在重症监护环境中,对直接观察者与参与高保真模拟教育的主动参与者的任务负荷进行测量。

Measured task load in directed observers versus active participants undergoing high-fidelity simulation education in a critical care setting.

作者信息

Devlin-Hegedus Jessica, Miller Matthew, Cooke Sean, Ware Sandra, Richmond Clare

机构信息

Wollongong Hospital Wollongong New South Wales Australia.

NSW Ambulance Rozelle New South Wales Australia.

出版信息

AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jul 11;7(4):e10894. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10894. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/aet2.10894
PMID:37448628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10336023/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The use of directed observers in high-fidelity simulation education is increasingly common. While evidence suggests similar educational outcomes for directed observers compared to active participants in technical skills, it remains uncertain if this benefit also exists for senior clinicians, especially in mental workload. We sought to compare the workload between active participants and directed observers using an objective measure.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, repeated-measures observational study during the New South Wales Ambulance Aeromedical Operations induction training from 2019 to 2020. Participants included senior critical care doctors, paramedics, and nurses undergoing high-fidelity simulation of prehospital and interhospital aeromedical missions. Task load was measured using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration task load index (NASA-TLX) administered following each simulation debrief. Prehospital and interhospital simulations were compared separately by building a multilevel model for complete case and all study data. Post hoc comparisons of NASA-TLX score for each group were performed using estimated marginal means (EMMs).

RESULTS

We enrolled 70 participants, comprising 49 physicians (70%), 19 paramedics (27%), and two flight nurses (3%). From the complete case analysis, statistically significant differences were observed for total NASA-TLX scores between active participants and directed observers in both prehospital (participant EMM 78, observer EMM 65, estimated difference -13, 95% confidence interval [CI] -20 to -7) and interhospital simulations (participant EMM 69, observer EMM 59, estimated difference -10, 95% CI -16 to -3). When all available data were included, the pattern of results did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

In our sample of senior clinicians, the task load experienced by both active participants and directed observers in high-fidelity simulation education was high for both prehospital and interhospital simulation exercises. The statistically significant differences we report are unlikely to be practically significant. Our results support the use of directed observers when resource limitations do not allow all course attendees to participate in every simulation.

摘要

目的

在高保真模拟教育中使用定向观察者的情况越来越普遍。虽然有证据表明,与技术技能培训中的主动参与者相比,定向观察者能取得相似的教育成果,但对于资深临床医生而言,这种益处是否也存在,尤其是在心理负荷方面,仍不确定。我们试图通过一种客观测量方法来比较主动参与者和定向观察者之间的负荷。

方法

我们在2019年至2020年新南威尔士州救护车航空医疗行动入职培训期间进行了一项前瞻性、重复测量观察性研究。参与者包括接受院前和院间航空医疗任务高保真模拟培训的资深重症医生、护理人员和护士。在每次模拟总结后,使用美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)测量任务负荷。通过为完整病例和所有研究数据建立多层次模型,分别对院前和院间模拟进行比较。使用估计边际均值(EMM)对每组的NASA-TLX分数进行事后比较。

结果

我们招募了70名参与者,包括49名医生(70%)、19名护理人员(27%)和两名飞行护士(3%)。从完整病例分析来看,在院前模拟(参与者EMM为78,观察者EMM为65,估计差异为-13,95%置信区间[CI]为-20至-7)和院间模拟(参与者EMM为69,观察者EMM为59,估计差异为-10,95%CI为-16至-3)中,主动参与者和定向观察者之间的总NASA-TLX分数均存在统计学显著差异。当纳入所有可用数据时,结果模式没有改变。

结论

在我们选取资深临床医生的样本中,无论是院前还是院间模拟练习,主动参与者和定向观察者在高保真模拟教育中所经历的任务负荷都很高。我们报告的统计学显著差异在实际中不太可能具有显著意义。我们的结果支持在资源有限无法让所有课程参与者都参与每次模拟时使用定向观察者。

相似文献

1
Measured task load in directed observers versus active participants undergoing high-fidelity simulation education in a critical care setting.在重症监护环境中,对直接观察者与参与高保真模拟教育的主动参与者的任务负荷进行测量。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jul 11;7(4):e10894. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10894. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
The effect of repeated full immersion simulation training in ureterorenoscopy on mental workload of novice operators.反复全浸没模拟训练对新手操作者输尿管镜手术精神工作负荷的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1752-2.
3
Validation of the Raw National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) Questionnaire to Assess Perceived Workload in Patient Monitoring Tasks: Pooled Analysis Study Using Mixed Models.验证原始美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)问卷在评估患者监护任务中的感知工作量的有效性:使用混合模型的 pooled 分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 7;22(9):e19472. doi: 10.2196/19472.
4
An Evaluation of the Impact of High-Fidelity Endovascular Simulation on Surgeon Stress and Technical Performance.评价高逼真度血管内模拟对手术医生压力和技术表现的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2019 May-Jun;76(3):864-871. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
5
Human Factors Evaluation of the Universal Anaesthesia Machine: Assessing Equipment with High-Fidelity Simulation Prior to Deployment in a Resource-Constrained Environment.通用麻醉机的人为因素评估:在资源有限的环境中部署之前,使用高保真模拟评估设备。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2019 Oct;111(5):490-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Comparison of NASA-TLX scale, modified Cooper-Harper scale and mean inter-beat interval as measures of pilot mental workload during simulated flight tasks.比较 NASA-TLX 量表、改良的 Cooper-Harper 量表和平均心搏间期作为模拟飞行任务中飞行员心理工作量的测量指标。
Ergonomics. 2019 Feb;62(2):246-254. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1471159. Epub 2019 Jan 27.
7
Training improves laparoscopic tasks performance and decreases operator workload.培训可提高腹腔镜手术任务的执行能力,并减轻操作者的工作量。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1742-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4410-8. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
8
Mental workload during endoscopic sinus surgery is associated with surgeons' skill levels.鼻内镜鼻窦手术中的心理负荷与外科医生的技术水平相关。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 24;10:1090743. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1090743. eCollection 2023.
9
High-Fidelity Simulation to Assess Task Load Index and Performance: A Prospective Observational Study.使用高保真模拟评估任务负荷指数和绩效:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022 Aug;50(4):282-287. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21234.
10
Development and validation of a task load index for process control room operators (PCRO-TLX).开发和验证用于过程控制室操作人员(PCRO-TLX)的任务负荷指数。
Ergonomics. 2023 Dec;66(12):2121-2132. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2023.2186322. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring learning effectiveness for participant roles during healthcare simulation.探究医疗模拟中参与者角色的学习效果。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Dec;119:105561. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105561. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
2
'It is a different type of learning'. A survey-based study on how simulation educators see and construct observer roles.“这是一种不同类型的学习”。一项基于调查的关于模拟教育工作者如何看待和构建观察者角色的研究。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Sep 4;7(4):230-238. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000634. eCollection 2021.
3
Assessment of Healthcare Provider Workload in Neonatal Resuscitation.新生儿复苏中医护人员工作量的评估
Front Pediatr. 2020 Dec 22;8:598475. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.598475. eCollection 2020.
4
Learning outcomes of the observer role in nursing simulation: a scoping review protocol.护理模拟中观察者角色的学习成果:一项范围综述方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 May;18(5):1051-1056. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00172.
5
The effect of repeated full immersion simulation training in ureterorenoscopy on mental workload of novice operators.反复全浸没模拟训练对新手操作者输尿管镜手术精神工作负荷的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1752-2.
6
Simulation can offer a sustainable contribution to clinical education in osteopathy.模拟可为整骨疗法的临床教育做出可持续的贡献。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Jul 10;27:38. doi: 10.1186/s12998-019-0252-0. eCollection 2019.
7
Comparing the Learning Effectiveness of Healthcare Simulation in the Observer Versus Active Role: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较观察者和主动者在医疗保健模拟中的学习效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Simul Healthc. 2019 Oct;14(5):318-332. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000377.
8
A Mixed-methods Comparison of Participant and Observer Learner Roles in Simulation Education.模拟教育中参与者与观察者学习者角色的混合方法比较
AEM Educ Train. 2018 Dec 21;3(1):20-32. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10310. eCollection 2019 Jan.
9
Self-Reported Emotions in Simulation-Based Learning: Active Participants vs. Observers.基于模拟的学习中的自我报告情绪:主动参与者与观察者。
Simul Healthc. 2019 Jun;14(3):140-145. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000354.
10
Just watching is not enough: Fostering simulation-based learning with collaboration scripts.仅仅观看是不够的:通过协作脚本促进基于模拟的学习。
GMS J Med Educ. 2018 Aug 15;35(3):Doc35. doi: 10.3205/zma001181. eCollection 2018.