• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先进混合闭环系统改善1型糖尿病儿童的血糖风险指数、连续血糖监测指数及血糖达标时间:来自一项单中心研究的真实世界数据

The Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop Improves Glycemia Risk Index, Continuous Glucose Monitoring Index, and Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Real-World Data from a Single Center Study.

作者信息

Eviz Elif, Yesiltepe Mutlu Gul, Karakus Kagan Ege, Can Ecem, Gokce Tugba, Muradoglu Serra, Hatun Sukru

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Oct;25(10):689-696. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0112. Epub 2023 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1089/dia.2023.0112
PMID:37449922
Abstract

The Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Index (COGI) are newly defined composite metric parameters derived from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data. GRI is divided into five separate risk zones (from lowest to highest: A-E). In this study, the effect of the advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) system on GRI and COGI in children with type 1 diabetes was evaluated. Forty-five children who had started using the AHCL and whose baseline and sixth-month CGM data were available were analyzed in terms of achievement of CGM consensus goals and changes in GRI scores and zones. The paired -test was used for the analyses. The mean age and duration of diabetes of the participants were 10.95 ± 3.41 and 3.85 ± 2.67 years, respectively. The mean GRI score significantly decreased from 35.66 ± 17.46 at baseline to 22.83 ± 9.08 at 6 months ( < 0.001). Although the proportion of those in the A zone was 20% at baseline, it increased to 42% at 6 months. AHCL also improved COGI from 72.59 ± 12.44 to 82.90 ± 7.72 ( < 0.001). Time in range (TIR) increased significantly from 70.54% to 80.51% ( < 0.001) at 6 months. AHCL provides not only an improvement in TIR but also a significant improvement in both GRI and COGI at 6 months. The incorporation of GRI and COGI alongside TIR may enhance the assessment of the glycemic profile by providing a more comprehensive and in-depth analysis.

摘要

血糖风险指数(GRI)和连续血糖监测指数(COGI)是从连续血糖监测(CGM)数据中得出的新定义的综合指标参数。GRI分为五个不同的风险区域(从最低到最高:A - E)。在本研究中,评估了先进混合闭环(AHCL)系统对1型糖尿病儿童GRI和COGI的影响。对45名开始使用AHCL且有基线和六个月CGM数据的儿童,就CGM共识目标的达成情况以及GRI分数和区域的变化进行了分析。分析采用配对检验。参与者的平均年龄和糖尿病病程分别为10.95±3.41岁和3.85±2.67年。平均GRI分数从基线时的35.66±17.46显著降至6个月时的22.83±9.08(<0.001)。尽管A区的比例在基线时为20%,但在6个月时增至42%。AHCL还将COGI从72.59±12.44改善至82.90±7.72(<0.001)。6个月时,血糖达标时间(TIR)从70.54%显著增至80.51%(<0.001)。AHCL不仅改善了TIR,还在6个月时使GRI和COGI都有显著改善。将GRI和COGI与TIR结合使用,可能通过提供更全面、深入的分析来增强对血糖状况的评估。

相似文献

1
The Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop Improves Glycemia Risk Index, Continuous Glucose Monitoring Index, and Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Real-World Data from a Single Center Study.先进混合闭环系统改善1型糖尿病儿童的血糖风险指数、连续血糖监测指数及血糖达标时间:来自一项单中心研究的真实世界数据
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Oct;25(10):689-696. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0112. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
Real-Life Achievements of MiniMed 780G Advanced Closed-Loop System in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: AWeSoMe Study Group Multicenter Prospective Trial.《MiniMed 780G 高级闭环系统在青少年 1 型糖尿病中的真实世界疗效:AWeSoMe 研究组多中心前瞻性试验》。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Nov;26(11):869-880. doi: 10.1089/dia.2024.0148. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
Hybrid Closed-Loop Versus Manual Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis Using the Glycemia Risk Index.1 型糖尿病成人患者的混合闭环与手动胰岛素输注:使用血糖风险指数的事后分析。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):764-770. doi: 10.1177/19322968241231307. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
4
Impact on Glycemia Risk Index and other metrics in type 1 adult patients switching to Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop systems: a one-year real-life experience.1 型成年患者切换至高级混合闭环系统对血糖风险指数和其他指标的影响:一年真实世界经验。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 15;29(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01946-w.
5
Comparison of Glycemia Risk Index with Time in Range for Assessing Glycemic Quality.血糖风险指数与血糖达标时间比较评估血糖质量。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Dec;25(12):883-892. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0264. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
6
A Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) of Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Validated by Clinician Ratings.经临床医生评估验证的用于连续血糖监测的低血糖和高血糖血糖风险指数(GRI)。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Sep;17(5):1226-1242. doi: 10.1177/19322968221085273. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
7
Association of Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Glycemia Risk Index With Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-sectional Study.1型糖尿病患者连续血糖监测得出的血糖风险指数与心血管自主神经病变的关联:一项横断面研究
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Oct 14:19322968241288579. doi: 10.1177/19322968241288579.
8
Evaluating Glucose Control With a Novel Composite Continuous Glucose Monitoring Index.评估新型综合连续血糖监测指数的血糖控制情况。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Mar;14(2):277-283. doi: 10.1177/1932296819838525. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
9
Optimal Sampling Duration for Continuous Glucose Monitoring for the Estimation of Glycemia Risk Index.用于估算血糖风险指数的连续血糖监测的最佳采样持续时间。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Feb;25(2):140-142. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0401. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
10
Assessment of Glycemia Risk Index and Standard Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in a Real-World Setting of Exercise in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the Type 1 Diabetes and Exercise Initiative.1型糖尿病成人在现实运动环境中血糖风险指数和标准动态血糖监测指标的评估:1型糖尿病与运动倡议的事后分析
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):787-794. doi: 10.1177/19322968241246458. Epub 2024 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Glycated hemoglobin is not enough: The role of glycemia risk index for glycemic control assessment in type 1 diabetes.糖化血红蛋白并不够:血糖风险指数在1型糖尿病血糖控制评估中的作用
World J Diabetes. 2025 Jun 15;16(6):104024. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i6.104024.
2
Measurement of serum 1,5-AG provides insights for diabetes management and the anti-viral immune response.血清1,5-脱水葡萄糖醇的测量为糖尿病管理和抗病毒免疫反应提供了见解。
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2025 Feb 6;82(1):71. doi: 10.1007/s00018-024-05568-7.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
1型糖尿病患者自动胰岛素给药系统的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Metab J. 2025 Mar;49(2):235-251. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2024.0130. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
4
Correlation Between the Glycemia Risk Index and Longitudinal Hemoglobin A1c in Children and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.1 型糖尿病患儿和青年患者血糖风险指数与纵向糖化血红蛋白的相关性。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):771-778. doi: 10.1177/19322968241247219. Epub 2024 May 7.
5
The Glycemia Risk Index Predicts Performance of Diabetes Self-Management Habits in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.血糖风险指数预测青少年 1 型糖尿病患者糖尿病自我管理习惯的表现。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):779-786. doi: 10.1177/19322968241247215. Epub 2024 May 6.
6
Real-World Evidence of Automated Insulin Delivery System Use.真实世界中自动化胰岛素输注系统的使用证据。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Mar;26(S3):53-65. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0442.
7
Association between glycemia risk index and arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes.血糖风险指数与 2 型糖尿病患者动脉僵硬的关系。
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 May;15(5):614-622. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14153. Epub 2024 Jan 22.