Suppr超能文献

评估新型综合连续血糖监测指数的血糖控制情况。

Evaluating Glucose Control With a Novel Composite Continuous Glucose Monitoring Index.

机构信息

Manchester Diabetes Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.

Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Mar;14(2):277-283. doi: 10.1177/1932296819838525. Epub 2019 Mar 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to describe a novel composite continuous glucose monitoring index (COGI) and to evaluate its utility, in adults with type 1 diabetes, during hybrid closed-loop (HCL) therapy and multiple daily injections (MDI) therapy combined with real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).

METHODS

COGI consists of three key components of glucose control as assessed by CGM: Time in range (TIR), time below range (TBR), and glucose variability (GV) (weighted by 50%, 35% and 15%). COGI ranges from 0 to 100, where 1% increase of time <3.9 mmol/L (<70 mg/dl) is equivalent to 4.7% reduction of TIR between 3.9-10 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dl), and 0.5 mmol/L (9 mg/dl) increase in standard deviation is equivalent to 3% reduction in TIR.

RESULTS

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) users with HbA1c >7.5-10%, had significantly higher COGI during 12 weeks of HCL compared to sensor-augmented pump therapy, mean (SD), 60.3 (8.6) versus 69.5 (6.9), < .001. Similarly, in CSII users with HbA1c <7.5%, HCL improved COGI from 59.9 (11.2) to 74.8 (6.6), < .001. In MDI users with HbA1c >7.5% to 9.9%, use of real-time CGM led to improved COGI, 49.8 (14.2) versus 58.2 (9.1), < .0001. In MDI users with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia, use of real-time CGM led to improved COGI, 53.4 (12.2) versus 66.7 (11.1), < .001.

CONCLUSIONS

COGI summarizes three key aspects of CGM data into a concise metric that could be utilized to evaluate the quality of glucose control and to demonstrate the incremental benefit of a wide range of treatment modalities.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述一种新型的连续血糖监测综合指数(COGI),并评估其在接受混合闭环(HCL)治疗和实时连续血糖监测(CGM)联合多次皮下胰岛素注射(MDI)治疗的 1 型糖尿病成人患者中的应用价值。

方法

COGI 由 CGM 评估的三个血糖控制关键组成部分组成:血糖达标时间(TIR)、血糖低于目标范围时间(TBR)和血糖变异性(GV)(权重分别为 50%、35%和 15%)。COGI 的范围为 0 至 100,血糖<3.9mmol/L(<70mg/dl)的时间增加 1%相当于 TIR 降低 4.7%(3.9-10mmol/L,<70-180mg/dl),标准差增加 0.5mmol/L(9mg/dl)相当于 TIR 降低 3%。

结果

HbA1c>7.5-10%的接受连续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)的患者在 HCL 治疗 12 周时的 COGI 显著高于传感器增强型泵治疗,平均值(标准差)分别为 60.3(8.6)和 69.5(6.9),<0.001。同样,HbA1c<7.5%的 CSII 患者的 COGI 从 59.9(11.2)改善至 74.8(6.6),<0.001。HbA1c>7.5-9.9%的 MDI 患者使用实时 CGM 可改善 COGI,从 49.8(14.2)改善至 58.2(9.1),<0.0001。在低血糖感知受损的 MDI 患者中,使用实时 CGM 可改善 COGI,从 53.4(12.2)改善至 66.7(11.1),<0.001。

结论

COGI 将 CGM 数据的三个关键方面总结为一个简洁的指标,可用于评估血糖控制的质量,并证明各种治疗方式的附加获益。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Diabetes Technology Meeting 2020.2020 年糖尿病技术会议。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Jul;15(4):916-960. doi: 10.1177/19322968211016480.
7
Interpreting blood GLUcose data with R package iglu.使用 R 包 iglu 解读血糖数据。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0248560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248560. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验