Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):779-786. doi: 10.1177/19322968241247215. Epub 2024 May 6.
The Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) was developed in adults with diabetes and is a validated metric of quality of glycemia. Little is known about the relationship between GRI and type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-management habits, a validated assessment of youths' engagement in habits associated with glycemic outcomes.
We retrospectively examined the relationship between GRI and T1D self-management habits in youth with T1D who received care from a Midwest pediatric diabetes clinic network. The GRI was calculated using seven days of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) data, and T1D self-management habits were assessed ±seven days from the GRI score. A mixed-effects Poisson regression model was used to evaluate the total number of habits youth engaged in with GRI, glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), age, race, ethnicity, and insurance type as fixed effects and participant ID as a random effect to account for multiple clinic visits per individual.
The cohort included 1182 youth aged 2.5 to 18.0 years (mean = 13.8, SD = 3.5) comprising 50.8% male, 84.6% non-Hispanic White, and 64.8% commercial insurance users across a total of 6029 clinic visits. Glycemia Risk Index scores decreased as total number of habits performed increased, suggesting youth who performed more self-management habits achieved a higher quality of glycemia.
In youth using CGMs, GRI may serve as an easily obtainable metric to help identify youth with above target glycemia, and engagement/disengagement in the T1D self-management habits may inform clinicians with suitable interventions for improving glycemic outcomes.
血糖风险指数(GRI)是在糖尿病患者中开发的,是衡量血糖质量的有效指标。目前对于 GRI 与 1 型糖尿病(T1D)自我管理习惯之间的关系知之甚少,而后者是评估青少年参与与血糖结果相关习惯的有效评估方法。
我们回顾性分析了 Midwest 儿科糖尿病诊所网络中接受治疗的 T1D 青少年的 GRI 与 T1D 自我管理习惯之间的关系。使用七天的连续血糖监测(CGM)数据计算 GRI,并且在 GRI 评分的±七天内评估 T1D 自我管理习惯。采用混合效应泊松回归模型评估青少年参与 GRI、糖化血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)、年龄、种族、民族和保险类型的总习惯数作为固定效应,并将参与者 ID 作为随机效应,以考虑每个个体的多次就诊。
该队列包括 1182 名年龄在 2.5 至 18.0 岁(均值=13.8,SD=3.5)的青少年,其中 50.8%为男性,84.6%为非西班牙裔白人,64.8%为商业保险使用者,共进行了 6029 次就诊。随着所执行的习惯总数的增加,血糖风险指数评分降低,这表明执行更多自我管理习惯的青少年实现了更高质量的血糖控制。
在使用 CGM 的青少年中,GRI 可以作为一种易于获得的指标,帮助识别血糖控制不理想的青少年,而参与或不参与 T1D 自我管理习惯可能为改善血糖结果的合适干预措施提供信息。