• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Glycemia Risk Index Predicts Performance of Diabetes Self-Management Habits in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.血糖风险指数预测青少年 1 型糖尿病患者糖尿病自我管理习惯的表现。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):779-786. doi: 10.1177/19322968241247215. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Correlation Between the Glycemia Risk Index and Longitudinal Hemoglobin A1c in Children and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.1 型糖尿病患儿和青年患者血糖风险指数与纵向糖化血红蛋白的相关性。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):771-778. doi: 10.1177/19322968241247219. Epub 2024 May 7.
3
Real-Life Achievements of MiniMed 780G Advanced Closed-Loop System in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: AWeSoMe Study Group Multicenter Prospective Trial.《MiniMed 780G 高级闭环系统在青少年 1 型糖尿病中的真实世界疗效:AWeSoMe 研究组多中心前瞻性试验》。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Nov;26(11):869-880. doi: 10.1089/dia.2024.0148. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Adolescent-Initiated Retrospective Glucose Data Review is Associated With Improved Glycemia in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.青少年发起的回顾性血糖数据审查与1型糖尿病患者血糖改善相关。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2024 Oct 24;2024:5218915. doi: 10.1155/2024/5218915. eCollection 2024.
5
Glycemic variability through the perspective of the glycemia risk index and time in range and their association with glycated hemoglobin A1c in pediatric patients on sensor-augmented pump therapy.从血糖风险指数和达标时间的角度评估血糖变异性及其与接受传感器增强型胰岛素泵治疗的儿科患者糖化血红蛋白 A1c 的相关性。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 18;15:1388245. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1388245. eCollection 2024.
6
Disparities in Glycemic Outcomes Persist in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes and High-Technology Use.1型糖尿病青少年和高科技产品使用人群在血糖控制结果上仍存在差异。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2023 Oct 25;2023:6646582. doi: 10.1155/2023/6646582. eCollection 2023.
7
Glycemia Risk Index Assessment in a Pediatric and Adult Patient Cohort With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.血糖风险指数评估在儿科和成年 1 型糖尿病患者队列中。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1063-1069. doi: 10.1177/19322968231154561. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
8
Glycemic Risk Index Profiles and Predictors Among Diverse Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.血糖风险指数特征及不同类型 1 型糖尿病患者的预测因素。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1070-1078. doi: 10.1177/19322968231164151. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
9
Assessment of Glycemia Risk Index and Standard Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in a Real-World Setting of Exercise in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the Type 1 Diabetes and Exercise Initiative.1型糖尿病成人在现实运动环境中血糖风险指数和标准动态血糖监测指标的评估:1型糖尿病与运动倡议的事后分析
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):787-794. doi: 10.1177/19322968241246458. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
10
Glycemia Risk Index as a Novel Metric to Evaluate the Safety of Glycemic Control in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational, Multicenter, Real-Life Cohort Study.血糖风险指数作为评估 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年血糖控制安全性的新指标:一项观察性、多中心、真实世界队列研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Jul;25(7):507-512. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0040. Epub 2023 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Glycemia Risk Index and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Outcomes Following the Transition to an Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病患者转换为先进的混合闭环系统后血糖风险指数及连续血糖监测结果的评估
Adv Ther. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03326-0.
2
Glycemia risk index (GRI): a metric designed to facilitate the interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: a narrative review.血糖风险指数(GRI):一种旨在促进对连续血糖监测数据进行解读的指标:叙述性综述
J Endocrinol Invest. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1007/s40618-025-02609-1.
3
Implications of the Glycemia Risk Index in Assessing Metabolic Control and its Correlation With Therapy-Related Quality of Life During-Ramadan Fasting in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.血糖风险指数在评估2型糖尿病成人患者斋月禁食期间代谢控制及其与治疗相关生活质量相关性中的意义
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Feb 28:19322968251321860. doi: 10.1177/19322968251321860.
4
Evaluation of glycemia risk index and continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics in type 1 diabetes: a real-world observational study.1型糖尿病患者血糖风险指数及动态血糖监测指标评估:一项真实世界观察性研究
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2025 Feb 1;24(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s40200-025-01569-w. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Improvement of Glycemia Risk Index and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics During Ramadan Fasting in Type 1 Diabetes: A Real-World Observational Study.1型糖尿病患者斋月禁食期间血糖风险指数及连续血糖监测指标的改善:一项真实世界观察性研究
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 29:19322968241301750. doi: 10.1177/19322968241301750.
6
Exploring the Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pediatric Diabetes: Current Practices, Innovative Metrics, and Future Implications.探索儿童糖尿病的持续葡萄糖监测:当前实践、创新指标及未来影响
Children (Basel). 2024 Jul 27;11(8):907. doi: 10.3390/children11080907.

本文引用的文献

1
Are all HCL systems the same? long term outcomes of three HCL systems in children with type 1 diabetes: real-life registry-based study.所有 HCL 系统都一样吗?三种 HCL 系统治疗 1 型糖尿病儿童的长期结局:基于真实世界注册的研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 16;14:1283181. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1283181. eCollection 2023.
2
A comparative study using insulin pump therapy and continuous glucose monitoring in newly diagnosed very young children with type 1 diabetes: it is possible to bend the curve of HbA1c.一项新诊断的非常年幼的 1 型糖尿病儿童使用胰岛素泵治疗和连续血糖监测的对比研究:有可能使 HbA1c 曲线变平。
Acta Diabetol. 2023 Dec;60(12):1719-1726. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02155-3. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
3
The Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop Improves Glycemia Risk Index, Continuous Glucose Monitoring Index, and Time in Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Real-World Data from a Single Center Study.先进混合闭环系统改善1型糖尿病儿童的血糖风险指数、连续血糖监测指数及血糖达标时间:来自一项单中心研究的真实世界数据
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Oct;25(10):689-696. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0112. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
Glycemia Risk Index as a Novel Metric to Evaluate the Safety of Glycemic Control in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: An Observational, Multicenter, Real-Life Cohort Study.血糖风险指数作为评估 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年血糖控制安全性的新指标:一项观察性、多中心、真实世界队列研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Jul;25(7):507-512. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0040. Epub 2023 May 26.
5
Glycemic Control by Treatment Modalities: National Registry-Based Population Data in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.不同治疗方式对血糖的控制作用:基于国家注册登记系统的 1 型糖尿病患儿及青少年人群数据分析
Horm Res Paediatr. 2024;97(1):70-79. doi: 10.1159/000530833. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
6
Remote glucose monitoring is feasible for patients and providers using a commercially available population health platform.远程血糖监测对于使用商业化人群健康平台的患者和医护人员而言是可行的。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 2;14:1063290. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1063290. eCollection 2023.
7
MiniMed 780G Six-Month Use in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: Clinical Targets and Predictors of Optimal Glucose Control.美敦力 780G 系统用于 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年的六个月使用:最佳血糖控制的临床目标和预测因素。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Jun;25(6):404-413. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0491. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
8
MiniMed 780G™ in 2- to 6-Year-Old Children: Safety and Clinical Outcomes After the First 12 Weeks.2 至 6 岁儿童使用 MiniMed 780G™:首个 12 周后的安全性和临床结局。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Feb;25(2):100-107. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0313. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
9
A Longitudinal View of Disparities in Insulin Pump Use Among Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.胰岛素泵在 1 型糖尿病青少年中的使用差异的纵向观察:青少年糖尿病研究 (SEARCH)。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Feb;25(2):131-139. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0340. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
10
Optimal Sampling Duration for Continuous Glucose Monitoring for the Estimation of Glycemia Risk Index.用于估算血糖风险指数的连续血糖监测的最佳采样持续时间。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Feb;25(2):140-142. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0401. Epub 2022 Dec 2.

血糖风险指数预测青少年 1 型糖尿病患者糖尿病自我管理习惯的表现。

The Glycemia Risk Index Predicts Performance of Diabetes Self-Management Habits in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

机构信息

Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Jul;18(4):779-786. doi: 10.1177/19322968241247215. Epub 2024 May 6.

DOI:10.1177/19322968241247215
PMID:38708581
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11307237/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) was developed in adults with diabetes and is a validated metric of quality of glycemia. Little is known about the relationship between GRI and type 1 diabetes (T1D) self-management habits, a validated assessment of youths' engagement in habits associated with glycemic outcomes.

METHOD

We retrospectively examined the relationship between GRI and T1D self-management habits in youth with T1D who received care from a Midwest pediatric diabetes clinic network. The GRI was calculated using seven days of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) data, and T1D self-management habits were assessed ±seven days from the GRI score. A mixed-effects Poisson regression model was used to evaluate the total number of habits youth engaged in with GRI, glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), age, race, ethnicity, and insurance type as fixed effects and participant ID as a random effect to account for multiple clinic visits per individual.

RESULTS

The cohort included 1182 youth aged 2.5 to 18.0 years (mean = 13.8, SD = 3.5) comprising 50.8% male, 84.6% non-Hispanic White, and 64.8% commercial insurance users across a total of 6029 clinic visits. Glycemia Risk Index scores decreased as total number of habits performed increased, suggesting youth who performed more self-management habits achieved a higher quality of glycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

In youth using CGMs, GRI may serve as an easily obtainable metric to help identify youth with above target glycemia, and engagement/disengagement in the T1D self-management habits may inform clinicians with suitable interventions for improving glycemic outcomes.

摘要

背景

血糖风险指数(GRI)是在糖尿病患者中开发的,是衡量血糖质量的有效指标。目前对于 GRI 与 1 型糖尿病(T1D)自我管理习惯之间的关系知之甚少,而后者是评估青少年参与与血糖结果相关习惯的有效评估方法。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 Midwest 儿科糖尿病诊所网络中接受治疗的 T1D 青少年的 GRI 与 T1D 自我管理习惯之间的关系。使用七天的连续血糖监测(CGM)数据计算 GRI,并且在 GRI 评分的±七天内评估 T1D 自我管理习惯。采用混合效应泊松回归模型评估青少年参与 GRI、糖化血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)、年龄、种族、民族和保险类型的总习惯数作为固定效应,并将参与者 ID 作为随机效应,以考虑每个个体的多次就诊。

结果

该队列包括 1182 名年龄在 2.5 至 18.0 岁(均值=13.8,SD=3.5)的青少年,其中 50.8%为男性,84.6%为非西班牙裔白人,64.8%为商业保险使用者,共进行了 6029 次就诊。随着所执行的习惯总数的增加,血糖风险指数评分降低,这表明执行更多自我管理习惯的青少年实现了更高质量的血糖控制。

结论

在使用 CGM 的青少年中,GRI 可以作为一种易于获得的指标,帮助识别血糖控制不理想的青少年,而参与或不参与 T1D 自我管理习惯可能为改善血糖结果的合适干预措施提供信息。