Rako Zvonimir A, Yogeswaran Athiththan, Lakatos Bálint K, Fábián Alexandra, Yildiz Selin, da Rocha Bruno Brito, Vadász István, Ghofrani Hossein Ardeschir, Seeger Werner, Gall Henning, Kremer Nils C, Richter Manuel J, Bauer Pascal, Tedford Ryan J, Naeije Robert, Kovács Attila, Tello Khodr
Department of Internal Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.
Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Hungary.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Nov;42(11):1518-1528. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
The right ventricle has a complex contraction pattern of uncertain clinical relevance. We aimed to assess the relationship between right ventricular (RV) contraction pattern and RV-pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling defined by the gold-standard pressure-volume loop-derived ratio of end-systolic/arterial elastance (Ees/Ea).
Prospectively enrolled patients with suspected or confirmed pulmonary hypertension underwent three-dimensional echocardiography, standard right heart catheterization, and RV conductance catheterization. RV-PA uncoupling was categorized as severe (Ees/Ea < 0.8), moderate (Ees/Ea 0.8-1.29), and none/mild (Ees/Ea ≥ 1.3). Clinical severity was determined from hemodynamics using a truncated version of the 2022 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society risk stratification scheme.
Fifty-three patients were included, 23 with no/mild, 24 with moderate, and 6 with severe uncoupling. Longitudinal shortening was decreased in patients with moderate vs no/mild uncoupling (p <0.001) and intermediate vs low hemodynamic risk (p < 0.001), discriminating low risk from intermediate/high risk with an optimal threshold of 18% (sensitivity 80%, specificity 87%). Anteroposterior shortening was impaired in patients with severe vs moderate uncoupling (p = 0.033), low vs intermediate risk (p = 0.018), and high vs intermediate risk (p = 0.010), discriminating high risk from intermediate/low risk with an optimal threshold of 15% (sensitivity 100%, specificity 83%). Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume was decreased in patients with severe uncoupling (p = 0.035 vs no/mild uncoupling).
Early RV-PA uncoupling is associated with reduced longitudinal function, whereas advanced RV-PA uncoupling is associated with reduced anteroposterior movement and LV preload, all in a risk-related fashion.
GOV: NCT04663217.
右心室具有复杂的收缩模式,其临床相关性尚不确定。我们旨在评估右心室(RV)收缩模式与通过金标准压力-容积环得出的收缩末期/动脉弹性比值(Ees/Ea)所定义的右心室-肺动脉(PA)耦合之间的关系。
前瞻性纳入疑似或确诊肺动脉高压的患者,进行三维超声心动图、标准右心导管检查和右心室电导导管检查。RV-PA解耦分为严重(Ees/Ea < 0.8)、中度(Ees/Ea 0.8 - 1.29)和无/轻度(Ees/Ea≥1.3)。使用2022年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲呼吸学会风险分层方案的简化版,根据血流动力学确定临床严重程度。
纳入53例患者,23例无/轻度解耦,24例中度解耦,6例严重解耦。与无/轻度解耦患者相比,中度解耦患者的纵向缩短减少(p < 0.001),与低血流动力学风险患者相比,中度血流动力学风险患者的纵向缩短减少(p < 0.001),以18%为最佳阈值区分低风险与中度/高风险(敏感性80%,特异性87%)。与中度解耦患者相比,严重解耦患者的前后缩短受损(p = 0.033),与中度风险患者相比,低风险患者的前后缩短受损(p = 0.018),与中度风险患者相比,高风险患者的前后缩短受损(p = 0.010),以15%为最佳阈值区分高风险与中度/低风险(敏感性100%,特异性83%)。严重解耦患者的左心室(LV)舒张末期容积减少(与无/轻度解耦相比,p = 0.0