Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail) - UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Nov 10;898:165536. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165536. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
Although prior studies have found associations of the ovarian reserve with urinary concentrations of some individual phenols and phthalate metabolites, little is known about the potential associations of these chemicals as a mixture with the ovarian reserve. We investigated whether mixtures of four urinary phenols (bisphenol A, butylparaben, methylparaben, propylparaben) and eight metabolites of five phthalate diesters including di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate were associated with markers of the ovarian reserve among 271 women attending a fertility center who enrolled in the Environment and Reproductive Health study (2004-2017). The analysis was restricted to one outcome per study participant using the earliest outcome after the last exposure assessment. Ovarian reserve markers included lower antral follicle count (AFC) defined as AFC < 7, circulating serum levels of day 3 follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) assessed by immunoassays, and diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) defined as either AFC < 7, FSH > 10 UI/L or primary infertility diagnosis of DOR. We applied Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) and quantile g-computation to estimate the joint associations and assess the interactions between chemical exposure biomarkers on the markers of the ovarian reserve while adjusting for confounders. Among all 271 women, 738 urine samples were collected. In quantile g-computation models, a quartile increase in the exposure biomarkers mixture was not significantly associated with lower AFC (OR = 1.10, 95 % CI = 0.52, 2.30), day 3 FSH levels (Beta = 0.30, 95 % CI = -0.32, 0.93) or DOR (OR = 1.02, 95 % CI = 0.52, 2.05). Similarly, BKMR did not show any evidence of associations between the mixture and any of the studied outcomes, or interactions between chemicals. Despite the lack of associations, these results need to be explored among women in other study cohorts.
虽然先前的研究已经发现卵巢储备与某些个体酚类和邻苯二甲酸酯代谢物的尿液浓度之间存在关联,但对于这些化学物质作为混合物与卵巢储备之间的潜在关联知之甚少。我们调查了在参加生育中心的 271 名女性中,四种尿液酚类物质(双酚 A、丁基对羟基苯甲酸酯、甲基对羟基苯甲酸酯、丙基对羟基苯甲酸酯)和五种邻苯二甲酸酯二酯的八种代谢物的混合物是否与卵巢储备的标志物相关,这些女性参与了环境与生殖健康研究(2004-2017 年)。分析仅限于每位研究参与者的一个结果,使用最后一次暴露评估后的最早结果。卵巢储备标志物包括卵巢储备功能降低(AFC),定义为 AFC<7;通过免疫测定评估的第 3 天血清卵泡刺激素(FSH)水平;以及卵巢储备减少(DOR),定义为 AFC<7、FSH>10 UI/L 或原发性不孕症诊断为 DOR。我们应用贝叶斯核机器回归(BKMR)和分位数 g 计算来估计联合关联,并在调整混杂因素的同时评估化学暴露生物标志物之间的相互作用对卵巢储备标志物的影响。在所有 271 名女性中,共采集了 738 份尿液样本。在分位数 g 计算模型中,暴露生物标志物混合物的四分位增加与 AFC 降低(OR=1.10,95%CI=0.52,2.30)、第 3 天 FSH 水平(Beta=0.30,95%CI= -0.32,0.93)或 DOR(OR=1.02,95%CI=0.52,2.05)无显著相关性。同样,BKMR 也没有显示混合物与任何研究结果之间存在关联的证据,也没有显示化学物质之间存在相互作用的证据。尽管没有关联,但这些结果需要在其他研究队列的女性中进行探索。