Suppr超能文献

双酚 A 及其替代品对卵母细胞健康的影响:范围综述。

Impact of Bisphenol A and its alternatives on oocyte health: a scoping review.

机构信息

School of Biomedical Science and Pharmacy, College of Health, Medicine, and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

Mothers and Babies Research Program and Women's Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Hum Reprod Update. 2024 Dec 1;30(6):653-691. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmae025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an endocrine disrupting chemical released from plastic materials, including food packaging and dental sealants, persisting in the environment and ubiquitously contaminating ecosystems and human populations. BPA can elicit an array of damaging health effects and, alarmingly, 'BPA-free' alternatives mirror these harmful effects. Bisphenol exposure can negatively impact female fertility, damaging both the ovary and oocytes therein. Such damage can diminish reproductive capacity, pregnancy success, and offspring health. Despite global government regulations in place to indicate 'safe' BPA exposure levels, these policies have not considered the effects of bisphenols on oocyte health.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This scoping review was conducted to evaluate evidence on the effects of BPA and BPA alternatives on standardized parameters of oocyte health. In doing so, this review addresses a critical gap in the literature providing a comprehensive, up-to-date synthesis of the effects of bisphenols on oocyte health.

SEARCH METHODS

This scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Four databases, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched twice (23 February 2022 and 1 August 2023) to capture studies assessing mammalian oocyte health post-bisphenol exposure. Search terms regarding oocytes, ovarian follicles, and bisphenols were utilized to identify relevant studies. Manuscripts written in English and reporting the effect of any bisphenol on mammalian oocyte health from all years were included. Parameters for toxicological studies were evaluated, including the number of bisphenol concentrations/doses tested, dosing regimen, biological replicates and/or animal numbers, and statistical information (for human studies). Standardized parameters of oocyte health including follicle counts, oocyte yield, oocyte meiotic capacity, morphology of oocyte and cumulus cells, and oocyte meiotic spindle integrity were extracted across the studies.

OUTCOMES

After screening 3147 studies, 107 studies of either humans or mammalian animal models or humans were included. Of the in vitro exposure studies, 96.3% (26/27) and 94.1% (16/17) found at least one adverse effect on oocyte health using BPA or BPA alternatives (including BHPF, BPAF, BPB, BPF, and BPS), respectively. These included increased meiotic cell cycle arrest, altered morphology, and abnormal meiotic spindle/chromosomal alignment. In vivo, 85.7% (30/35) of studies on BPA and 92.3% (12/13) on BPA alternatives documented adverse effects on follicle development, morphology, or spindle/chromosome alignment. Importantly, these effects were recorded using levels below those deemed 'safe' for human exposure. Over half (11/21) of all human observational studies showed associations between higher urinary BPA levels and reduced antral follicle counts or oocyte yield in IVF patients. Recommendations are presented based on the identified shortcomings of the current evidence, incorporating elements of FDA requirements for future research in the field.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

These data highlight the detrimental impacts of low-level BPA and BPA alternative exposure, contributing to poor oocyte quality and reduced fertility. These outcomes are valuable in promoting the revision of current policies and guidelines pertaining to BPA exposure internationally. This study serves as a valuable resource to scientists, providing key recommendations on study design, reporting elements, and endpoint measures to strengthen future studies. Ultimately, this review highlights oocyte health as a fundamentally important endpoint in reproductive toxicological studies, indicating an important direction for future research into endocrine disrupting chemicals to improve fertility outcomes.

摘要

背景

双酚 A(BPA)是一种内分泌干扰化学物质,从塑料材料(包括食品包装和牙用密封剂)中释放出来,在环境中持续存在,广泛污染生态系统和人类群体。BPA 可以引起一系列有害的健康影响,而且令人震惊的是,“不含 BPA”的替代品也会产生这些有害影响。双酚暴露会对女性生育能力产生负面影响,损害卵巢和其中的卵子。这种损害会降低生殖能力、妊娠成功率和后代健康。尽管全球政府制定了规定来表明“安全”的 BPA 暴露水平,但这些政策并未考虑双酚对卵子健康的影响。

目的和理由

本范围综述旨在评估 BPA 和 BPA 替代品对卵子健康标准化参数的影响。通过这样做,本综述填补了文献中的一个关键空白,提供了关于双酚对卵子健康影响的全面、最新综合。

搜索方法

本范围综述是根据 PRISMA 指南进行的。在 2022 年 2 月 23 日和 2023 年 8 月 1 日进行了两次搜索,以捕获评估哺乳动物卵子健康后双酚暴露的研究,使用了关于卵子、卵巢卵泡和双酚的搜索词,以确定相关研究。纳入了所有年份报告任何双酚对哺乳动物卵子健康影响的英文书写的研究。评估了毒理学研究的参数,包括测试的双酚浓度/剂量数量、剂量方案、生物重复和/或动物数量以及统计信息(对于人类研究)。从研究中提取了卵子健康的标准化参数,包括卵泡计数、卵子产量、卵子减数分裂能力、卵子和卵丘细胞的形态以及卵子减数分裂纺锤体完整性。

结果

在筛选了 3147 项研究后,纳入了 107 项人类或哺乳动物动物模型或人类的研究。在体外暴露研究中,使用 BPA 或 BPA 替代品(包括 BHPF、BPAF、BPB、BPF 和 BPS),96.3%(26/27)和 94.1%(16/17)的研究至少发现了一种对卵子健康的不良影响,这些影响包括减数分裂细胞周期停滞增加、形态改变和异常减数分裂纺锤体/染色体排列。在体内,85.7%(30/35)的 BPA 研究和 92.3%(12/13)的 BPA 替代品研究记录了对卵泡发育、形态或纺锤体/染色体排列的不良影响。重要的是,这些影响是在用被认为对人类暴露“安全”的水平记录的。超过一半(11/21)的所有人类观察性研究表明,较高的尿液 BPA 水平与接受体外受精的患者的窦卵泡计数或卵子产量减少之间存在关联。根据当前证据的缺陷提出了建议,纳入了 FDA 对该领域未来研究的要求。

更广泛的影响

这些数据突出了低水平 BPA 和 BPA 替代品暴露的有害影响,导致卵子质量差和生育能力下降。这些结果对于促进国际上对 BPA 暴露的政策和准则的修订具有重要意义。本研究为科学家提供了有价值的资源,提供了关于研究设计、报告要素和终点测量的关键建议,以加强未来的研究。最终,本综述强调卵子健康作为生殖毒理学研究中一个基本重要的终点,为研究内分泌干扰化学物质以改善生育结果指明了一个重要方向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验