Department of Veterinary Science, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil; ISI Institute, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
ISI Institute, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil.
Poult Sci. 2023 Sep;102(9):102849. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102849. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
The intestinal wall has on its surface, protrusions called villi that are responsible for the absorption of nutrients. Commonly, these structures have their dimensions measured to related more area surface with better absorption. However, the measurement of these villi neglects the inflammation and the presence of immature cells that increase the surface area but affect negatively the absorption and compromise the animal performance. The measurements of villi/crypt are traditional tools in animal research; however, they may overlook alterations that impact the mucosal functionality. This study aimed to compare the morphometry of the intestinal villi/crypt with the I See Inside (ISI) scoring methodology, exploring their correlation with zootechnical performance. Therefore, broilers were grouped as nonchallenged (NC) and challenged with Eimeria (CH) and jejunum samples were collected at 22 d for histological analysis. The same villi were submitted to the ISI methodology, which is based on the scoring of 8 parameters related to the inflammatory process, and the measurements of villus height (VH), villus width (VW), crypt depth (CD), crypt width (CW), VH:CD ratio and villi absorptive surface (VAS). The CH group presented higher ISI total score, VW, CD, CW and lower VH, VH:CD, and VAS in comparison to the NC group. While the villi/crypt morphometry did not exhibit correlations with performance, the presence of Eimeria oocysts and the ISI total score was positively correlated (P < 0.05) with the feed conversion ratio (FCR), demonstrating a statistical interaction between high ISI scores and worse performance. In conclusion, a larger villus is not related to better intestinal functionality when this enlargement is unleashed by the immune processes occurring inside. The scoring system that evaluates the type of alteration observed has a direct impact on the animal's zootechnical performance which is not observed with the single metric surface evaluation.
肠壁表面有突起,称为绒毛,负责吸收营养。通常,这些结构的尺寸会被测量,以与更好的吸收相关的更大表面积相关。然而,这些绒毛的测量忽略了炎症和未成熟细胞的存在,这些细胞会增加表面积,但会对吸收产生负面影响,并影响动物的性能。绒毛/隐窝的测量是动物研究中的传统工具;然而,它们可能会忽略影响粘膜功能的变化。本研究旨在比较肠绒毛/隐窝的形态测量与 I See Inside(ISI)评分方法,探索它们与动物生产性能的相关性。因此,将肉鸡分为未受挑战(NC)和受艾美耳球虫挑战(CH)两组,并在 22 日龄时收集空肠样本进行组织学分析。同一绒毛采用 ISI 方法进行评分,该方法基于 8 个与炎症过程相关参数的评分,以及绒毛高度(VH)、绒毛宽度(VW)、隐窝深度(CD)、隐窝宽度(CW)、VH:CD 比和绒毛吸收表面积(VAS)的测量。与 NC 组相比,CH 组的 ISI 总分、VW、CD、CW 较高,VH、VH:CD 和 VAS 较低。虽然绒毛/隐窝形态学测量与性能没有相关性,但艾美耳球虫卵囊的存在和 ISI 总分与饲料转化率(FCR)呈正相关(P<0.05),表明高 ISI 评分和较差的性能之间存在统计相互作用。总之,当免疫过程引起的绒毛增大时,较大的绒毛并不与更好的肠道功能相关。评估所观察到的改变类型的评分系统对动物的生产性能有直接影响,而仅用单一的表面评估指标则无法观察到这种影响。