• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外伤模拟牙即刻与延迟桩道内桩核的抗折性能

Fracture resistance of post and core in immediate and delayed post space in trauma simulated teeth.

作者信息

Tripathi Shubham, Patni Pallav Mahesh, Jain Pradeep, Raghuwanshi Swadhin, Pandey Sanket H, Soni Ankita, Jain Swati

机构信息

Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, Sri Aurobindo University Indore, MP, India.

出版信息

Int J Burns Trauma. 2023 Jun 15;13(3):116-125. eCollection 2023.

PMID:37455804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10349325/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This research aims to assess and analyze the fracture resistance of GC Everstick post with separate composite core buildup and Edelweiss prefabricated resin composite post and core single unit into immediate and delayed post space prepared teeth.

METHODS

A total of 120 extracted human mandibular premolars have been subjected to a standardized protocol of mechanical trauma to simulate tooth fracture. Teeth samples were randomly divided into four groups (n = 30) on the basis of time taken for the preparation of post space (approximately following root canal obturation and 24 h after root canal obturation) for the single unit Edelweiss post and core system and GC post with separate core buildup. Compressive load has been utilized to do the analysis necessary to establish the fracture resistance using a universal testing machine. The fracture force calculated was in Newtons (N), and a stereomicroscope was utilized for investigating the common causes of failure.

RESULTS

In an immediate post space prepared tooth, the GC post exhibited a mean failure load of 970.584 N. In contrast, the Edelweiss post, and core system showed a significantly higher mean failure load of 1250.349 N. In delayed post space prepared tooth, the GC Everstick post exhibited a mean failure load of 950.287 N. In contrast, the Edelweiss post, and core system showed a significantly higher mean failure load of 1229.348 N.

CONCLUSION

This study aims to assess and analyze the fracture resistance of the GC Everstick post with separate composite core buildup and the Edelweiss prefabricated resin composite post and core single unit in immediate and delayed post space prepared teeth. The study results showed that the failure modes in both groups were non-catastrophic in nature. These findings suggest that the Edelweiss post and core system may be a more suitable option for restoring teeth that have been subjected to traumatic conditions. The study provides valuable information for dental professionals in their decision-making process for post and core restoration techniques in teeth that have been subjected to trauma.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在评估和分析采用单独复合树脂核堆塑的GC Everstick桩以及雪绒花预成树脂复合桩核单桩,在即刻和延迟制备桩道的牙齿中的抗折性能。

方法

总共120颗拔除的人类下颌前磨牙接受了标准化的机械创伤方案以模拟牙齿折断。根据单桩雪绒花桩核系统和采用单独核堆塑的GC桩制备桩道的时间(大致在根管充填后以及根管充填后24小时),将牙齿样本随机分为四组(每组n = 30)。使用万能试验机施加压缩载荷,进行确定抗折性能所需的分析。计算得到的折断力以牛顿(N)为单位,并用体视显微镜研究常见的失败原因。

结果

在即刻制备桩道的牙齿中,GC桩的平均破坏载荷为970.584 N。相比之下,雪绒花桩核系统的平均破坏载荷显著更高,为1250.349 N。在延迟制备桩道的牙齿中,GC Everstick桩的平均破坏载荷为950.287 N。相比之下,雪绒花桩核系统的平均破坏载荷显著更高,为1229.348 N。

结论

本研究旨在评估和分析采用单独复合树脂核堆塑的GC Everstick桩以及雪绒花预成树脂复合桩核单桩,在即刻和延迟制备桩道的牙齿中的抗折性能。研究结果表明,两组的失败模式本质上均为非灾难性的。这些发现表明,雪绒花桩核系统可能是修复遭受创伤牙齿的更合适选择。该研究为牙科专业人员在创伤后牙齿桩核修复技术的决策过程中提供了有价值的信息。

相似文献

1
Fracture resistance of post and core in immediate and delayed post space in trauma simulated teeth.外伤模拟牙即刻与延迟桩道内桩核的抗折性能
Int J Burns Trauma. 2023 Jun 15;13(3):116-125. eCollection 2023.
2
An Evaluation of Fracture Resistance Strength of Different Post Systems in Endodontically Treated Teeth.不同桩系统在根管治疗后牙齿中的抗折强度评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 May;11(Suppl 2):S236-S239. doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_306_18.
3
Fracture resistance of thin wall endodontically treated teeth without ferrules restored with various techniques.无箍环修复的薄壁根管治疗后牙的抗折性能与各种技术的关系。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Jun;34(4):670-679. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12859. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
4
Resin Composite Core and Fiber Post Improved the Fracture Parameters of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars with Wedge-shaped Cervical Lesions.树脂复合体核与纤维桩改善了患有楔形颈部病变的经根管治疗的上颌前磨牙的骨折参数。
J Endod. 2020 Nov;46(11):1733-1737. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.018. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.上颌切牙结构受损牙根中根管桩的体外比较
SADJ. 2011 Jun;66(5):220-3.
6
Impact of Root Dentin Thickness on the in vitro Compressive Strength of Teeth treated with Recent Post and Core Systems.牙根牙本质厚度对采用新型桩核系统治疗的牙齿体外抗压强度的影响
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Nov 1;18(11):1065-1070. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2177.
7
In Vitro Assessment of Retention and Resistance Failure Loads of Teeth Restored with a Complete Coverage Restoration and Different Core Materials.体外评估全冠修复和不同核材料修复的牙齿保留和抗力失败负荷。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e229-e236. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12668. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
A Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored Using Different Fiber Posts: An Study.使用不同纤维桩修复的根管治疗后牙齿的抗折性和失效模式的比较分析:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Oct 1;20(10):1195-1199.
9
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Biodentine, Resin Modified GIC and Hybrid Composite Resin as a Core Material.以生物陶瓷、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和混合复合树脂作为核心材料对根管治疗后的牙齿进行修复的抗折性能。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZC68-ZC70. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28263.10625. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
10
Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.块状充填基底材料对分层树脂复合材料修复根管后牙抗折强度的影响。
J Dent. 2017 Aug;63:60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Retrospective study of fracture survival in endodontically treated molars: the effect of single-unit crowns versus direct-resin composite restorations.牙髓治疗后磨牙骨折存活率的回顾性研究:单冠修复与直接树脂复合材料修复的效果比较
Restor Dent Endod. 2021 May 6;46(2):e29. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e29. eCollection 2021 May.
2
Retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of restored endodontically treated teeth.牙髓治疗后修复牙齿的回顾性临床与影像学评估
Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Oct 7;45(4):e49. doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e49. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
Influence of glass fibre post cementation depth on dental root fracture.玻璃纤维桩黏结深度对牙根折裂的影响
Stomatologija. 2018;20(2):43-48.
4
Smear layer removal by different chemical solutions used with or without ultrasonic activation after post preparation.根管预备后使用不同化学溶液并结合或不结合超声激活去除玷污层。
Restor Dent Endod. 2017 Nov;42(4):324-331. doi: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.4.324. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
5
Evaluation of different surface treatments on fiber post cemented with a self-adhesive system.对采用自粘系统粘结的纤维桩进行不同表面处理的评估。
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Aug 1;77:257-262. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.141. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
6
Post space preparation timing of root canals sealed with AH Plus sealer.使用AH Plus封闭剂封闭根管后的根管预备时机。
Restor Dent Endod. 2017 Feb;42(1):27-33. doi: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.27. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
7
Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) approach.牙科材料学会关于使用微拉伸结合强度 (μTBS) 方法体外测试牙本质/牙釉质牙用复合树脂粘结效果的指导意见。
Dent Mater. 2017 Feb;33(2):133-143. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
8
Fracture resistance of upper central incisors restored with different posts and cores.使用不同桩核修复上颌中切牙的抗折性
Restor Dent Endod. 2015 Aug;40(3):229-35. doi: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.3.229. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
9
Chemical characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate and its hydration reaction.三氧化矿物凝聚体的化学特性及其水化反应。
Restor Dent Endod. 2012 Nov;37(4):188-93. doi: 10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.188. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
10
A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study.不同桩核系统修复的根管治疗后牙抗折性能的比较评价——一项体外研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Jun;3(2):90-5. doi: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.90. Epub 2011 Jun 30.