Suppr超能文献

以生物陶瓷、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和混合复合树脂作为核心材料对根管治疗后的牙齿进行修复的抗折性能。

Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Biodentine, Resin Modified GIC and Hybrid Composite Resin as a Core Material.

作者信息

Subash Dayalan, Shoba Krishnamma, Aman Shibu, Bharkavi Srinivasan Kumar Indu, Nimmi Vijayan, Abhilash Radhakrishnan

机构信息

Senior Resident, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.

Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.

出版信息

J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZC68-ZC70. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28263.10625. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The restoration of a severely damaged tooth usually needs a post and core as a part of treatment procedure to provide a corono - radicular stabilization. Biodentine is a class of dental material which possess high mechanical properties with excellent biocompatibility and bioactive behaviour. The sealing ability coupled with optimum physical properties could make Biodentine an excellent option as a core material.

AIM

The aim of the study was to determine the fracture resistance of Biodentine as a core material in comparison with resin modified glass ionomer and composite resin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Freshly extracted 30 human permanent maxillary central incisors were selected. After endodontic treatment followed by post space preparation and luting of Glass fibre post (Reforpost, Angelus), the samples were divided in to three groups based on the type of core material. The core build-up used in Group I was Biodentine (Septodont, France), Group II was Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (GC, Japan) and Group III was Hybrid Composite Resin (TeEconom plus, Ivoclar vivadent). The specimens were subjected to fracture toughness using Universal testing machine (1474, Zwick/Roell, Germany) and results were compared using One-way analysis of variance with Tukey's Post hoc test.

RESULTS

The results showed that there was significant difference between groups in terms of fracture load. Also, composite resin exhibited highest mean fracture load (1039.9 N), whereas teeth restored with Biodentine demonstrated the lowest mean fracture load (176.66 N). Resin modified glass ionomer exhibited intermediate fracture load (612.07 N). The primary mode of failure in Group I and Group II was favourable (100%) while unfavourable fracture was seen in Group III (30%).

CONCLUSION

Biodentine, does not satisfy the requirements to be used as an ideal core material. The uses of RMGIC's as a core build-up material should be limited to non-stress bearing areas. Composite resin is still the best core build-up material owing to its high fracture resistance and bonding to tooth.

摘要

引言

严重受损牙齿的修复通常需要桩核作为治疗程序的一部分,以提供冠根稳定。生物活性玻璃是一类牙科材料,具有高机械性能、优异的生物相容性和生物活性。其密封能力以及最佳的物理性能,使其成为一种出色的核材料选择。

目的

本研究的目的是比较生物活性玻璃作为核材料与树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和复合树脂的抗折强度。

材料与方法

选取30颗新鲜拔除的人上颌恒中切牙。在进行根管治疗、制备桩道并粘结玻璃纤维桩(Reforpost,安杰卢斯公司)后,根据核材料类型将样本分为三组。第一组使用生物活性玻璃(法国Septodont公司)进行核修复,第二组使用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(日本GC公司),第三组使用混合复合树脂(TeEconom plus,义获嘉伟瓦登特公司)。使用万能材料试验机(德国Zwick/Roell公司的1474型)对样本进行断裂韧性测试,并使用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验比较结果。

结果

结果显示各组在断裂载荷方面存在显著差异。此外,复合树脂表现出最高的平均断裂载荷(1039.9 N),而用生物活性玻璃修复的牙齿平均断裂载荷最低(176.66 N)。树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀表现出中等断裂载荷(612.07 N)。第一组和第二组的主要失败模式是有利的(100%),而第三组出现了不利的骨折(30%)。

结论

生物活性玻璃不满足用作理想核材料的要求。树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀作为核修复材料的使用应限于非应力承载区域。由于其高抗折性和与牙齿的粘结性,复合树脂仍然是最佳的核修复材料。

相似文献

1
Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Biodentine, Resin Modified GIC and Hybrid Composite Resin as a Core Material.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZC68-ZC70. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28263.10625. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
5
Effect of fiber posts on the fracture resistance of maxillary central incisors with Class III restorations: An in vitro study.
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
7
Effect of Newer Intraorifice Barriers on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth: An In Vitro Study.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 15;16(9):e69463. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69463. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using four different intraorifice barriers: An study.
J Conserv Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;22(5):420-424. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_227_19. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
9
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with short fiber composite used as a core material-An in vitro study.
J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Oct;61(4):464-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

2
A Comparative Study of Success Rates of Post and Core Treated Anterior and Posterior Teeth Using Cast Metal Posts.
Cureus. 2022 Oct 26;14(10):e30735. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30735. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Patterns of Post-Endodontic Restoration: A Nationwide Survey of Dentists in Turkey.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 4;19(3):1794. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031794.
5
Immediate and long-term microshear bond strength of resin-based cements to core build-up materials.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Oct 1;13(10):e1030-e1037. doi: 10.4317/jced.58515. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using four different intraorifice barriers: An study.
J Conserv Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;22(5):420-424. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_227_19. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
8
Retrospective analysis of survival rates of post-and-cores in a dental school setting.
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Mar;123(3):434-441. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Physicochemical Properties and Dentin Bond Strength of a Tricalcium Silicate-Based Retrograde Material.
Braz Dent J. 2017 Jan-Feb;28(1):51-56. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201701135.
2
Clinical evaluation of the fiber post and direct composite resin restoration for fixed single crowns on endodontically treated teeth.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2015 Jul;71(3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.02.007. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
3
Cytotoxicity and physical properties of tricalcium silicate-based endodontic materials.
Restor Dent Endod. 2014 May;39(2):89-94. doi: 10.5395/rde.2014.39.2.89. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
9
Compressive strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material: effect of P/L ratio and storage time.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2005 Dec;13(4):356-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572005000400008.
10
Stress distribution in the cervical region of an upper central incisor in a 3D finite element model.
Braz Oral Res. 2009 Apr-Jun;23(2):161-8. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242009000200012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验