Department of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, University of Iowa, USA.
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, DIBINEM, University of Bolgna, Italy.
Dent Mater. 2017 Feb;33(2):133-143. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
An ideal dental adhesive should provide retentive strength, marginal seal, be relatively simple to achieve and demonstrate clinical durability. Future improvements in adhesive bonding to tooth structure require in vitro test methods that provide reliable data for materials development and/or evaluation of experimental variables. The objective of this project was to identify a test method that is relatively easy to perform, repeatable and ultimately useful for predicting clinical outcomes.
The Academy of Dental Materials initiated a project to develop and distribute guidance documents on laboratory test methods that are useful for the evaluation of dental adhesives and cements, composite resins and ceramics.
The dental adhesive sub-group has identified the micro-tensile bond strength test, especially after subjecting the specimens to a durability challenge, as currently the best practical surrogate measure of dental composite restoration retention.
The following μTBS guidance is meant to aid the researcher in conducting the μTBS test. The authors, while recognizing the limitations of a static, strength-based test method, welcome comments and suggestions for improvements of this guidance document in future revisions.
理想的牙科胶粘剂应提供固位强度、边缘密封,相对简单地实现并展示临床耐久性。未来对牙体结构胶粘剂粘结的改进需要提供可靠数据的体外测试方法,以用于材料开发和/或实验变量的评估。本项目的目的是确定一种相对容易执行、可重复且最终可用于预测临床结果的测试方法。
牙科材料学院启动了一个项目,制定并分发有关实验室测试方法的指南文件,这些方法对牙科胶粘剂和水门汀、复合树脂和陶瓷的评估有用。
牙科胶粘剂分组已经确定微拉伸粘结强度测试,特别是在对标本进行耐久性挑战后,作为目前测量牙科复合修复体保留力的最佳实用替代测量方法。
以下 μTBS 指南旨在帮助研究人员进行 μTBS 测试。作者虽然认识到基于强度的静态测试方法的局限性,但欢迎对本指南文件的改进提出意见和建议,以便在未来的修订中进行改进。