• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超级科学家动力组:非洲科学家提出的解决科学领域性别偏见和不平等问题的创新概念。

A PowerPack of SuperScientists: An innovative concept by African scientists to address gender bias and inequity in science.

作者信息

Mthembu Maphe, Baiyegunhi Omolara, Mdleleni Yanga, Ndlovu Lerato, Keal Hannah, Waddilove Kim, Yarrow Justin C, Kasprowicz Victoria, Ndung'u Thumbi, Wong Emily B

机构信息

Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, 4001, South Africa.

University of KwaZulu-Natal, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, Durban, 4001, South Africa.

出版信息

Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Feb 24;7:87. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17668.2. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17668.2
PMID:37456907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10338983/
Abstract

Underrepresentation of women in scientific leadership is a global problem. To understand and counter narratives that limit gender equity in African science, we conducted a public engagement campaign. Scientists representing six sub-Saharan African countries and multiple career stages used superhero imagery to create a diverse and unified team advocating for gender equity in science. In contrast to many traditional scientific environments and global campaigns, this "PowerPack of SuperScientists" was led by early-career Black female scientists whose perspectives are often under-represented in discussions about gender equity in science. The superhero imagery served as a powerful and fun antidote to imposter syndrome and helped to subvert traditional power structures based on age, race and sex. In an interactive social media campaign, the PowerPack developed insights into three themes: a) cultural stereotypes that limit women's scientific careers, b) the perception of a "conflict" between family and career responsibilities for women scientists, and c) solutions that can be adopted by key stakeholders to promote gender equity in African science. The PowerPack proposed solutions that could be undertaken by women working individually or collectively and interventions that require allyship from men, commitment from scientific institutions, and wider societal change. Further work is required to fully engage African scientists from even more diverse and disadvantaged backgrounds and institutions in these solutions and to enhance commitment by different stakeholders to achieving gender equity in science. Our experience suggests that creative tools should be used to subvert power dynamics and bring fresh perspectives and urgency to this topic.

摘要

女性在科学领导岗位上的代表性不足是一个全球性问题。为了理解并反驳那些限制非洲科学领域性别平等的观点,我们开展了一场公众参与活动。来自撒哈拉以南非洲六个国家、处于多个职业阶段的科学家利用超级英雄形象组建了一个多元化且团结的团队,倡导科学领域的性别平等。与许多传统科学环境和全球活动不同的是,这个“超级科学家动力组”由处于职业生涯早期的黑人女性科学家领导,她们的观点在关于科学领域性别平等的讨论中常常被忽视。超级英雄形象成为了对抗冒名顶替综合症的有力且有趣的解药,并有助于颠覆基于年龄、种族和性别的传统权力结构。在一场互动式社交媒体活动中,动力组对三个主题有了深刻见解:a)限制女性科学事业的文化刻板印象,b)女性科学家对家庭和职业责任之间“冲突”的认知,以及c)关键利益相关者为促进非洲科学领域性别平等可采取的解决方案。动力组提出了女性可单独或集体采取的解决方案,以及需要男性提供支持、科研机构做出承诺和更广泛社会变革的干预措施。还需要进一步开展工作,让来自更多样化、处境更不利背景和机构的非洲科学家充分参与到这些解决方案中,并增强不同利益相关者对实现科学领域性别平等的承诺。我们的经验表明应使用创造性工具来颠覆权力动态,并为这个话题带来新的视角和紧迫感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/817ffe8b35cf/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/3fca006992b7/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/214c86e34c42/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/2cd1d0fa6e89/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/8d43d97bb4e8/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/23a66479f488/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/a6611a85a70d/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/817ffe8b35cf/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/3fca006992b7/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/214c86e34c42/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/2cd1d0fa6e89/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/8d43d97bb4e8/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/23a66479f488/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/a6611a85a70d/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb85/10338985/817ffe8b35cf/wellcomeopenres-7-20687-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
A PowerPack of SuperScientists: An innovative concept by African scientists to address gender bias and inequity in science.超级科学家动力组:非洲科学家提出的解决科学领域性别偏见和不平等问题的创新概念。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Feb 24;7:87. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17668.2. eCollection 2022.
2
An intersectional gender analysis of familial and socio-cultural drivers of inequitable scientific career progression of researchers in Sub-Saharan Africa.对撒哈拉以南非洲地区研究人员科学职业发展不平等的家庭和社会文化驱动因素进行的交叉性别分析。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2021 Aug 17;6(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41256-021-00213-3.
3
"Mobilizing our leaders": A multi-country qualitative study to increase the representation of women in global health leadership.“动员我们的领导者”:一项多国定性研究,旨在增加女性在全球卫生领导领域的代表性。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan 30;3(1):e0000646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000646. eCollection 2023.
4
Outstanding women psychologists mainly from Europe - What helped and what limited them in their scientific careers? Guidelines for gender equity programs in academia.杰出的女性心理学家主要来自欧洲——在她们的科学职业生涯中,是什么助力了她们,又是什么限制了她们?学术界性别平等计划指南。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 6;13:877572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877572. eCollection 2022.
5
Workplace Gender Inequity Is Driven by Broader Societal Inequity: A Qualitative Study of Senior Japanese and American Radiation Oncologists.职场性别不平等由更广泛的社会不平等驱动:对日本和美国资深放射肿瘤学家的定性研究
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 Dec 24;7(2):100879. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100879. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
6
Advancing gender equality through the Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science: an exploratory study of women's and men's perceptions.通过《雅典娜天鹅科学领域女性宪章》推进性别平等:关于女性和男性认知的探索性研究
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 21;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0177-9.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Perceptual Facilitators for and Barriers to Career Progression: A Qualitative Study With Female Early Stage Investigators in Health Sciences.职业发展的感知促进因素和障碍:健康科学领域女性早期研究者的定性研究。
Acad Med. 2021 Apr 1;96(4):576-584. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003902.
9
Promoting equity in maternal, newborn and child health - how does gender factor in? Perceptions of public servants in the Ethiopian health sector.促进孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康公平——性别因素如何发挥作用?埃塞俄比亚卫生部门公务员的看法。
Glob Health Action. 2020;13(1):1704530. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1704530.
10
Developing a diversity, equity and inclusion compass to guide scientific capacity strengthening efforts in Africa.制定一个多元化、公平与包容指南,以指导非洲加强科研能力的工作。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 20;3(12):e0002339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002339. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Intersectionality and diversity, equity, and inclusion in the healthcare and scientific workforces.交叉性与医疗保健及科学工作队伍中的多样性、公平性和包容性。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Jan 13;41:100973. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100973. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Developing a diversity, equity and inclusion compass to guide scientific capacity strengthening efforts in Africa.制定一个多元化、公平与包容指南,以指导非洲加强科研能力的工作。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 20;3(12):e0002339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002339. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives on Gender in Science, Technology, and Innovation: A Review of Sub-Saharan Africa's Science Granting Councils and Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.科学、技术与创新领域的性别视角:撒哈拉以南非洲地区科学资助委员会及实现可持续发展目标综述
Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Apr 11;7:814600. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.814600. eCollection 2022.
2
An intersectional gender analysis of familial and socio-cultural drivers of inequitable scientific career progression of researchers in Sub-Saharan Africa.对撒哈拉以南非洲地区研究人员科学职业发展不平等的家庭和社会文化驱动因素进行的交叉性别分析。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2021 Aug 17;6(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41256-021-00213-3.
3
Experiences of workplace breastfeeding in a provincial government setting: a qualitative exploratory study among managers and mothers in South Africa.
省级政府工作场所母乳喂养体验:南非管理人员和母亲的定性探索性研究。
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 Nov 23;15(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13006-020-00342-4.
4
Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM.学术界的性别不平等:STEM 领域女性教职员工面临的问题与解决方案。
J Neurosci Res. 2021 Jan;99(1):13-23. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24631. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
5
The career cost of COVID-19 to female researchers, and how science should respond.新冠疫情对女性研究人员的职业代价,以及科学界应如何应对。
Nature. 2020 Jul;583(7818):867-869. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02183-x.
6
Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines.各国和各学科科学职业中性别不平等的历史比较。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 3;117(9):4609-4616. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914221117. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
7
Why we need to increase diversity in the immunology research community.为什么我们需要增加免疫研究领域的多样性。
Nat Immunol. 2019 Sep;20(9):1085-1088. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0470-6.
8
A sponsorship action plan for increasing diversity in STEMM.一项旨在增加STEMM领域多样性的赞助行动计划。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb 10;9(5):2340-2345. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4962. eCollection 2019 Mar.
9
Driving gender equity in African scientific institutions.推动非洲科研机构中的性别平等。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):504-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30284-3.
10
Fathers' Leave and Fathers' Involvement: Evidence from Four OECD Countries.父亲产假与父亲参与度:来自四个经合组织国家的证据。
Eur J Soc Secur. 2014 Dec;16(4):308-346. doi: 10.1177/138826271401600403. Epub 2017 Mar 9.