• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Minimal Clinically Important Difference: don't just look at the "p-value".

作者信息

Ostojic Marko, Winkler Philipp W, Karlsson Jon, Becker Roland, Prill Robert

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University Clinical Hospital Mostar, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Oct;31(10):4077-4079. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07512-x. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00167-023-07512-x
PMID:37460662
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Minimal Clinically Important Difference: don't just look at the "p-value".最小临床重要差异：不要只看“p值”。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Oct;31(10):4077-4079. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07512-x. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
2
Utility of lung clearance index in CF: What we know, what we don't know and musings on how to bridge the gap.肺清除指数在囊性纤维化中的应用：我们所知道的、我们不知道的以及关于如何弥合差距的思考。
J Cyst Fibros. 2020 Nov;19(6):852-855. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
3
Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Is a Low Bar.最小临床重要差异（MCID）标准较低。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Feb;39(2):139-141. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.11.001.
4
Minimal clinically important difference, minimal important difference, and effect size: securing clinical relevance in clinical trials. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2021; 127: e121-42.最小临床重要差异、最小重要差异和效应量：确保临床试验中的临床相关性。对《英国麻醉学杂志》2021年；127卷：e121 - 42页的评论
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Mar;128(3):e245-e246. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.035. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
5
Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Outcome Measure Score Interpretation.最小临床重要差异：结局测量分数解读综述
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2018 May;44(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
Minimal clinically important difference: The basics.最小临床重要差异：基础篇。
Medwave. 2021 Apr 7;21(3):e8149. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2021.03.8149.
7
Reply to: Minimal detectable change and minimal clinically important differences in spinal muscular atrophy patients.回复：脊髓性肌萎缩症患者的最小可检测变化和最小临床重要差异
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jun;28(6):e42-e43. doi: 10.1111/ene.14819. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
8
Letter to the editor concerning the article: "A prospective study to establish the minimal clinically important difference of the Mini-BESTest in individuals with stroke".致编辑的信，关于文章：“一项前瞻性研究，以确定中风患者中Mini-BESTest的最小临床重要差异”
Clin Rehabil. 2022 Feb;36(2):283-285. doi: 10.1177/02692155211040733. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
9
Conflating effect size and minimal clinically important difference. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1029-37.混淆效应量与最小临床重要差异。对《英国麻醉学杂志》2021年；126卷：1029 - 1037页文章的评论
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jan;128(1):e1-e2. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.018. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
10
Importance of pain score distribution to interpretation of the minimal clinically important difference.疼痛评分分布对最小临床重要差异解读的重要性。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Oct;127(4):e121-e123. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.06.032. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Order of surgical intervention in double-crush syndrome.双压迫综合征的手术干预顺序。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09291-0.
2
Periacetabular osteotomy versus hip arthroscopy in patients with borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip: A systematic review and multi-level meta-analysis.髋臼周围截骨术与髋关节镜检查治疗髋关节临界发育不良患者的系统评价和多层次荟萃分析
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 2;12(3):e70311. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70311. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Treatment Options for Patients With Iliopsoas Impingement Syndrome After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

本文引用的文献

1
Why there is a need to improve evaluation standards for clinical studies in orthopaedic and sports medicine.为何需要改进骨科与运动医学临床研究的评估标准。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jan;31(1):4-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07179-w. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
2
Meaningful values in the Short Form Health Survey-36 after total knee arthroplasty - an alternative to the EuroQol five-dimension index as a measure for health-related quality of life : minimal clinically important difference, minimal important change, patient-acceptable symptom state thresholds, and responsiveness.全膝关节置换术后简短健康调查问卷-36中的有意义值——作为健康相关生活质量衡量指标的欧洲五维健康量表的替代方法：最小临床重要差异、最小重要变化、患者可接受症状状态阈值及反应性
Bone Joint Res. 2022 Jul;11(7):477-483. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.117.BJR-2021-0493.R1.
3
全髋关节置换术后髂腰肌撞击综合征患者治疗方案的多水平Meta分析
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jul;17(7):1899-1912. doi: 10.1111/os.70021. Epub 2025 May 23.
4
Conservative treatment versus hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement : a multilevel meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.股骨髋臼撞击症患者的保守治疗与髋关节镜检查：随机对照试验的多水平荟萃分析
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Apr 23;6(4):480-498. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.64.BJO-2024-0198.R1.
5
Beyond statistical significance: Embracing minimal clinically important difference for better patient care.超越统计学意义：接受最小临床重要差异以提供更好的患者护理。
World J Methodol. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):97814. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i1.97814.
6
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) following surgical knee ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.膝关节韧带重建术后的最小临床重要差异（MCID）、患者可接受症状状态（PASS）和显著临床获益（SCB）：一项系统评价
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 22;51(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02708-3.
7
Mapping the reporting practices in recent randomised controlled trials published in : A scoping review of methodological quality.对发表于……的近期随机对照试验报告做法的映射：方法学质量的范围综述
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jan 7;12(1):e70117. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70117. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Enhancing research methods: The role of systematic and scoping reviews in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation.提升研究方法：系统评价与范围综述在骨科、运动医学和康复领域中的作用
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Nov 4;11(4):e70069. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70069. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
Clinical relevance of patient-reported outcome measures in patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.接受全髋关节置换术患者的患者报告结局测量的临床相关性：系统评价。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Nov;144(11):4907-4916. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05579-w. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
10
The efficacy and safety of oral microecological agents as add-on therapy for atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.口服微生态制剂作为特应性皮炎附加疗法的疗效和安全性：一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Transl Allergy. 2023 Dec;13(12):e12318. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12318.
The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Clinical Significance.最小临床重要差异：临床意义综述
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Feb;51(2):520-524. doi: 10.1177/03635465211053869. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
4
Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?测试最小临床重要差异：共识还是难题？
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.015.
5
Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.理解最小临床重要差异：概念与方法综述
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
6
Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation.健康相关生活质量变化的解读：半个标准差的显著普遍性。
Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C.
7
Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.健康状况的测量。确定最小临床重要差异。
Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6.