最小临床重要差异：不要只看“p值”。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Minimal Clinically Important Difference: don't just look at the "p-value".

作者信息

Ostojic Marko, Winkler Philipp W, Karlsson Jon, Becker Roland, Prill Robert

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University Clinical Hospital Mostar, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Oct;31(10):4077-4079. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07512-x. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00167-023-07512-x

PMID:37460662

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Minimal Clinically Important Difference: don't just look at the "p-value".

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Oct;31(10):4077-4079. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07512-x. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

Utility of lung clearance index in CF: What we know, what we don't know and musings on how to bridge the gap.

J Cyst Fibros. 2020 Nov;19(6):852-855. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Nov 8.

Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Is a Low Bar.

Arthroscopy. 2023 Feb;39(2):139-141. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.11.001.

Minimal clinically important difference, minimal important difference, and effect size: securing clinical relevance in clinical trials. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2021; 127: e121-42.

Br J Anaesth. 2022 Mar;128(3):e245-e246. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.12.035. Epub 2022 Jan 19.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Outcome Measure Score Interpretation.

Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2018 May;44(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

Minimal clinically important difference: The basics.

Medwave. 2021 Apr 7;21(3):e8149. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2021.03.8149.

Reply to: Minimal detectable change and minimal clinically important differences in spinal muscular atrophy patients.

Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jun;28(6):e42-e43. doi: 10.1111/ene.14819. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

Letter to the editor concerning the article: "A prospective study to establish the minimal clinically important difference of the Mini-BESTest in individuals with stroke".

Clin Rehabil. 2022 Feb;36(2):283-285. doi: 10.1177/02692155211040733. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

Conflating effect size and minimal clinically important difference. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2021; 126: 1029-37.

Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jan;128(1):e1-e2. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.018. Epub 2021 Oct 14.

Importance of pain score distribution to interpretation of the minimal clinically important difference.

Br J Anaesth. 2021 Oct;127(4):e121-e123. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.06.032. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

Order of surgical intervention in double-crush syndrome.

Eur Spine J. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09291-0.

Periacetabular osteotomy versus hip arthroscopy in patients with borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip: A systematic review and multi-level meta-analysis.

J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 2;12(3):e70311. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70311. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Treatment Options for Patients With Iliopsoas Impingement Syndrome After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Orthop Surg. 2025 Jul;17(7):1899-1912. doi: 10.1111/os.70021. Epub 2025 May 23.

Conservative treatment versus hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement : a multilevel meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Bone Jt Open. 2025 Apr 23;6(4):480-498. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.64.BJO-2024-0198.R1.

Beyond statistical significance: Embracing minimal clinically important difference for better patient care.

World J Methodol. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):97814. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i1.97814.

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) following surgical knee ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 22;51(1):32. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02708-3.

Mapping the reporting practices in recent randomised controlled trials published in : A scoping review of methodological quality.

J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jan 7;12(1):e70117. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70117. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Enhancing research methods: The role of systematic and scoping reviews in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation.

J Exp Orthop. 2024 Nov 4;11(4):e70069. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70069. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Clinical relevance of patient-reported outcome measures in patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Nov;144(11):4907-4916. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05579-w. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

The efficacy and safety of oral microecological agents as add-on therapy for atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Clin Transl Allergy. 2023 Dec;13(12):e12318. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12318.

本文引用的文献

Why there is a need to improve evaluation standards for clinical studies in orthopaedic and sports medicine.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jan;31(1):4-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07179-w. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

Meaningful values in the Short Form Health Survey-36 after total knee arthroplasty - an alternative to the EuroQol five-dimension index as a measure for health-related quality of life : minimal clinically important difference, minimal important change, patient-acceptable symptom state thresholds, and responsiveness.

Bone Joint Res. 2022 Jul;11(7):477-483. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.117.BJR-2021-0493.R1.

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference: A Review of Clinical Significance.

Am J Sports Med. 2023 Feb;51(2):520-524. doi: 10.1177/03635465211053869. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum?

Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.015.

Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.

Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008. Epub 2007 Apr 2.

Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation.

Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C.

Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.

Control Clin Trials. 1989 Dec;10(4):407-15. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验