Suppr超能文献

野火国家碳核算:2020年澳大利亚政府向《联合国气候变化框架公约》提交的温室气体账户报告中对自然和人为景观火灾排放的处理方式。

Wildfire national carbon accounting: how natural and anthropogenic landscape fires emissions are treated in the 2020 Australian government greenhouse gas accounts report to the UNFCCC.

作者信息

Bowman David Mjs, Williamson Grant J, Ndalila Mercy, Roxburgh Stephen H, Suitor Shaun, Keenan Rodney J

机构信息

Fire Centre, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.

School of Agriculture, Environment and Health Sciences, Machakos University, P.O. BOX 136, Machakos, 90100, Kenya.

出版信息

Carbon Balance Manag. 2023 Jul 17;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13021-023-00231-3.

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting of emissions from land use, land-use change, and forestry necessarily involves consideration of landscape fire. This is of particular importance for Australia given that natural and human fire is a common occurrence, and many ecosystems are adapted to fire, and require periodic burning for plant regeneration and ecological health. Landscape fire takes many forms, can be started by humans or by lightning, and can be managed or uncontrolled. We briefly review the underlying logic of greenhouse gas accounting involving landscape fire in the 2020 Australian Government GHG inventory report. The treatment of wildfire that Australia chooses to enact under the internationally agreed guidelines is based on two core assumptions (a) that effects of natural and anthropogenic fire in Australian vegetation carbon stocks are transient and they return to the pre-fire level relatively quickly, and (b) that historically and geographically anomalous wildfires in forests should be excluded from national anthropogenic emission estimates because they are beyond human control. It is now widely accepted that anthropogenic climate change is contributing to increased frequency and severity of forest fires in Australia, therefore challenging assumptions about the human agency in fire-related GHG emissions and carbon balance. Currently, the national inventory focuses on forest fires; we suggest national greenhouse gas accounting needs to provide a more detailed reporting of vegetation fires including: (a) more detailed mapping of fire severity patterns; (b) more comprehensive emission factors; (c) better growth and recovery models from different vegetation types; (d) improved understanding how fires of different severities affect carbon stocks; and (e) improved analysis of the human agency behind the causes of emissions, including ignition types and fire-weather conditions. This more comprehensive accounting of carbon emissions would provide greater incentives to improve fire management practices that reduce the frequency, severity, and extent of uncontrolled landscape fires.

摘要

土地利用、土地利用变化和林业排放的温室气体核算必然涉及对景观火灾的考量。这对澳大利亚尤为重要,因为自然和人为引发的火灾很常见,而且许多生态系统适应火灾,需要定期燃烧以促进植物再生和保持生态健康。景观火灾有多种形式,可由人类或闪电引发,可能得到管控,也可能不受控制。我们简要回顾了2020年澳大利亚政府温室气体清单报告中涉及景观火灾的温室气体核算的基本逻辑。澳大利亚根据国际商定的准则对野火的处理基于两个核心假设:(a)澳大利亚植被碳储量中自然和人为火灾的影响是短暂的,它们会相对较快地恢复到火灾前的水平;(b)森林中历史上和地理上异常的野火应排除在国家人为排放估计之外,因为它们超出了人类控制范围。现在人们普遍认为,人为气候变化导致澳大利亚森林火灾的频率和严重程度增加,因此对与火灾相关的温室气体排放和碳平衡中关于人类作用的假设提出了挑战。目前,国家清单关注森林火灾;我们建议国家温室气体核算需要更详细地报告植被火灾,包括:(a)更详细地绘制火灾严重程度模式图;(b)更全面的排放因子;(c)针对不同植被类型更好的生长和恢复模型;(d)更好地理解不同严重程度的火灾如何影响碳储量;(e)改进对排放原因背后人类作用的分析,包括点火类型和火灾天气条件。这种对碳排放更全面的核算将提供更大的动力来改进火灾管理做法,以减少不受控制的景观火灾的频率、严重程度和范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7446/10353246/1d28bec4c57e/13021_2023_231_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验