Hendijani Rosa, Steel Piers
Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Dec;58(4):1668-1683. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09793-w. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
Dualism has long been part of human sciences, including psychology and its sub-discipline of motivation. In psychology, such dualism is reflected in the rationalism-empiricism dichotomy. This dichotomy has resulted in two seemingly contradictory perspectives, including empiricism and rationalism. From empiricism perspective, the primary contact between subject and object is the passive reception of inputs from the environment. From rationalism perspective, the primary contact is through the match between conceptual forms and empirical observations. Relying on the notion of "being-in-the-world", activity theories reconcile these discrepancies by stressing the role of individual's activity in the contact between individual and the world. Similarly, in the motivation literature, such duality is highlighted by the dissection of motivation into intrinsic and extrinsic categories. It has resulted in three contrasting streams on the relationship between extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. The first stream by reinforcement theories argues that these two motivational mechanisms act in an additive way. The second stream by undermining theories posits that they interact in a negative way. Yet, the third stream by contingency theories postulates that the simultaneous effect of these motivational mechanisms depends on reward salience. These theoretical streams either implicitly or explicitly give priority to one type of motivation over the other. Emphasizing a dialectical stance, motivational congruence theory gives equal weight to both types of motivation. It stipulates that the perceived congruence between motivational mechanisms and context determines overall motivation and performance. The theory goes beyond the dualistic approach in motivation and resolves discrepancies that have long afflicted the literature.
二元论长期以来一直是人文科学的一部分,包括心理学及其动机子学科。在心理学中,这种二元论体现在理性主义与经验主义的二分法中。这种二分法产生了两种看似矛盾的观点,即经验主义和理性主义。从经验主义的角度来看,主体与客体之间的主要接触是对来自环境的输入的被动接受。从理性主义的角度来看,主要接触是通过概念形式与经验观察之间的匹配。活动理论依靠“在世存在”的概念,通过强调个体活动在个体与世界接触中的作用来调和这些差异。同样,在动机文献中,这种二元性通过将动机分为内在动机和外在动机而得到凸显。这导致了关于外在动机和内在动机之间关系的三种截然不同的流派。强化理论的第一个流派认为这两种动机机制以相加的方式起作用。破坏理论的第二个流派假定它们以消极的方式相互作用。然而,权变理论的第三个流派假设这些动机机制的同时作用取决于奖励的显著性。这些理论流派要么隐含地要么明确地优先考虑一种动机类型而不是另一种。动机一致性理论强调辩证立场,对两种动机类型给予同等重视。它规定动机机制与情境之间的感知一致性决定了整体动机和表现。该理论超越了动机研究中的二元论方法,解决了长期困扰该文献的分歧。