社区合作伙伴参与解决临床医生隐性偏见的学术培训的观点。
Perspectives of Community Partners Involved in an Academic Training to Address Clinicians' Implicit Bias.
出版信息
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(2):347-351. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2023.a900215.
BACKGROUND
Community-academic partnerships are increasingly used in interventions to address health care disparities. Little is known about motivations and perceptions of participating community members.
OBJECTIVES
To elicit community members' perspectives of involvement in a community-academic partnership to address implicit bias in health care.
METHODS
With our partnering community organizer, we conducted one-on-one semistructured interviews and a follow-up group interview with participating community members to solicit experiences about involvement in an National Institutes of Health-funded clinician training; responses were organized using content analysis.
RESULTS
Community members revealed that their participation was motivated by trust in our community organizer; they derived personal pride from participation in clinician training; the power differential between community members and clinicians in the training environment needed to be levelled. Our community organizer noted that the benefits of community-academic partnerships propagate to the larger community via community members' experiences.
CONCLUSIONS
Community members note trust, pride, and power as important elements in community-academic partnership.
背景
社区-学术伙伴关系越来越多地被用于解决医疗保健差距的干预措施。对于参与社区成员的动机和看法知之甚少。
目的
了解社区成员参与解决医疗保健中隐性偏见的社区-学术伙伴关系的观点。
方法
我们与合作社区组织者一起，对参与社区成员进行了一对一的半结构化访谈和后续的小组访谈，以征求他们参与美国国立卫生研究院资助的临床医生培训的经验；使用内容分析对回复进行了组织。
结果
社区成员透露，他们参与的动机是对我们社区组织者的信任；他们从参与临床医生培训中获得了个人自豪感；培训环境中社区成员与临床医生之间的权力差异需要平衡。我们的社区组织者指出，社区-学术伙伴关系的好处通过社区成员的经验传播到更大的社区。
结论
社区成员指出信任、自豪和权力是社区-学术伙伴关系的重要因素。
Zotero 插件