• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨澳大利亚公众对抗生素治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。

Exploring the Preferences of the Australian Public for Antibiotic Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

机构信息

Australian Centre for Health Engagement Evidence and Values, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.

Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, Cairns, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Patient. 2023 Sep;16(5):555-567. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00640-z. Epub 2023 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-023-00640-z
PMID:37462880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10409829/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Identify Australian public preferences for antibiotic treatments in the context of antibiotic stewardship.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted in Australia to investigate the importance of seven attributes associated with antibiotic treatments and related stewardship practices: contribution to antimicrobial resistance (AMR), treatment duration, side effects, days needed to recover, days before taking antibiotics, treatment failure and out-of-pocket costs. The DCE data were analysed using conditional logit, mixed logit and latent class conditional logit models. The relative importance of each attribute was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 1882 respondents completed the survey; the main study sample consist of 1658 respondents (mean age 48 years) who passed quality checks. All seven attributes significantly influenced respondents' preferences for antibiotic treatments. Based on the designed attribute levels in the DCE, on average, out-of-pocket costs (32.8%) and contribution to antibiotic resistance (30.3%) were the most important attributes, followed by side effects (12.9%). Days before starting medication was least important (3.9%). Three latent classes were identified. Class 1 (including respondents who were more likely to be older and more health literate; 24.5%) gave contribution to antibiotic resistance greater importance in treatment preferences. Class 2 (including respondents more likely to report poorer health; 25.2%) gave out-of-pocket costs greater importance. The remaining (50.4%), who were generally healthier, perceived side effects as the most important attribute.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite concerted public awareness raising campaigns, our results suggest that several factors may influence the preferences of Australians when considering antibiotic use. However, for those more likely to be aware of the need to preserve antibiotics, out-of-pocket costs and limiting the contribution to antibiotic resistance are the dominant influence. Delays in starting treatment were not important for any latent class, suggesting public tolerance for this measure. These results could help inform strategies to promote prudent antibiotic stewardship.

摘要

目的

在抗生素管理的背景下,确定澳大利亚公众对抗生素治疗的偏好。

方法

在澳大利亚进行了一项离散选择实验(DCE),以调查与抗生素治疗和相关管理实践相关的七个属性的重要性:对抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)的贡献、治疗持续时间、副作用、恢复所需天数、开始使用抗生素前的天数、治疗失败和自付费用。使用条件逻辑回归、混合逻辑回归和潜在类别条件逻辑回归模型分析 DCE 数据。计算每个属性的相对重要性。

结果

共有 1882 名受访者完成了调查;主要研究样本由 1658 名通过质量检查的受访者(平均年龄 48 岁)组成。所有七个属性都显著影响了受访者对抗生素治疗的偏好。基于 DCE 中的设计属性水平,平均而言,自付费用(32.8%)和对抗生素耐药性的贡献(30.3%)是最重要的属性,其次是副作用(12.9%)。开始用药前的天数是最不重要的(3.9%)。确定了三个潜在类别。类别 1(包括更可能年龄较大且健康素养较高的受访者;24.5%)在治疗偏好中更重视对抗生素耐药性的贡献。类别 2(包括更可能报告健康状况较差的受访者;25.2%)更重视自付费用。其余(50.4%)的人通常更健康,认为副作用是最重要的属性。

结论

尽管开展了集中的公众意识提高运动,但我们的结果表明,在考虑使用抗生素时,可能有几个因素会影响澳大利亚人的偏好。然而,对于那些更有可能意识到需要保存抗生素的人来说,自付费用和限制对抗生素耐药性的贡献是主要影响因素。任何潜在类别都不重要的是开始治疗的延迟,这表明公众对此措施有一定的容忍度。这些结果可以帮助制定促进审慎抗生素管理的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2e2/10409829/d19f2f246ee5/40271_2023_640_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2e2/10409829/7c22652eab22/40271_2023_640_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2e2/10409829/d19f2f246ee5/40271_2023_640_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2e2/10409829/7c22652eab22/40271_2023_640_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2e2/10409829/d19f2f246ee5/40271_2023_640_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Preferences of the Australian Public for Antibiotic Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment.探讨澳大利亚公众对抗生素治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Patient. 2023 Sep;16(5):555-567. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00640-z. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
2
Preferences regarding antibiotic treatment and the role of antibiotic resistance: A discrete choice experiment.抗生素治疗偏好及抗生素耐药性的作用:一项离散选择实验。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Dec;56(6):106198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106198. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
3
The influence of attributes on community preferences regarding antibiotic treatment: evidence from a discrete choice model.属性对社区对抗生素治疗偏好的影响:来自离散选择模型的证据。
Psychol Health Med. 2024 Sep;29(8):1448-1465. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2024.2342589. Epub 2024 May 3.
4
Patients' Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Applications Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in China: Discrete Choice Experiment.中国 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,患者对人工智能应用与临床医生在疾病诊断中的偏好:离散选择实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 23;23(2):e22841. doi: 10.2196/22841.
5
Patient Preferences for Attributes of Androgen Deprivation Therapies in Prostate Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Latent Class Analysis.患者对前列腺癌雄激素剥夺治疗属性的偏好:基于潜在类别分析的离散选择实验。
Adv Ther. 2024 Oct;41(10):3934-3950. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02955-1. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
6
Patient preferences for heart valve disease intervention.患者对心脏瓣膜病干预的偏好。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13929. doi: 10.1111/hex.13929. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
7
What Features of Fertility Treatment do Patients Value? Price Elasticity and Willingness-to-Pay Values from a Discrete Choice Experiment.患者看重生育治疗的哪些特征?来自离散选择实验的价格弹性和支付意愿值。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Jan;21(1):91-107. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00764-7. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
8
Attribute nonattendance in COVID-19 vaccine choice: A discrete choice experiment based on Chinese public preference.对 COVID-19 疫苗选择的属性非参与:基于中国公众偏好的离散选择实验。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):959-970. doi: 10.1111/hex.13439. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
9
Public Heterogeneous Preferences for Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Service Delivery in Western China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.公众对中国西部低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查服务提供的异质偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8259. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8259. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
10
Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?生存还是死亡:风险属性框架是否会影响离散选择实验中的决策行为?
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Elderly People's Preferences for Different Organizational Models for Frailty Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment.老年人对不同衰弱筛查组织模式的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Patient. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00738-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic prescribing in primary healthcare: Dominant factors and trade-offs in decision-making.基层医疗中的抗生素处方:决策中的主导因素与权衡
Infect Dis Health. 2018 Jun;23(2):74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2017.12.002. Epub 2018 May 7.
2
Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.2019 年与 33 种细菌病原体相关的全球死亡率:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2022 Dec 17;400(10369):2221-2248. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02185-7. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
3
Disease burden, associated mortality and economic impact of antimicrobial resistant infections in Australia.
澳大利亚抗菌药物耐药感染的疾病负担、相关死亡率及经济影响。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Jul 7;27:100521. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100521. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Prescribing antibiotics: Factors driving decision-making in general practice. A discrete choice experiment.开具抗生素处方:全科医疗决策的驱动因素。离散选择实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115033. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115033. Epub 2022 May 16.
5
Antibiotic use in Australian and Swedish primary care: a cross-country comparison.澳大利亚和瑞典初级保健中的抗生素使用:一项跨国比较。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Mar;40(1):95-103. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2036494. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
6
Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis.2019 年全球细菌对抗菌药物耐药性的负担:系统分析。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):629-655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
7
Comparing public attitudes, knowledge, beliefs and behaviours towards antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in Australia, United Kingdom, and Sweden (2010-2021): A systematic review, meta-analysis, and comparative policy analysis.比较澳大利亚、英国和瑞典三国公众对抗生素和抗微生物药物耐药性的态度、知识、信念和行为(2010-2021 年):系统评价、荟萃分析和比较政策分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0261917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261917. eCollection 2022.
8
Public preferences for delayed or immediate antibiotic prescriptions in UK primary care: A choice experiment.公众对英国初级保健中延迟或立即开抗生素处方的偏好:一项选择实验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Aug 30;18(8):e1003737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003737. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Preferences regarding antibiotic treatment and the role of antibiotic resistance: A discrete choice experiment.抗生素治疗偏好及抗生素耐药性的作用:一项离散选择实验。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Dec;56(6):106198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106198. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
10
Association between guidelines and medical practitioners' perception of best management for patients attending with an apparently uncomplicated acute sore throat: a cross-sectional survey in five countries.指南与医疗从业者对患有明显不复杂急性咽痛患者最佳管理方法的认知之间的关联:五个国家的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):e037884. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037884.