Suppr超能文献

一种基于新淋巴结比率的直肠乙状结肠癌分期系统:一项回顾性研究及外部验证。

A new lymph node ratio-based staging system for rectosigmoid cancer: a retrospective study with external validation.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Hernia Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2023 Oct 1;109(10):3087-3096. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000546.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the clinical value of a new American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging prediction model based on lymph node ratio (LNR) in rectosigmoid cancer (RSC).

METHODS

The analysis included 1444 patients with nonmetastatic RSC diagnosed pathologically between 2010 and 2016 who were collected from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Results database. The AJCC N-stage was redefined according to the LNR cutoff point, and the ability of the new staging system to predict prognosis was compared with that of the AJCC TNM staging system. Data from 739 patients from our hospital were used for external validation.

RESULTS

According to the number of examined lymph nodes and LNR, the N stage was divided into five groups (LNR0-5). The 5-year OS of patients divided according to the new T lymph node ratio M (TLNRM) staging into stage I (T1LNR1, T1LNR2), IIA (T1LNR3, T2LNR1, T2LNR2, T2LNR3, T1LNR4, T3LNR1), IIB (T2LNR4), IIC (T3LNR2, T4a LNR1, T1LNR5), IIIA (T3LNR3, T2LNR5, T4b LNR1, T4a LNR2, T3LNR4), IIIB (T3LNR5, T4a LNR3, T4a LNR4, T4b LNR2), and IIIC (T4b LNR3, T4a LNR5, T4b LNR4, T4b LNR5) was significantly different ( P <0.05). Decision curve analysis showed that the net income of the new TLNRM staging system for different decision thresholds was higher than the prediction line of the traditional eighth TNM staging system. The smaller Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information suggested that the new staging system had a higher sensitivity for predicting prognosis than the traditional staging system. TLNRM II and III patients benefited from adjuvant chemotherapy, while adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the prognosis of TNM II patients. These findings were confirmed by the external validation data.

CONCLUSION

The new TLNRM staging system was superior to the eighth edition AJCC staging system for staging and predicting the prognosis of patients with RSC and may become an effective tool in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了一种新的基于淋巴结比率(LNR)的美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)肿瘤淋巴结转移(TNM)分期预测模型在直肠乙状结肠癌(RSC)中的临床价值。

方法

分析纳入了 2010 年至 2016 年间国家癌症研究所监测、流行病学和结果数据库中经病理诊断为非转移性 RSC 的 1444 例患者。根据 LNR 截断值重新定义 AJCC N 期,比较新分期系统预测预后的能力与 AJCC TNM 分期系统的能力。来自我院的 739 例患者的数据用于外部验证。

结果

根据检查的淋巴结数量和 LNR,N 期分为五组(LNR0-5)。根据新的 T 淋巴结比率 M(TLNRM)分期将患者分为 I 期(T1LNR1、T1LNR2)、IIA 期(T1LNR3、T2LNR1、T2LNR2、T2LNR3、T1LNR4、T3LNR1)、IIB 期(T2LNR4)、IIC 期(T3LNR2、T4a LNR1、T1LNR5)、IIIA 期(T3LNR3、T2LNR5、T4b LNR1、T4a LNR2、T3LNR4)、IIIB 期(T3LNR5、T4a LNR3、T4a LNR4、T4b LNR2)和 IIIC 期(T4b LNR3、T4a LNR5、T4b LNR4、T4b LNR5),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。决策曲线分析显示,新的 TLNRM 分期系统在不同决策阈值下的净收益高于传统第八版 TNM 分期系统的预测线。较小的 Akaike 信息准则和贝叶斯信息表明,新的分期系统对预测预后的敏感性高于传统分期系统。TLNRM II 期和 III 期患者从辅助化疗中获益,而 TNM II 期患者接受辅助化疗并未改善预后。这些发现得到了外部验证数据的证实。

结论

新的 TLNRM 分期系统在 RSC 患者的分期和预后预测方面优于第八版 AJCC 分期系统,可能成为临床实践中的有效工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7966/10583910/2d70d609efcc/js9-109-3087-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验