Pei Jun-Peng, Zhang Rui, Zhang Nan-Nan, Zeng Yong-Ji, Sun Zhe, Ma Si-Ping, Zhou Jian-Guo, Li Xin-Xiang, Fan Jin, Zhu Ji, Abe Masanobu, Mei Zu-Bing, Shi Gang, Zhang Chun-Dong
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Oct;9(20):1513. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-3170.
Lymph node ratio (LNR) has advantages in predicting prognosis compared with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological N stage. However, the prognostic value of a novel T stage-lymph node ratio (TLNR) classification for colon cancer combining LNR and pathological primary tumor stage (T stage) is currently unknown.
We included 62,294 patients with stage I-III colon cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program as a training cohort. External validation was performed in 3,327 additional patients. A novel LNR stage was established and combined with T stage in a novel TLNR classification. Patients with similar survival were grouped according to T and LNR stages, with T1LNR1 as a reference.
We developed a novel TLNR classification as follows: stages I (T1LNR1-2, T1LNR4), IIA (T1LNR3, T2LNR1-2, T3LNR1), IIB (T1LNR5, T2LNR3-4, T3LNR2, T4aLNR1), IIC (T2LNR5, T3LNR3-4, T4aLNR2, T4bLNR1), IIIA (T3LNR5, T4aLNR3-4, T4bLNR2), IIIB (T4aLNR5, T4bLNR3-4), and IIIC (T4bLNR5). In the training cohort, the novel TLNR classification had better prognostic discrimination (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.621 0.608, two-sided P<0.001), superior model-fitting ability for predicting overall survival (Akaike information criteria, 561,129 562,052), and better net benefits compared with the AJCC 8 tumor/node/metastasis classification. Similar results were found in the validation cohort for predicting both overall and disease-free survival.
This novel TLNR classification may provide better prognostic discrimination, model-fitting ability, and net benefits than the AJCC 8 TNM classification, for potentially better stratification of patients with operable stage I-III colon cancer; however, further studies are required to validate the novel TLNR classification.
与美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)的病理N分期相比,淋巴结比率(LNR)在预测预后方面具有优势。然而,一种结合LNR和病理原发肿瘤分期(T分期)的新型结肠癌T分期-淋巴结比率(TLNR)分类的预后价值目前尚不清楚。
我们纳入了监测、流行病学和最终结果计划中的62294例I-III期结肠癌患者作为训练队列。另外3327例患者进行了外部验证。建立了一种新的LNR分期,并将其与T分期结合形成一种新的TLNR分类。根据T和LNR分期将生存情况相似的患者分组,以T1LNR1作为参照。
我们制定了如下新型TLNR分类:I期(T1LNR1-2,T1LNR4),IIA期(T1LNR3,T2LNR1-2,T3LNR1),IIB期(T1LNR5,T2LNR3-4,T3LNR2,T4aLNR1),IIC期(T2LNR5,T3LNR3-4,T4aLNR2,T4bLNR1),IIIA期(T3LNR5,T4aLNR3-4,T4bLNR2),IIIB期(T4aLNR5,T4bLNR3-4),IIIC期(T4bLNR5)。在训练队列中,新型TLNR分类具有更好的预后判别能力(受试者操作特征曲线下面积,0.621对0.608,双侧P<0.001),在预测总生存期方面具有更好的模型拟合能力(赤池信息准则,561129对562052),并且与AJCC第8版肿瘤/淋巴结/转移分类相比具有更好的净效益。在验证队列中,对于总生存期和无病生存期的预测也发现了类似结果。
这种新型TLNR分类可能比AJCC第8版TNM分类具有更好的预后判别能力、模型拟合能力和净效益,有可能对可手术的I-III期结肠癌患者进行更好的分层;然而,需要进一步研究来验证这种新型TLNR分类。