Brukman Shelley, Ferguson Makenzie J, Zaky Kimberly D, Knudsen-Robbins Chloe, Heyming Theodore W
Children's Hospital of Orange County, Department of Trauma Surgery, Orange, CA.
University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 31;8(1):SG1-SG21. doi: 10.21980/J84H1C. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Emergency medical service (EMS) providers and other health care professionals.
In 2019 alone, 656,000 children in the United States were victims of child abuse and neglect.1 The medical community has historically struggled with the identification of child maltreatment. In one study, 33% of abused children had a previous visit with a medical provider in which the abuse was found to have been missed.2 Many voices in the healthcare community have advocated for the implementation of routine screening, and studies have demonstrated the implementation of such screening in the emergency department (ED) increases the detection of child maltreatment.3-7 Child maltreatment screening tools are increasingly utilized in primary care and ED settings, but one has yet to be adapted or designed for universal use by emergency medical services (EMS) professionals in the prehospital care context. Because EMS providers are uniquely positioned to assess for maltreatment, they have traditionally been the only provider to interact with families in the home environment. Unfortunately, EMS rates of documentation of maltreatment is quite low. A recent study using the National Emergency Medical Services Information System database to evaluate EMS documentation of child maltreatment in patients ≤3 years of age compared to the national incidence of known maltreatment found an almost 15-fold discrepancy.8 There have been several attempts to elucidate the difficulties of and barriers to reporting by EMS providers. Markenson et al and Tiyyagura et al outlined several areas that potentially contribute to a lack of reporting: minimal continuing medical education (CME) on child maltreatment, knowledge of physical and historical details suspicious for abuse, knowledge of child development, limited clinical evaluation time in a fast-paced work environment, understanding of how to appropriately interact with families, and fear of being wrong.9,10 This class/escape room activity was developed to directly address several of these areas. Emergency medical service providers participate in traditional didactics (in the form of a short lecture), followed by an escape room activity in which they further explore and reinforce learning in a fun and memorable environment. This activity also promotes teamwork, an especially important skill in potentially complex and difficult situations such as those surrounding suspected child maltreatment.
By the end of the escape room, the learner should be able to: 1) understand the national and local prevalence of child maltreatment; 2) understand the different types of child maltreatment and common associated presentations; 3) know the local EMS agency reporting requirements; 4) understand when to make base hospital contact with respect to concern for maltreatment; 5) collaborate effectively as a team.
Child maltreatment can be a sensitive and challenging topic. In this class, we presented learners with a short, 15-minute lecture (see Pre-Escape Room Lecture PowerPoint) followed by an escape room activity. The Pre-Escape Room Lecture PowerPoint includes suggestions on the type of image and/or statistics to include on each slide, which can be taken from your site's available de-identified photos and information. The lecture included material describing national and local statistics on child maltreatment, definitions of abuse, and techniques to help identify concern for maltreatment. Learners were free to ask questions following lecture. They were then divided into their assigned crews/teams for the escape room activity. The puzzles in the escape room served to reinforce concepts and details presented in lecture. We held a debrief after the escape room activity to discuss puzzle answers and address any follow-up questions.
Learners completed a program evaluation after the activity. These questions assessed the learners' perception of the importance and applicability of the content presented, the escape room format, and what they felt was the most significant and helpful to their practice.
Learners reported enjoying the activity and felt the escape room-based approach allowed for deeper engagement with the topic since the serious nature of child maltreatment can sometimes make this difficult.
Pediatric abuse and neglect is a serious and often heavy topic to present to healthcare providers. While we took into consideration that presenting a sensitive topic such as child abuse in an escape room format may be perceived as insensitive or display a lack of insight or respect for the topic, we also understood that the way we built out the clues and puzzles would be important in how the game was perceived by the participants. By building the puzzles to be factual and not overly excessive, we allowed the learners to interact with the information and practice identifying possible cases of abuse and how and when to report suspicions in a manner that did not trivialize the seriousness of the topic or take away from the fact that they were competing in a game. We used a PowerPoint lecture to present the foundation of the content and then lightened the learning session with the use of the escape room activity. The level of competition and comradery lightened the overall mood, and the learners left the class on a high note.
Child abuse recognition, escape room activity, small-group activity, prehospital, neglect, physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, mandated reporter.
紧急医疗服务(EMS)提供者及其他医疗保健专业人员。
仅在2019年,美国就有65.6万名儿童成为虐待和忽视儿童行为的受害者。1历史上,医学界在识别儿童虐待方面一直面临困难。在一项研究中,33%受虐待儿童此前曾就医,但虐待行为被漏诊。2医疗保健界的许多人主张实施常规筛查,研究表明,在急诊科(ED)实施此类筛查可增加对儿童虐待行为的检测。3 - 7儿童虐待筛查工具在初级保健和急诊科环境中越来越多地被使用,但尚未有适用于紧急医疗服务(EMS)专业人员在院前护理环境中普遍使用的工具。由于EMS提供者处于评估虐待行为的独特位置,他们传统上是唯一在家庭环境中与家庭互动的提供者。不幸的是,EMS对虐待行为的记录率相当低。最近一项研究使用国家紧急医疗服务信息系统数据库评估了3岁及以下患者中EMS对儿童虐待行为的记录情况,并与已知虐待行为的全国发生率进行比较,发现两者相差近15倍。8已经有几次尝试阐明EMS提供者报告困难和障碍。Markenson等人以及Tiyyagura等人概述了几个可能导致报告不足的领域:关于儿童虐待的继续医学教育(CME)极少、对可疑虐待的身体和病史细节的了解、儿童发育知识、快节奏工作环境中有限的临床评估时间、对如何与家庭进行适当互动的理解以及害怕犯错。9,10本次课程/密室逃脱活动旨在直接解决其中几个领域的问题。紧急医疗服务提供者先参加传统教学(以简短讲座的形式),然后参与密室逃脱活动,在有趣且令人难忘的环境中进一步探索和强化所学内容。该活动还促进团队合作,这在诸如围绕疑似儿童虐待的潜在复杂和困难情况中是一项特别重要的技能。
在密室逃脱活动结束时,学习者应能够:1)了解儿童虐待的全国及当地患病率;2)了解儿童虐待的不同类型及常见相关表现;3)知晓当地EMS机构的报告要求;4)了解在担心存在虐待行为时何时与基地医院联系;5)有效地进行团队协作。
儿童虐待可能是一个敏感且具有挑战性的话题。在本次课程中,我们先为学习者进行了15分钟的简短讲座(见密室逃脱前讲座幻灯片),然后开展密室逃脱活动。密室逃脱前讲座幻灯片包含了关于每张幻灯片应包含的图像和/或统计数据类型的建议,这些可以从您所在机构提供的去识别化照片和信息中获取。讲座内容包括描述儿童虐待的全国及当地统计数据、虐待的定义以及帮助识别虐待担忧的技巧。学习者在讲座后可自由提问。然后他们被分成指定的小组/团队参加密室逃脱活动。密室逃脱中的谜题用于强化讲座中呈现的概念和细节。密室逃脱活动结束后,我们进行了总结讨论,以讨论谜题答案并解答任何后续问题。
学习者在活动结束后完成了项目评估。这些问题评估了学习者对所呈现内容的重要性和适用性、密室逃脱形式的看法,以及他们认为对其实践最有意义和帮助的内容。
学习者表示喜欢该活动,并认为基于密室逃脱的方法能让他们更深入地参与该主题,因为儿童虐待的严肃性质有时会使这变得困难。
儿科虐待和忽视是一个严肃且通常沉重的话题,不宜向医疗保健提供者呈现。虽然我们考虑到以密室逃脱形式呈现诸如儿童虐待这样的敏感话题可能会被视为麻木不仁,或者显示出对该话题缺乏洞察力或尊重,但我们也明白构建线索和谜题的方式对于参与者如何看待游戏很重要。通过构建基于事实且不过分夸张的谜题,我们让学习者能够与信息互动,并练习识别可能的虐待案例以及如何及何时报告疑虑,同时又不会轻视该话题的严肃性,也不会让人觉得他们只是在参与一场游戏。我们使用幻灯片讲座来呈现内容基础,然后通过密室逃脱活动使学习过程轻松起来。竞争和同志情谊的氛围使整体情绪轻松愉悦,学习者们带着高昂的情绪离开课堂。
儿童虐待识别、密室逃脱活动、小组活动、院前护理、忽视、身体虐待、情感虐待、性虐待、强制报告人