• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中东欧国家,关于患者参与卫生技术评估的建议。

Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries.

机构信息

Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.

Patient advocate, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 3;11:1176200. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200
PMID:37465169
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10350487/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Meaningful patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in ensuring that the interests of the affected patient population, their families, and the general public are accurately reflected in coverage and reimbursement decisions. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are generally at less advanced stages of implementing HTA, which is particularly true for patient involvement activities. As part of the Horizon2020 HTx project, this research aimed to form recommendations for critical barriers to patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries.

METHODS

Built on previous research findings on potential barriers, a prioritisation survey was conducted online with CEE stakeholders. Recommendations for prioritised barriers were formed through a face-to-face workshop by CEE stakeholders and HTx experts.

RESULTS

A total of 105 stakeholders from 13 CEE countries completed the prioritisation survey and identified 12 of the 22 potential barriers as highly important. The workshop had 36 participants representing 9 CEE countries, and 5 Western European countries coming together to discuss solutions in order to form recommendations based on best practices, real-life experience, and transferability aspects. Stakeholder groups involved in both phases included HTA organisation representatives, payers, patients, caregivers, patient organisation representatives, patient experts, health care providers, academic and non-academic researchers, health care consultants and health technology manufacturers/providers. As a result, 12 recommendations were formed specified to the CEE region's context, but potentially useful for a broader geographic audience.

CONCLUSION

In this paper, we present 12 recommendations for meaningful, systematic, and sustainable patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries. Our hope is that engaging more than a hundred CEE stakeholders in the study helped to spread awareness of the importance and potential of patient involvement and that the resulting recommendations provide tangible steps for the way forward. Future studies shall focus on country-specific case studies of the implemented recommendations.

摘要

简介

在确保受影响患者群体、其家属和公众的利益在覆盖范围和报销决策中得到准确反映方面,让患者有意义地参与卫生技术评估(HTA)至关重要。中东欧(CEE)国家在实施 HTA 方面普遍处于较落后的阶段,患者参与活动更是如此。作为 Horizon2020 HTx 项目的一部分,本研究旨在为 CEE 国家患者参与 HTA 的关键障碍提出建议。

方法

在先前关于潜在障碍的研究结果的基础上,与 CEE 利益相关者进行了在线优先排序调查。通过 CEE 利益相关者和 HTx 专家的面对面研讨会,形成了对优先障碍的建议。

结果

共有来自 13 个 CEE 国家的 105 名利益相关者完成了优先排序调查,并确定了 22 个潜在障碍中的 12 个为高度重要。研讨会有 36 名参与者,代表 9 个 CEE 国家,以及 5 个来自西欧的国家,共同讨论解决方案,以便根据最佳实践、实际经验和可转移性方面形成建议。参与两个阶段的利益相关者群体包括 HTA 组织代表、支付方、患者、护理人员、患者组织代表、患者专家、医疗保健提供者、学术和非学术研究人员、医疗保健顾问和医疗技术制造商/供应商。因此,形成了 12 项针对 CEE 地区背景的建议,但对更广泛的地理受众可能也有用。

结论

在本文中,我们为 CEE 国家有意义、系统和可持续地让患者参与 HTA 提出了 12 项建议。我们希望,有 100 多名 CEE 利益相关者参与这项研究有助于提高人们对患者参与的重要性和潜力的认识,而由此产生的建议为前进的道路提供了切实可行的步骤。未来的研究应侧重于实施建议的特定国家案例研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a09b/10350487/42fcd82ad77b/fpubh-11-1176200-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a09b/10350487/2eee0977c3ef/fpubh-11-1176200-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a09b/10350487/42fcd82ad77b/fpubh-11-1176200-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a09b/10350487/2eee0977c3ef/fpubh-11-1176200-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a09b/10350487/42fcd82ad77b/fpubh-11-1176200-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries.在中东欧国家,关于患者参与卫生技术评估的建议。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 3;11:1176200. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200. eCollection 2023.
2
Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries.中东欧国家中患者参与健康技术评估的潜在障碍。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;10:922708. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922708. eCollection 2022.
3
Recommendations to overcome barriers to the use of artificial intelligence-driven evidence in health technology assessment.克服人工智能驱动的证据在健康技术评估中应用障碍的建议。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 26;11:1088121. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1088121. eCollection 2023.
4
Quo Vadis HTA for Medical Devices in Central and Eastern Europe? Recommendations to Address Methodological Challenges.医疗设备在中东欧的 HTA 走向何方?解决方法学挑战的建议。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;8:612410. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.612410. eCollection 2020.
5
Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries.中东欧国家罕见病药物评估标准的系统评价
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Jun 4;11(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0455-6.
6
Health technology assessment in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria.波兰、捷克共和国、匈牙利、罗马尼亚和保加利亚的卫生技术评估。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 May;15 Suppl 1:S13-25. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0590-8. Epub 2014 May 16.
7
Guidance on using real-world evidence from Western Europe in Central and Eastern European health policy decision making.关于在中东欧卫生政策决策中使用来自西欧的真实世界证据的指南。
J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Apr;12(4):e220157. doi: 10.57264/cer-2022-0157. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
8
HTA Implementation Roadmap in Central and Eastern European Countries.中东欧国家的卫生技术评估实施路线图。
Health Econ. 2016 Feb;25 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):179-92. doi: 10.1002/hec.3298. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
9
Role of health technology assessment in the process of implementation of the EU Transparency Directive: relevant experience from Central Eastern European countries.卫生技术评估在实施欧盟透明度指令过程中的作用:来自中东欧国家的相关经验。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Jun;12(3):283-7. doi: 10.1586/erp.12.12.
10
Implementation of coverage with evidence development schemes for medical devices: A decision tool for late technology adopter countries.医疗器械证据开发计划覆盖的实施:晚期技术采用国的决策工具。
Health Econ. 2022 Sep;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):195-206. doi: 10.1002/hec.4504. Epub 2022 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Plain language summaries supporting patient involvement: lessons and guidance from HTAi Patient and Citizen Involvement Interest Group (PCIG).支持患者参与的通俗易懂的总结:来自国际卫生技术评估机构患者及公民参与兴趣小组(PCIG)的经验与指导。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Jul 29;41(1):e59. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325100408.
2
Optimizing Patient Access to Orphan Medicinal Products: Lessons from Central and Eastern Europe.优化患者获取孤儿药的途径:来自中东欧的经验教训。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 May 26;13(2):24. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13020024. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Patient Engagement and Patient Experience Data in Regulatory Review and Health Technology Assessment: Where Are We Today?

本文引用的文献

1
Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries.中东欧国家中患者参与健康技术评估的潜在障碍。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;10:922708. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922708. eCollection 2022.
2
Integrating Empirical Analysis and Normative Inquiry in Health Technology Assessment: The Values in Doing Assessments of Health Technologies Approach.将实证分析与规范探究整合于卫生技术评估:卫生技术评估方法中的评估价值观
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Jun 23;38(1):e52. doi: 10.1017/S0266462321001768.
3
Proposal for capturing patient experience through extended value frameworks of health technologies.
监管审查和卫生技术评估中的患者参与度与患者体验数据:我们如今处于什么阶段?
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00770-6.
4
Navigating barriers to health technology assessment development in Iran: a qualitative exploration of stakeholder perspectives.应对伊朗卫生技术评估发展的障碍:对利益相关者观点的定性探索。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Mar 27;83(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01566-8.
5
Preferences for public health insurance coverage of new anticancer drugs: a discrete choice experiment among non-small cell lung cancer patients in China.新型抗癌药物公共医疗保险覆盖范围的偏好:中国非小细胞肺癌患者的离散选择实验
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 15;25(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20951-6.
6
Involving Patients in Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment of Innovative Medical Devices: Adapting to a Specific Local Context and Lessons Learned From the Assessment of an Ex Vivo Perfusion System of Human Donor Hearts.让患者参与基于医院的创新医疗设备卫生技术评估:适应特定的当地情况以及从人体供体心脏体外灌注系统评估中吸取的经验教训。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70119. doi: 10.1111/hex.70119.
7
From Innovator Result-driven to Multi-actor Impact-oriented Public-Private Partnerships: Integrating the Patient Perspective.从创新者导向的结果驱动型到多方利益相关者导向的注重影响力的公私合作伙伴关系:整合患者视角。
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2024;286:137-168. doi: 10.1007/164_2024_730.
8
Availability and Access to Orphan Drugs for Rare Cancers in Bulgaria: Analysis of Delays and Public Expenditures.保加利亚罕见癌症孤儿药的可及性与获取情况:延误及公共支出分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 12;16(8):1489. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081489.
通过扩展健康技术的价值框架来获取患者体验的建议。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Jul;27(7):936-947. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.7.936.
4
Valuing patient engagement: Reflexive learning in evidence generation practices for health technology assessment.重视患者参与:健康技术评估证据生成实践中的反思性学习。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;280:114048. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114048. Epub 2021 May 21.
5
Sustaining Meaningful Patient Engagement Across the Lifecycle of Medicines: A Roadmap for Action.贯穿药品全生命周期的有意义的患者参与:行动路线图。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Sep;55(5):936-953. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00282-z. Epub 2021 May 10.
6
The Role of Patient Experience in the Value Assessment of Complex Technologies - Do HTA Bodies Need to Reconsider How Value is Assessed?患者体验在复杂技术价值评估中的作用——卫生技术评估机构是否需要重新考虑价值评估方式?
Health Policy. 2021 May;125(5):593-601. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
7
Development of a decisional flowchart for meaningful patient involvement in Health Technology Assessment.制定决策流程图以实现患者在卫生技术评估中的有意义参与。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Dec 3;37:e3. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320001956.
8
Patient-relevant outcomes: what are we talking about? A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity.患者相关结局:我们在讨论什么?一项改善概念清晰度的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05442-9.
9
The transferability of health technology assessment: the European perspective with focus on central and Eastern European countries.卫生技术评估的可转移性:聚焦中东欧国家的欧洲视角
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Aug;20(4):321-330. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1779061. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
10
The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration.新的健康技术评估定义:国际合作的里程碑。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jun;36(3):187-190. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000215. Epub 2020 May 13.