• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贯穿药品全生命周期的有意义的患者参与:行动路线图。

Sustaining Meaningful Patient Engagement Across the Lifecycle of Medicines: A Roadmap for Action.

机构信息

EURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe, Paris, France.

Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Rd, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Sep;55(5):936-953. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00282-z. Epub 2021 May 10.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-021-00282-z
PMID:33970465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8108434/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increased recognition that incorporating patients' perspectives and insights into the medicines development process results in better health outcomes and benefits for all involved stakeholders. Despite the increased interest and the existence of frameworks and practical recommendations, patient engagement (PE) is not yet considered standard practice. The objective of this work was to provide a roadmap to support systematic change in all stakeholder organisations involved in medicines development across Europe, patients and patient organisations, medicines developers, academia, regulatory authorities, Health Technology Assessment bodies, payers, policy-makers and public research funders, to sustain PE practices.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach was used by the EU-funded Innovative Medicines Initiative PARADIGM Consortium to co-develop the sustainability roadmap including background work to identify success factors and scenarios for sustainable PE. The roadmap development was based on the Theory of Change concept and populated with findings from (1) interviews with national/ and international institutions with the potential to increase PE uptake by other stakeholders; (2) multi-stakeholder workshops and webinars; and (3) consultations with specific stakeholder groups, Consortium members and a consultative body formed by international PE initiatives.

RESULTS

This roadmap sets strategic goals for the PE community to achieve meaningful and systematic PE through changes in the culture, processes and resources of stakeholder organisations. It brings in key PARADIGM outputs to work in a coordinated fashion with existing frameworks and mechanisms to achieve system-wide sustained PE.

CONCLUSIONS

The roadmap provides a framework for all stakeholders to take collective action within their organisations and across Europe to implement PE in a sustainable manner.

摘要

背景

越来越多的人认识到,将患者的观点和见解纳入药物开发过程中,会为所有相关利益攸关方带来更好的健康结果和收益。尽管人们的兴趣日益浓厚,并且已经存在框架和实际建议,但患者参与(PE)尚未被视为标准做法。这项工作的目的是为支持欧洲所有参与药物开发的利益相关者组织(患者和患者组织、药物开发商、学术界、监管机构、卫生技术评估机构、支付方、政策制定者和公共研究资助者)进行系统变革提供路线图,以维持 PE 实践。

方法

欧盟资助的创新药物倡议 PARADIGM 联盟采用混合方法来共同制定可持续性路线图,包括确定成功因素和可持续 PE 情景的背景工作。路线图的制定基于变革理论的概念,并结合(1)对有潜力提高其他利益相关者参与度的国家/国际机构的访谈;(2)多利益攸关方研讨会和网络研讨会;以及(3)与特定利益攸关方群体、联盟成员和由国际 PE 倡议组成的咨询机构的磋商的调查结果。

结果

该路线图为 PE 社区设定了战略目标,通过改变利益攸关方组织的文化、流程和资源,实现有意义和系统的 PE。它引入了关键的 PARADIGM 产出,以协调的方式与现有框架和机制合作,实现全系统的可持续 PE。

结论

该路线图为所有利益攸关方提供了一个框架,以便在其组织内部以及整个欧洲采取集体行动,以可持续的方式实施 PE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/7a8a7e1eb094/43441_2021_282_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/47a04f4f0383/43441_2021_282_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/8a18401ce44b/43441_2021_282_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/4d716c42a268/43441_2021_282_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/dc685c5d4c23/43441_2021_282_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/ff46da4220c8/43441_2021_282_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/914bee317d39/43441_2021_282_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/7a8a7e1eb094/43441_2021_282_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/47a04f4f0383/43441_2021_282_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/8a18401ce44b/43441_2021_282_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/4d716c42a268/43441_2021_282_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/dc685c5d4c23/43441_2021_282_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/ff46da4220c8/43441_2021_282_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/914bee317d39/43441_2021_282_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7746/8332604/7a8a7e1eb094/43441_2021_282_Figb_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sustaining Meaningful Patient Engagement Across the Lifecycle of Medicines: A Roadmap for Action.贯穿药品全生命周期的有意义的患者参与:行动路线图。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Sep;55(5):936-953. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00282-z. Epub 2021 May 10.
2
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
3
Valuing patient engagement: Reflexive learning in evidence generation practices for health technology assessment.重视患者参与:健康技术评估证据生成实践中的反思性学习。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;280:114048. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114048. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
Co-creation of the Global Patient Experience Data Navigator: a multi-stakeholder initiative to ensure the patient voice is represented in health decision-making.全球患者体验数据导航器的共同创建:一项多利益相关方倡议,以确保患者的声音在健康决策中得到体现。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00503-9.
5
Co-creation of practical "how-to guides" for patient engagement in key phases of medicines development-from theory to implementation.共同创建实用的“操作指南”,以促进患者在药物研发关键阶段的参与——从理论到实践。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Aug 23;7(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00294-x.
6
Co-creation of patient engagement quality guidance for medicines development: an international multistakeholder initiative.共同制定药物研发患者参与质量指南:一项国际多利益相关方倡议。
BMJ Innov. 2019 Jan;5(1):43-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2018-000317. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
7
What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: Are these expectations being met?利益相关者对患者参与有哪些期望:这些期望得到满足了吗?
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1035-1045. doi: 10.1111/hex.12797. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
8
Understanding multi-stakeholder needs, preferences and expectations to define effective practices and processes of patient engagement in medicine development: A mixed-methods study.了解多方利益相关者的需求、偏好和期望,以定义药物研发中患者参与的有效实践和流程:一项混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):601-616. doi: 10.1111/hex.13207. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Patient Engagement and Patient Experience Data in Regulatory Review and Health Technology Assessment: A Global Landscape Review.监管审查和卫生技术评估中的患者参与和患者体验数据:全球概况综述。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Jan;58(1):63-78. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00573-7. Epub 2023 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating Patient Needs and Perspectives in Additional Risk Minimization Measures and Other Pharmacovigilance Deliverables - A Framework and Implementation Roadmap.将患者需求和观点纳入额外的风险最小化措施及其他药物警戒工作成果——一个框架和实施路线图
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00844-5.
2
Results of a patient engagement training for health advisors: a study of self-perceived competency enhancements.健康顾问患者参与培训的结果:自我感知能力提升的研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 23;11(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00711-5.
3
Widening Patient Engagement for Rare Disease Drug Trials: The Perspectives of Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis on Participating in Clinical Drug Trials and Drug Trial Design.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient and public involvement in mental health research: En route to maturity?患者及公众参与心理健康研究:走向成熟之路?
Health Expect. 2021 May;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-2. doi: 10.1111/hex.13250.
2
Evaluation of patient engagement in medicine development: A multi-stakeholder framework with metrics.评估患者参与医学研发:一个带有指标的多利益相关方框架。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):491-506. doi: 10.1111/hex.13191. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
3
Care during covid-19 must be humane and person centred.新冠疫情期间的护理必须人道且以患者为中心。
扩大罕见病药物试验的患者参与度:特发性肺纤维化患者对参与临床药物试验及药物试验设计的看法。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70260. doi: 10.1111/hex.70260.
4
Do We Understand Unmet Need? A Proposal to Use Length-Of-Life Equivalent (LOLE) as a Patient-Centric Measure of Unmet Need.我们理解未满足的需求吗?一项关于使用寿命等效长度(LOLE)作为以患者为中心的未满足需求衡量指标的提议。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 May;9(3):341-350. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00560-8. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
5
A Unified Set of Patient-inspired Health Concepts for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A North Star for Understanding Treatment Benefit.一套以患者为灵感的慢性阻塞性肺疾病健康概念:理解治疗益处的北极星。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Mar;22(3):317-321. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202408-864IP.
6
Measuring and Demonstrating the Value of Patient Engagement Across the Medicines Lifecycle: A Patient Engagement Impact Measurement Framework.衡量并展示患者在药物全生命周期参与中的价值:患者参与影响衡量框架
Patient. 2025 Jan;18(1):3-18. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00713-7. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
7
From Innovator Result-driven to Multi-actor Impact-oriented Public-Private Partnerships: Integrating the Patient Perspective.从创新者导向的结果驱动型到多方利益相关者导向的注重影响力的公私合作伙伴关系:整合患者视角。
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2024;286:137-168. doi: 10.1007/164_2024_730.
8
Patient organisations' views, motivations and experiences on patient involvement in cancer research: a pilot study in Portugal.患者组织对患者参与癌症研究的看法、动机和经验:葡萄牙的一项试点研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 24;14(1):e077444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077444.
9
Promoting Collaboration of Regulators and Patients in Improving Drug Safety and Regulatory Decision Making.促进监管机构和患者在改善药物安全性和监管决策方面的合作。
Drug Saf. 2024 Mar;47(3):217-225. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01385-2. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
10
Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries.在中东欧国家,关于患者参与卫生技术评估的建议。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 3;11:1176200. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200. eCollection 2023.
BMJ. 2020 Sep 8;370:m3483. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3483.
4
Evaluation of the Content Validity and Cross-Cultural Validity of the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire (SPFQ).研究参与者反馈问卷(SPFQ)的内容效度和跨文化效度评估。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Nov;54(6):1522-1533. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00179-3. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
5
Integrating public preferences into national reimbursement decisions: a descriptive comparison of approaches in Belgium and New Zealand.将公众偏好纳入国家报销决策中:比利时和新西兰方法的描述性比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05152-2.
6
Engaging patients in medicines regulation: a tale of two agencies.让患者参与药品监管:两个机构的故事。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Nov;18(12):885-886. doi: 10.1038/d41573-019-00164-y.
7
Co-creation of patient engagement quality guidance for medicines development: an international multistakeholder initiative.共同制定药物研发患者参与质量指南:一项国际多利益相关方倡议。
BMJ Innov. 2019 Jan;5(1):43-55. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2018-000317. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
8
Opportunities and challenges for the inclusion of patient preferences in the medical product life cycle: a systematic review.将患者偏好纳入医疗产品生命周期的机遇与挑战:系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Oct 4;19(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0875-z.
9
Evaluating the "return on patient engagement initiatives" in medicines research and development: A literature review.评估药品研发中“患者参与举措的回报”:文献综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):5-18. doi: 10.1111/hex.12951. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
Patient Engagement at a Tipping Point-The Need for Cultural Change Across Patient, Sponsor, and Regulator Stakeholders: Insights From the DIA Conference, "Patient Engagement in Benefit Risk Assessment Throughout the Life Cycle of Medical Products".患者参与度处于临界点——患者、申办方和监管方利益相关者之间文化变革的必要性:来自DIA会议“医疗产品全生命周期中患者参与获益-风险评估”的见解
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Sep;50(5):546-553. doi: 10.1177/2168479016662902.