From the Department of Surgery.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
J Patient Saf. 2023 Oct 1;19(7):422-428. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001151. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
Patient safety incident reporting in our institution's intensive care units (ICUs) had fallen 30% below national benchmarks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Underreporting diminishes awareness of risks and precludes organizational learning from near misses. We aimed to increase the ICU number of patient safety incident reports by 30% from 27 to 35 reports/1000 patient-days without negatively impacting culture of safety as measured by patient-care staff surveys.
Single-institution prospective interventional study with 9 ICUs receiving a multifaceted intervention developed using quality improvement methodology during February-April 2022. Study intervention involved creation of patient safety peer-leadership role, feedback process, interactive dashboards for patient safety data, and education resources accessible via quick response codes. Primary outcome was patient safety incident reports/1000 patient-days. Intensive care unit patient-care staff culture of safety was assessed with surveys.
Intensive care unit patient safety incident reporting increased by 48% after intervention (40 versus 27 reports/1000 patient-days [ P = 0.136]). Near misses were the most common incident report. Intensive care unit patient-care staff ratings of patient safety did not change; 80% rated patient safety as good or better after intervention versus 78% at baseline ( P = 0.465). However, significant improvement was observed for subcomponents related to learning culture and support for staff involved in patient safety incidents. Most reports (>80%) were submitted by nurses.
This multifaceted quality improvement intervention increased patient safety incident reporting in the ICUs. Increases in ratings of learning culture and support for staff underline the importance of a well-functioning patient safety incident reporting system in an institutional culture of safety.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我院重症监护病房(ICU)的患者安全事件报告下降了 30%,低于全国基准。漏报会降低对风险的认识,并阻止组织从近错过中学习。我们的目标是将 ICU 的患者安全事件报告数量从 27 份增加到 35 份/1000 患者天,而不会对患者护理人员调查所衡量的安全文化产生负面影响。
这是一项单机构前瞻性干预研究,共有 9 个 ICU 接受了使用质量改进方法制定的多方面干预措施,该研究于 2022 年 2 月至 4 月进行。研究干预措施包括创建患者安全同行领导角色、反馈流程、患者安全数据交互仪表板以及通过快速响应码访问的教育资源。主要结果是患者安全事件报告/1000 患者天。通过调查评估 ICU 患者护理人员的安全文化。
干预后 ICU 的患者安全事件报告增加了 48%(40 份与 27 份报告/1000 患者天[P=0.136])。接近失误是最常见的事件报告。ICU 患者护理人员对患者安全的评分没有变化;干预后 80%的人认为患者安全状况良好或更好,而基线时为 78%(P=0.465)。然而,与学习文化和支持参与患者安全事件的员工相关的子组件观察到显著改善。大多数报告(超过 80%)是由护士提交的。
这项多方面的质量改进干预措施增加了 ICU 的患者安全事件报告。学习文化和支持员工的评分增加强调了在安全文化中,运作良好的患者安全事件报告系统的重要性。