School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510631, PR China; The Guidance Centre for Student Development, Dongguan High School, Dongguan, Guangdong 523120, PR China.
Centre for Psychological Health Education, Zhongshan Technician College, Zhongshan, Guangdong 528400, PR China.
J Affect Disord. 2023 Oct 15;339:867-876. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.07.069. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
The purpose of study was to explore the roles of psychological inflexibility and rejection sensitivity in the relationship between (cognitive and affective) empathy and social anxiety among adolescents.
A two-wave longitudinal design was adopted in the present study. A total of 2481 participants (41.60 % male; Mage = 16.48) aged from 13 to 21 in 2021 completed the Chinese Version of Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI-C), Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ), Chinese version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y8), Child Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire (CRSQ), and Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescent (SAS-A) at baseline assessment (T1), and completed the SAS-A again three months later (T2).
(1) Results showed, personal distress at T1 could significantly and positively predict social anxiety at T2. (2) Mediation analyses results demonstrated that adolescents' experience avoidance and rejection sensitivity at T1 were significant mediators between cognitive empathy at T1 and social anxiety at T2, but with the opposite effect. As for affective empathy, rejection sensitivity at T1 significantly mediated the relationship between adolescents' empathic concern at T1 and social anxiety at T2. Furthermore, experience avoidance and rejection sensitivity at T1 significantly mediated the association between personal distress at T1 and social anxiety at T2.
Cognitive and affective empathy had different roles in contributing to adolescents' social anxiety. The findings in the current study can also provide empirical support for targeting adolescents' social anxiety by reducing personal distress directly and decreasing experiential avoidance and rejection sensitivity indirectly.
本研究旨在探讨心理不灵活性和拒绝敏感性在青少年认知和情感同理心与社交焦虑之间的关系中的作用。
本研究采用了两波纵向设计。2021 年,共有 2481 名年龄在 13 至 21 岁的参与者(41.60%为男性;Mage=16.48)完成了中文版人际反应性指数(IRI-C)、短期情绪和感觉问卷(SMFQ)、中文版接受与行动问卷-II(AAQ-II)、青年回避与融合问卷(AFQ-Y8)、儿童拒绝敏感性问卷(CRSQ)和青少年社交焦虑量表(SAS-A)的基线评估(T1),并在三个月后(T2)再次完成了 SAS-A。
(1)结果表明,T1 时的个人困扰可以显著正向预测 T2 时的社交焦虑。(2)中介分析结果表明,T1 时青少年的体验回避和拒绝敏感性是 T1 时认知同理心与 T2 时社交焦虑之间的显著中介变量,但作用相反。对于情感同理心,T1 时的拒绝敏感性显著中介了 T1 时青少年共情关心与 T2 时社交焦虑之间的关系。此外,T1 时的体验回避和拒绝敏感性也显著中介了 T1 时个人困扰与 T2 时社交焦虑之间的关系。
认知和情感同理心在导致青少年社交焦虑方面发挥了不同的作用。本研究的发现也为通过直接降低个人困扰,间接减少体验回避和拒绝敏感性来靶向青少年社交焦虑提供了实证支持。