Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023 Nov;34(11):1997-2005.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
To compare secondary outcomes after ablation (AB), surgical resection (SR), and liver transplant (LT) for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), including resource utilization and adverse event (AE) rates.
Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER)-Medicare, HCCs <5 cm that were treated with AB, SR, or LT in 2009-2016 (n = 1,067) were identified using Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes through Medicare claims. Index procedure length of stay, need for intensive care unit (ICU) level care, readmission rates, and AE rates at 30 and 90 days were compared using chi-square tests or Fisher exact tests. Examined AEs included hemorrhage, abscess formation, biliary injury, pneumonia, sepsis, liver disease-related AEs, liver failure, and anesthesia-related AEs, identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/10th Revision, codes.
The median length of stay for initial treatment was 1 day, 6 days, and 7 days for AB, SR, and LT, respectively (P < .001). During initial hospital stay, 5.0%, 40.8%, and 63.4% of AB, SR, and LT cohorts, respectively, received ICU-level care (P < .001). By 30 and 90 days, there were significant differences among the AB, SR, and LT cohorts in the rate of postprocedural hemorrhage, abscess formation, biliary injury, pneumonia, sepsis, liver disease-related AEs, and anesthesia-related AEs (P < .05). By 90 days, the readmission rates after AB, SR, and LT were 18.6%, 28.2%, and 40.6% (P < .001), respectively.
AB results in significantly less healthcare utilization during the initial 90 days after procedure compared with that after SR and LT due to shorter length of stay, lower intensity care, fewer readmissions, and fewer AEs.
比较消融术(AB)、手术切除术(SR)和肝移植(LT)治疗小肝细胞癌(HCC)的次要转归,包括资源利用和不良事件(AE)发生率。
利用监测、流行病学和最终结果计划(SEER)-医疗保险,通过医疗保险索赔使用医疗保健通用程序编码系统代码从 2009 年至 2016 年确定 HCCs<5cm 的患者接受 AB、SR 或 LT 治疗(n=1067)。使用卡方检验或 Fisher 确切检验比较初始治疗的住院时间、需要重症监护病房(ICU)级护理、再入院率和 30 天和 90 天的 AE 发生率。检查的 AE 包括出血、脓肿形成、胆管损伤、肺炎、败血症、与肝脏疾病相关的 AE、肝功能衰竭和麻醉相关的 AE,通过国际疾病分类,第九/第十修订版,代码确定。
AB、SR 和 LT 的初始治疗中位住院时间分别为 1 天、6 天和 7 天(P<.001)。在初始住院期间,AB、SR 和 LT 队列分别有 5.0%、40.8%和 63.4%的患者接受 ICU 级护理(P<.001)。在 30 天和 90 天,AB、SR 和 LT 队列之间在术后出血、脓肿形成、胆管损伤、肺炎、败血症、与肝脏疾病相关的 AE 和麻醉相关的 AE 的发生率存在显著差异(P<.05)。在 90 天,AB、SR 和 LT 后再入院率分别为 18.6%、28.2%和 40.6%(P<.001)。
与 SR 和 LT 相比,AB 在初始 90 天内导致显著较少的医疗保健利用,因为 AB 的住院时间更短、护理强度更低、再入院率更低、AE 更少。