• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文化差异对与机器人面部进行共同注视和互动的影响。

Cultural differences in joint attention and engagement in mutual gaze with a robot face.

机构信息

Social Cognition in Human-Robot Interaction, Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy.

Robotics and Autonomous Systems Department, A*STAR Institute for Infocomm Research, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 19;13(1):11689. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38704-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-38704-7
PMID:37468517
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10356937/
Abstract

Joint attention is a pivotal mechanism underlying human ability to interact with one another. The fundamental nature of joint attention in the context of social cognition has led researchers to develop tasks that address this mechanism and operationalize it in a laboratory setting, in the form of a gaze cueing paradigm. In the present study, we addressed the question of whether engaging in joint attention with a robot face is culture-specific. We adapted a classical gaze-cueing paradigm such that a robot avatar cued participants' gaze subsequent to either engaging participants in eye contact or not. Our critical question of interest was whether the gaze cueing effect (GCE) is stable across different cultures, especially if cognitive resources to exert top-down control are reduced. To achieve the latter, we introduced a mathematical stress task orthogonally to the gaze cueing protocol. Results showed larger GCE in the Singapore sample, relative to the Italian sample, independent of gaze type (eye contact vs. no eye contact) or amount of experienced stress, which translates to available cognitive resources. Moreover, since after each block, participants rated how engaged they felt with the robot avatar during the task, we observed that Italian participants rated as more engaging the avatar during the eye contact blocks, relative to no eye contact while Singaporean participants did not show any difference in engagement relative to the gaze. We discuss the results in terms of cultural differences in robot-induced joint attention, and engagement in eye contact, as well as the dissociation between implicit and explicit measures related to processing of gaze.

摘要

共同注意力是人类相互交流能力的关键机制。共同注意力在社会认知背景下的基本性质促使研究人员开发了一些任务,以解决这一机制,并以注视线索范式的形式在实验室环境中对其进行操作化。在本研究中,我们探讨了与机器人面孔进行共同注意力是否具有文化特异性的问题。我们改编了一个经典的注视线索范式,即机器人化身在与参与者进行眼神接触或不进行眼神接触之后引导参与者的目光。我们感兴趣的关键问题是,注视线索效应(GCE)是否在不同文化中稳定存在,特别是如果施加自上而下控制的认知资源减少的话。为了实现后者,我们在注视线索协议中引入了一个数学压力任务。结果表明,新加坡样本的 GCE 大于意大利样本,与注视类型(眼神接触与无眼神接触)或经历的压力量无关,这意味着可用的认知资源。此外,由于在每个块之后,参与者都会对他们在任务期间与机器人化身的参与程度进行评分,我们观察到意大利参与者在眼神接触块中对化身的评价更高,而在无眼神接触时则相对较低,而新加坡参与者相对于注视,在参与度方面没有表现出任何差异。我们根据机器人诱导的共同注意力和眼神接触方面的文化差异,以及与注视处理相关的内隐和外显测量之间的分离来讨论结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ec/10356937/f453dfbeda00/41598_2023_38704_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ec/10356937/073f0357ac5b/41598_2023_38704_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ec/10356937/3b3fd89c0164/41598_2023_38704_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ec/10356937/0fe8f3b60a67/41598_2023_38704_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ec/10356937/f453dfbeda00/41598_2023_38704_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ec/10356937/073f0357ac5b/41598_2023_38704_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ec/10356937/3b3fd89c0164/41598_2023_38704_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ec/10356937/0fe8f3b60a67/41598_2023_38704_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31ec/10356937/f453dfbeda00/41598_2023_38704_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cultural differences in joint attention and engagement in mutual gaze with a robot face.文化差异对与机器人面部进行共同注视和互动的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 19;13(1):11689. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38704-7.
2
Eye contact during joint attention with a humanoid robot modulates oscillatory brain activity.与类人机器人进行共同关注时的眼神交流调节脑振荡活动。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Mar 24;16(4):383-392. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab001.
3
On the role of eye contact in gaze cueing.论眼神交流在目光提示中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 14;8(1):17842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36136-2.
4
Re-encountering individuals who previously engaged in joint gaze modulates subsequent gaze cueing.再次遇到之前有过共同注视行为的个体,会调节随后的注视提示。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Feb;42(2):271-84. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000159. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
5
Robot Faces that Follow Gaze Facilitate Attentional Engagement and Increase Their Likeability.跟随目光的机器人面孔有助于吸引注意力并增加其受欢迎程度。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 5;9:70. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00070. eCollection 2018.
6
Effect of race on Gaze Cueing in adults with high and low autistic traits.种族对高、低自闭症特质成年人注视线索的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Sep 15;11(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01307-y.
7
Role of Gaze Cues in Interpersonal Motor Coordination: Towards Higher Affiliation in Human-Robot Interaction.注视线索在人际运动协调中的作用:迈向人机交互中更高程度的情感联系
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 9;11(6):e0156874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156874. eCollection 2016.
8
Gaze-cueing requires intact face processing - Insights from acquired prosopagnosia.注视提示需要完整的面部处理——来自后天面孔失认症的见解。
Brain Cogn. 2017 Apr;113:125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
9
Guilt-inducing interaction with others modulates subsequent attentional orienting via their gaze.与他人产生内疚的相互作用会通过他们的目光调节随后的注意力定向。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 1;13(1):5348. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32283-3.
10
Enhancing the Sense of Attention from an Assistance Mobile Robot by Improving Eye-Gaze Contact from Its Iconic Face Displayed on a Flat Screen.通过改善平面屏幕上标志性面孔的眼神接触来增强辅助移动机器人的注意力感知。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 4;22(11):4282. doi: 10.3390/s22114282.

引用本文的文献

1
Tools and methods to study and replicate experiments addressing human social cognition in interactive scenarios.用于研究和复制解决人类在互动场景中的社会认知的实验的工具和方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7543-7560. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02434-z. Epub 2024 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Different models of anthropomorphism across cultures and ontological limits in current frameworks the integrative framework of anthropomorphism.跨文化的不同拟人化模型以及当前框架(拟人化的综合框架)中的本体论界限。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Aug 25;9:863319. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.863319. eCollection 2022.
2
Visual attentional orienting by eye gaze: A meta-analytic review of the gaze-cueing effect.眼动注视引导的视觉注意定向:注视提示效应的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2021 Dec;147(12):1269-1289. doi: 10.1037/bul0000353.
3
Cross-cultural asymmetries in oculomotor interference elicited by gaze distractors belonging to Asian and White faces.
跨文化的眼球运动干扰不对称性,由属于亚洲人和白种人面孔的注视干扰者引起。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99954-x.
4
To follow or not to follow your gaze: The interplay between strategic control and the eye contact effect on gaze-induced attention orienting.跟随还是不跟随你的目光:策略控制与眼神接触对视定向效应的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jan;151(1):121-136. doi: 10.1037/xge0001074. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
5
Eye contact during joint attention with a humanoid robot modulates oscillatory brain activity.与类人机器人进行共同关注时的眼神交流调节脑振荡活动。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Mar 24;16(4):383-392. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab001.
6
Social robots for education: A review.社交机器人在教育中的应用:综述。
Sci Robot. 2018 Aug 15;3(21). doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954.
7
Pre-exposure to Ambiguous Faces Modulates Top-Down Control of Attentional Orienting to Counterpredictive Gaze Cues.预先暴露于模糊面孔会调节自上而下对注意力定向的控制,以应对反预测性注视线索。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 9;11:2234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02234. eCollection 2020.
8
Social attention across borders: A cross-cultural investigation of gaze cueing elicited by same- and other-ethnicity faces.跨文化的社会注视:相同和不同种族面孔引发的目光提示的跨文化研究。
Br J Psychol. 2021 Aug;112(3):741-762. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
9
The CARESSES study protocol: testing and evaluating culturally competent socially assistive robots among older adults residing in long term care homes through a controlled experimental trial.关爱研究方案:通过对照试验,在长期护理机构的老年人中测试和评估具有文化能力的社交辅助机器人。
Arch Public Health. 2020 Mar 20;78:26. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00409-y. eCollection 2020.
10
Culture modulates face scanning during dyadic social interactions.文化调节了在两人社交互动中的面部扫描。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 6;10(1):1958. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58802-0.