• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

九国防疫政策对 COVID-19 大流行的流行病学表现影响的对比分析。

A comparative analysis of the effects of containment policies on the epidemiological manifestation of the COVID-19 pandemic across nine European countries.

机构信息

Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 19;13(1):11631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37751-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-37751-4
PMID:37468698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10356910/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a catastrophic event that has seriously endangered the world's population. Governments have largely been unprepared to deal with such an unprecedented calamity, partially due to the lack of sufficient or adequately fine-grained data necessary for forecasting the pandemic's evolution. To fill this gap, researchers worldwide have been collecting data about different aspects of COVID-19's evolution and government responses to them so as to provide the foundation for informative models and tools that can be used to mitigate the current pandemic and possibly prevent future ones. Indeed, since the early stages of the pandemic, a number of research initiatives were launched with this goal, including the PERISCOPE (Pan-European Response to the ImpactS of COVID-19 and future Pandemics and Epidemics) Project, funded by the European Commission. PERISCOPE aims to investigate the broad socio-economic and behavioral impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the goal of making Europe more resilient and prepared for future large-scale risks. The purpose of this study, carried out as part of the PERISCOPE project, is to provide a first European-level analysis of the effect of government policies on the spread of the virus. To do so, we assessed the relationship between a novel index, the Policy Intensity Index, and four epidemiological variables collected by the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, and then applied a comprehensive Pan-European population model based on Multilevel Vector Autoregression. This model aims at identifying effects that are common to some European countries while treating country-specific policies as covariates, explaining the different evolution of the pandemic in nine selected countries due to data availability: Spain, France, Netherlands, Latvia, Slovenia, Greece, Ireland, Cyprus, Estonia. Results show that specific policies' effectiveness tend to vary consistently within the different countries, although in general policies related to Health Monitoring and Health Resources are the most effective for all countries.

摘要

COVID-19 大流行是一场灾难性事件,严重威胁着世界人口。各国政府在很大程度上对这种前所未有的灾难准备不足,部分原因是缺乏预测大流行演变所需的足够或足够精细的数据。为了填补这一空白,世界各地的研究人员一直在收集有关 COVID-19 演变及其政府应对措施的不同方面的数据,以为提供信息丰富的模型和工具奠定基础,从而减轻当前大流行并可能预防未来的大流行。事实上,自大流行早期以来,许多研究倡议就以这一目标启动,包括欧洲委员会资助的 PERISCOPE(泛欧应对 COVID-19 及其未来大流行和流行病的影响)项目。PERISCOPE 的目标是研究 COVID-19 大流行的广泛社会经济和行为影响,以使欧洲更具弹性并为未来的大规模风险做好准备。作为 PERISCOPE 项目的一部分进行的这项研究旨在提供对政府政策对病毒传播影响的首次欧洲层面分析。为此,我们评估了新的政策强度指数与欧洲疾病预防控制中心收集的四个流行病学变量之间的关系,然后应用了基于多层次向量自回归的综合泛欧人口模型。该模型旨在确定一些欧洲国家共有的影响,同时将国家特定政策作为协变量进行处理,解释由于数据可用性,九个选定国家中大流行的不同演变:西班牙、法国、荷兰、拉脱维亚、斯洛文尼亚、希腊、爱尔兰、塞浦路斯、爱沙尼亚。结果表明,尽管与卫生监测和卫生资源相关的政策对所有国家最有效,但特定政策的有效性往往在不同国家内一致变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/10356910/7b109340758f/41598_2023_37751_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/10356910/5be08e3905c2/41598_2023_37751_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/10356910/0d4fa1d6a61a/41598_2023_37751_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/10356910/7b109340758f/41598_2023_37751_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/10356910/5be08e3905c2/41598_2023_37751_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/10356910/0d4fa1d6a61a/41598_2023_37751_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2493/10356910/7b109340758f/41598_2023_37751_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative analysis of the effects of containment policies on the epidemiological manifestation of the COVID-19 pandemic across nine European countries.九国防疫政策对 COVID-19 大流行的流行病学表现影响的对比分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 19;13(1):11631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37751-4.
2
Assessing the impact of local context and priorities regarding domestic disease outbreaks and imported risk on early pandemic response: Cross-continental comparisons.评估国内疾病爆发和输入性风险相关的地方背景和优先事项对大流行早期应对的影响:跨大陆比较。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 23;11:1147768. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1147768. eCollection 2023.
3
A cross-country comparison of Covid-19 containment measures and their effects on the epidemic curves.跨国比较新冠病毒防控措施及其对疫情曲线的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 17;22(1):1765. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14088-7.
4
A New Interactive Tool to Visualize and Analyze COVID-19 Data: The PERISCOPE Atlas.一种用于可视化和分析 COVID-19 数据的新型交互式工具:PERISCOPE 图谱。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9136. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159136.
5
Perspective: Lessons from COVID-19 of countries in the European region in light of findings from the health system response monitor.观点:从卫生系统应对监测中获得的结果,来看欧洲区域各国在 COVID-19 方面的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;10:1058729. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1058729. eCollection 2022.
6
Divergent COVID-19 vaccine policies: Policy mapping of ten European countries.差异化的 COVID-19 疫苗政策:十个欧洲国家的政策图谱。
Vaccine. 2023 Apr 24;41(17):2804-2810. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.036. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
7
Changes in the incidence of invasive disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis during the COVID-19 pandemic in 26 countries and territories in the Invasive Respiratory Infection Surveillance Initiative: a prospective analysis of surveillance data.在 26 个国家和地区的侵袭性呼吸道感染监测倡议中,COVID-19 大流行期间肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌和脑膜炎奈瑟菌引起的侵袭性疾病发病率的变化:监测数据的前瞻性分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Jun;3(6):e360-e370. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00077-7.
8
The need for holistic, longitudinal and comparable, real-time assessment of the emotional, behavioral and societal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across nations.需要对新冠疫情在各国造成的情感、行为和社会影响进行全面、纵向、可比的实时评估。
Psychiatriki. 2021 Apr 19;32(1):15-18. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.010. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
Primary care indicators for disease burden, monitoring and surveillance of COVID-19 in 31 European countries: Eurodata Study.31 个欧洲国家用于 COVID-19 疾病负担监测和监测的初级保健指标:Eurodata 研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Apr 3;34(2):402-410. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad224.
10
Dynamic stability of the financial monitoring system: Intellectual analysis.金融监测系统的动态稳定性:智能分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0276533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276533. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative analysis of the role of containment policies, vaccination strategies and virus variants in the COVID-19 pandemic across nine European countries.九个欧洲国家在新冠疫情中遏制政策、疫苗接种策略及病毒变体作用的比较分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 8;15(1):29109. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10132-9.

本文引用的文献

1
A New Interactive Tool to Visualize and Analyze COVID-19 Data: The PERISCOPE Atlas.一种用于可视化和分析 COVID-19 数据的新型交互式工具:PERISCOPE 图谱。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9136. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159136.
2
Modeling vaccination rollouts, SARS-CoV-2 variants and the requirement for non-pharmaceutical interventions in Italy.意大利疫苗接种推广、新冠病毒变异株及非药物干预措施需求的建模
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):993-998. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01334-5. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
3
Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19: A cross-country analysis.
非药物干预措施对 COVID-19 的影响:跨国分析。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jul;36(4):1178-1188. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3164. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
4
The effect of interventions on COVID-19.干预措施对新型冠状病毒肺炎的影响。
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7839):E26-E28. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-3025-y. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
5
Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19.推断政府干预 COVID-19 的效果。
Science. 2021 Feb 19;371(6531). doi: 10.1126/science.abd9338. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
6
Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions.对全球 COVID-19 政府干预措施的效果进行排名。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1303-1312. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
7
Linear mixed models with endogenous covariates: modeling sequential treatment effects with application to a mobile health study.具有内生协变量的线性混合模型:对序贯治疗效果建模及其在移动健康研究中的应用
Stat Sci. 2020;35(3):375-390. doi: 10.1214/19-sts720. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
8
COVID-19 Government Response Event Dataset (CoronaNet v.1.0).COVID-19 政府应对事件数据集(CoronaNet v.1.0)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jul;4(7):756-768. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0909-7. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
9
Adoption and impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19.新冠疫情非药物干预措施的采用情况及影响
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Apr 2;5:59. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15808.1. eCollection 2020.
10
Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe.估算非药物干预措施对欧洲 COVID-19 疫情的影响。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):257-261. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7. Epub 2020 Jun 8.