• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对全球 COVID-19 政府干预措施的效果进行排名。

Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions.

机构信息

Medical University of Vienna, Section for Science of Complex Systems, CeMSIIS, Vienna, Austria.

Complexity Science Hub Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1303-1312. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0
PMID:33199859
Abstract

Assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to mitigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 is critical to inform future preparedness response plans. Here we quantify the impact of 6,068 hierarchically coded NPIs implemented in 79 territories on the effective reproduction number, R, of COVID-19. We propose a modelling approach that combines four computational techniques merging statistical, inference and artificial intelligence tools. We validate our findings with two external datasets recording 42,151 additional NPIs from 226 countries. Our results indicate that a suitable combination of NPIs is necessary to curb the spread of the virus. Less disruptive and costly NPIs can be as effective as more intrusive, drastic, ones (for example, a national lockdown). Using country-specific 'what-if' scenarios, we assess how the effectiveness of NPIs depends on the local context such as timing of their adoption, opening the way for forecasting the effectiveness of future interventions.

摘要

评估非药物干预(NPIs)措施在减轻 SARS-CoV-2 传播方面的效果对于制定未来的防范应对计划至关重要。在这里,我们量化了在 79 个地区实施的 6068 项分层编码的 NPIs 对 COVID-19 的有效繁殖数 R 的影响。我们提出了一种结合了四种计算技术的建模方法,这些技术融合了统计、推理和人工智能工具。我们使用记录了来自 226 个国家的 42151 项额外 NPIs 的两个外部数据集验证了我们的发现。我们的研究结果表明,适当组合 NPIs 是遏制病毒传播的必要条件。破坏性和成本较低的 NPIs 可以与更具侵入性和剧烈性的 NPIs 一样有效(例如,全国封锁)。通过使用特定于国家的“假设情景”,我们评估了 NPIs 的效果如何取决于当地情况,例如它们的采用时间,为预测未来干预措施的效果开辟了道路。

相似文献

1
Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions.对全球 COVID-19 政府干预措施的效果进行排名。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1303-1312. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
2
The temporal association of introducing and lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions with the time-varying reproduction number (R) of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study across 131 countries.引入和取消非药物干预措施与 SARS-CoV-2 时变繁殖数(R)之间的时间关联:131 个国家的建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30785-4. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
3
Evaluating the impacts of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in Canada based on mobile network.基于移动网络评估加拿大非药物干预措施对 COVID-19 传播动力学的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 29;16(12):e0261424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261424. eCollection 2021.
4
The Effects of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 Mortality: A Generalized Synthetic Control Approach Across 169 Countries.非药物干预措施对新冠病毒疾病死亡率的影响:一项涵盖169个国家的广义合成对照法研究
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 4;10:820642. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.820642. eCollection 2022.
5
Assessing the effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission in Spain, 30 August 2020 to 31 January 2021.评估西班牙 2020 年 8 月 30 日至 2021 年 1 月 31 日期间非药物干预措施对 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Euro Surveill. 2022 May;27(19). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.19.2100869.
6
AI-assisted tracking of worldwide non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19.AI 辅助追踪全球针对 COVID-19 的非药物干预措施。
Sci Data. 2021 Mar 25;8(1):94. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00878-y.
7
COVID-19 case doubling time associated with non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination: A global experience.COVID-19 病例倍增时间与非药物干预和疫苗接种的关系:全球经验。
J Glob Health. 2021 Sep 4;11:05021. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.05021. eCollection 2021.
8
Joint Analysis of the Epidemic Evolution and Human Mobility During the First Wave of COVID-19 in Spain: Retrospective Study.联合分析西班牙 COVID-19 第一波疫情演变和人类流动情况:回顾性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 May 22;9:e40514. doi: 10.2196/40514.
9
Estimating and explaining cross-country variation in the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19.估算并解释 COVID-19 期间非药物干预措施在各国之间效果的差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 9;12(1):7526. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11362-x.
10
COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical intervention portfolio effectiveness and risk communication predominance.新冠疫情非药物干预措施组合的有效性及风险沟通的主导作用
Sci Rep. 2021 May 19;11(1):10605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88309-1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Primer on Inference and Prediction With Epidemic Renewal Models and Sequential Monte Carlo.《流行病更新模型与序贯蒙特卡罗的推断与预测入门》
Stat Med. 2025 Aug;44(18-19):e70204. doi: 10.1002/sim.70204.
2
Decreases in chimpanzee respiratory disease signs and enteric viral quantity following implementation of anthroponotic disease prevention protocols at a long-term research site.在一个长期研究地点实施人畜共患病预防方案后,黑猩猩呼吸道疾病症状和肠道病毒数量减少。
Biol Conserv. 2025 Aug;308. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111225. Epub 2025 May 16.
3
Chicago Public Health Department Social Media Communications on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Mpox Epidemic: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis.
芝加哥公共卫生部在新冠疫情和猴痘疫情期间于推特上发布的社交媒体通信:横断面内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 18;27:e68200. doi: 10.2196/68200.
4
Evolving fitness and immune escape: a retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (2020-2024) using protein language model.不断演变的适应性与免疫逃逸:使用蛋白质语言模型对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2刺突蛋白(2020 - 2024年)的回顾性分析
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1576414. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1576414. eCollection 2025.
5
Global, regional, and national characteristics of the main causes of increased disease burden due to the covid-19 pandemic: time-series modelling analysis of global burden of disease study 2021.2019冠状病毒病大流行导致疾病负担增加的主要原因的全球、区域和国家特征:2021年全球疾病负担研究的时间序列建模分析
BMJ. 2025 Jul 2;390:e083868. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083868.
6
Impact of imported COVID-19 cases on South Korea's response: variant transitions and regional patterns (2020-2023).输入性新冠病例对韩国应对措施的影响:变异株演变与区域模式(2020 - 2023年)
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11260-3.
7
Spatial mobility patterns and COVID-19 incidence: A regional analysis of the second wave in the Netherlands.空间流动模式与新冠疫情发病率:荷兰第二波疫情的区域分析
Reg Sci Policy Prac. 2022 Aug 30. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12575.
8
Receptivity of Governmental Communication and Its Effectiveness During COVID-19 Pandemic Emergency in Vietnam: A Qualitative Study.越南新冠疫情紧急状态期间政府沟通的接受度及其有效性:一项定性研究
Glob J Flex Syst Manag. 2021;22(Suppl 1):45-64. doi: 10.1007/s40171-021-00269-7. Epub 2021 May 10.
9
Quantitatively analyzing the relationship between non-pharmaceutical interventions and the direction of virus evolution using a dynamic model.使用动态模型定量分析非药物干预措施与病毒进化方向之间的关系。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 9;13:1542759. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1542759. eCollection 2025.
10
Effect of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions in Preventing COVID-19 on the Circulation of Avian Influenza Virus in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.非药物干预措施预防新型冠状病毒肺炎对中国湖北省武汉市禽流感病毒传播的影响
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 May 25;2024:5528986. doi: 10.1155/2024/5528986. eCollection 2024.