• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

翻转课堂与基于团队的学习教学方法对增强心理授权效果的比较

Comparison of the Effect of Teaching Methods of Flipped Class and TBL in Enhancing Psychological Empowerment.

作者信息

Norouzi Azam, Zabihi Zazoly Atefeh, Sohrabi Zohreh, Ramezani Ghobad, Pourbairamian Ghadir, Hasan Keshavarzi Mohammad, Alizadeh Somayeh

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Center for Educational Research in Medical Science (CERMS), Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2023 Jul;11(3):172-178. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.95631.1652.

DOI:10.30476/JAMP.2023.95631.1652
PMID:37469379
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10352671/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Today, it is felt as necessary to promote the psychological empowerment of individuals, especially at the postgraduate level using an appropriate educational approach. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of flipped class (FC) and team-based learning (TBL) in enhancing psychological empowerment.

METHODS

This semi-experimental study (pretest-posttest model) was conducted on postgraduate students in the Faculty of Medicine. Ninety students were included in the study using census method. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, forty students were divided into two groups of 20 in a non-random way according to their gender and educational level. The workshop teacher randomly selected one of the groups as a TBL and the other as an FC. A two-day workshop was held for each group (12 hours of training in total). The educational method was TBL in one group and FC in another. Spritzer's Psychological Empowerment questionnaire was used for data collection in pre- and post-test (one month apart). This questionnaire includes 12 questions (based on a five-point Likert scale) to assess the 4 aspects of job meaningfulness, feeling to be qualified, feeling to be effective, and feeling to have the freedom of choice. The minimum and maximum scores are 12 and 60, respectively. The experts of the field have confirmed its reliability. Its Cronbach-Alpha values were reported in previous studies at 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. Data were analyzed using statistical tests in SPSS16 and Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests.

RESULTS

The Mann-Whitney U-test indicated no significant difference between the total mean of the two groups (FC: 35.20±1.73, TBL: 34.30±1.26) in the pre-test (P=0.157). However, there was a significant difference between the psychological empowerment scores of the two groups in the post-test (P<0.001). The Wilcoxon test showed a significant difference between pre-test and post-test scores for each group (P<0.05) and the psychological empowerment scores increased in the post-test for the two groups. However, the mean of post-test score in the TBL group (M: 42.55±1.82, P<0.001) was higher than the FC group (M: 38.45±2.64, P>0.001).

CONCLUSION

Due to the influence of the TBL technique on psychological empowerment at the postgraduate level, it seems that TBL is more useful and practical for enhancing psychological empowerment.

摘要

引言

如今,人们认为有必要促进个人的心理赋能,尤其是在研究生阶段采用适当的教育方法。因此,本研究的目的是调查翻转课堂(FC)和基于团队的学习(TBL)在增强心理赋能方面的效果。

方法

本半实验研究(前测-后测模型)在医学院研究生中进行。采用普查法纳入90名学生。在应用纳入和排除标准后,40名学生根据性别和教育水平非随机地分为两组,每组20人。工作坊教师随机选择其中一组作为TBL组,另一组作为FC组。为每组举办了为期两天的工作坊(总共12小时的培训)。一组采用TBL教育方法,另一组采用FC教育方法。在前后测(间隔一个月)时使用施普雷策尔心理赋能问卷进行数据收集。该问卷包括12个问题(基于五点李克特量表),用于评估工作意义、胜任感、效能感和选择自由这四个方面。最低分和最高分分别为12分和60分。该领域的专家已证实其可靠性。在先前的研究中,其克朗巴哈系数值分别报告为0.86和0.89。使用SPSS16中的统计检验以及威尔科克森和曼-惠特尼非参数检验对数据进行分析。

结果

曼-惠特尼U检验表明,两组在预测试中的总均值(FC组:35.20±1.73,TBL组:34.30±1.26)无显著差异(P=0.157)。然而,两组在后测试中的心理赋能得分存在显著差异(P<0.001)。威尔科克森检验表明,每组的前测和后测得分之间存在显著差异(P<0.05),且两组在后测试中的心理赋能得分均有所增加。然而,TBL组的后测试平均分(M:42.55±1.82,P<0.001)高于FC组(M:38.45±2.64,P>0.001)。

结论

由于TBL技术对研究生心理赋能的影响,似乎TBL在增强心理赋能方面更有用且实用。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Effect of Teaching Methods of Flipped Class and TBL in Enhancing Psychological Empowerment.翻转课堂与基于团队的学习教学方法对增强心理授权效果的比较
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2023 Jul;11(3):172-178. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.95631.1652.
2
Online flipped classroom with team-based learning promoted learning activity in a clinical laboratory immunology class: response to the COVID-19 pandemic.在线翻转课堂结合小组学习促进临床免疫学实验室课程的学习活动:应对 COVID-19 大流行。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Dec 3;22(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03917-3.
3
Comparing peer education with TBL workshop in (EBM) teaching.在循证医学教学中比较同伴教育与基于团队的学习工作坊。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Jun 29;34:70. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.70. eCollection 2020.
4
Comparing the Results of Written Testing for Advanced Cardiac Life Support Teaching Using Team-based Learning and the "Flipped Classroom" Strategy.比较基于团队学习和“翻转课堂”策略进行高级心脏生命支持教学的书面测试结果。
Cureus. 2018 May 3;10(5):e2574. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2574.
5
Comparison of team-based learning vs. lecture-based teaching with small group discussion in a master's degree in nursing education course.团队学习与基于讲座的教学与小组讨论在护理教育硕士课程中的比较。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Oct;105:105043. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105043. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
6
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.在诊断影像学质量控制中,基于团队学习的学生学习和教师教学效果评价。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1732159. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1732159.
7
Flipping the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Classroom with Team-based Learning: Comparison of Cognitive Testing Performance for Medical Students at the University of California, Irvine, United States.通过基于团队的学习翻转高级心脏生命支持课堂:美国加利福尼亚大学欧文分校医学生认知测试表现的比较
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 Feb 18;13:11. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.11. eCollection 2016.
8
Incorporating modified team-based learning into a flipped basic medical laboratory course: impact on student performance and perceptions.将改良的团队学习模式融入翻转的基础医学实验室课程:对学生表现和认知的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 6;22(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03676-1.
9
The effectiveness of online team-based learning in introduction to medical ethics education for medical students at a medical college of Nepal: a pilot study.尼泊尔某医学院医学生医学伦理学导论在线团队学习的效果:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03813-w.
10
Team Based Learning (TBL) in undergraduate medical education.本科医学教育中的团队式学习(TBL)。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Aug;24(8):553-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of flipped classroom method on the reflection ability in nursing students in the professional ethics course; Solomon four-group design.翻转课堂教学法对护理专业学生职业道德课程反思能力的影响;所罗门四组设计。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 13;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06556-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between flipped classroom and team-based learning in fixed prosthodontic education.固定义齿修复学教育中翻转课堂与基于团队的学习的比较。
J Prosthodont Res. 2017 Apr;61(2):217-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 14.
2
A novel integration of online and flipped classroom instructional models in public health higher education.公共卫生高等教育中在线教学模式与翻转课堂教学模式的一种新型整合。
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Aug 29;14:181. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-181.
3
Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65.团队学习:实用指南:AMEE 指南第 65 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e275-87. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179. Epub 2012 Apr 4.