• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尼泊尔某医学院医学生医学伦理学导论在线团队学习的效果:一项试点研究。

The effectiveness of online team-based learning in introduction to medical ethics education for medical students at a medical college of Nepal: a pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Forensic Medicine, Gandaki Medical College Teaching Hospital and Research Center, Gandaki Province, Pokhara, Nepal.

Department of Pharmacology, Gandaki Medical College Teaching Hospital and Research Center, Gandaki Province, Pokhara, Nepal.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03813-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-022-03813-w
PMID:36348392
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9643934/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of online classes is always a concern, and it can be overcome by opting for active learning strategies like team-based learning (TBL). This study was conducted to find out the effectiveness of online TBL as an active learning strategy. We also aimed to explore the satisfaction and perception of students toward TBL.

METHODS

This is a mixed-method study conducted among 29 third-year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students of Gandaki Medical College using purposive sampling method in the duration of January to September 2021. Three two hours online TBL sessions were used for teaching introduction to medical ethics. The individual readiness assurance test (IRAT) scores were compared to the group readiness assurance test (GRAT) scores to evaluate the effect of TBL through cooperative learning. Learner reactions and satisfaction of students towards TBL were assessed using a validated questionnaire comprising of a five-point Likert scale. An open-ended question asking the participants to describe their overall experience of the TBL sessions was also included to explore their perceptions towards TBL. The data were collected using Google form and exported to Microsoft Excel and the quantitative data were then analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. To check the normal distribution of the data, Kolmogorov Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk test were used. Non-parametric tests were used for the non-normally distributed data. P value of < 0.05 was regarded as significant. Thematic analysis was conducted for the qualitative data.

RESULTS

The median GRAT scores were significantly higher (p = 0.006 in TBL 1 and 0.001 in TBL 2) than IRAT scores. Learner reactions toward TBL sessions were positive as shown by the mean scores which were in the range of 3.59 to 4.66. Five themes were generated from the codes: "effective learning method", "positive experience", "gained knowledge", "expression of gratitude" and "the way of conduction of the sessions".

CONCLUSION

Online TBL in medical ethics was effective as a teaching learning tool in our setting. The students were satisfied with the learning process and rated the learning strategy positively.

摘要

背景

在线课程的效果一直是人们关注的问题,可以通过选择基于团队的学习(TBL)等主动学习策略来克服。本研究旨在探讨在线 TBL 作为一种主动学习策略的效果。我们还旨在探索学生对 TBL 的满意度和看法。

方法

这是一项混合方法研究,在 2021 年 1 月至 9 月期间,使用目的抽样法在加德满都医学院对 29 名三年级医学学士和外科学士(MBBS)学生进行了研究。使用三个两小时的在线 TBL 课程来教授医学伦理学概论。通过合作学习,比较个体准备保证测试(IRAT)得分和小组准备保证测试(GRAT)得分,以评估 TBL 的效果。使用包含五点李克特量表的经过验证的问卷评估学生对 TBL 的学习反应和满意度。还包括一个开放式问题,要求参与者描述他们对 TBL 课程的整体体验,以探讨他们对 TBL 的看法。使用 Google 表格收集数据,并将其导出到 Microsoft Excel 中,然后使用统计软件包 16.0 分析定量数据。为了检查数据的正态分布,使用了 Kolmogorov Smirnov 和 Shapiro-Wilk 检验。对非正态分布数据使用非参数检验。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。对定性数据进行了主题分析。

结果

TBL1 的中位 GRAT 得分明显高于 IRAT 得分(p=0.006),TBL2 的中位 GRAT 得分明显高于 IRAT 得分(p=0.001)。TBL 课程的学习反应呈阳性,平均得分在 3.59 到 4.66 之间。从代码中生成了五个主题:“有效的学习方法”、“积极的体验”、“获得的知识”、“表达感激”和“课程的进行方式”。

结论

在我们的环境中,在线医学伦理 TBL 是一种有效的教学工具。学生对学习过程感到满意,并对学习策略给予了积极评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb01/9644598/c3212ffe1b7e/12909_2022_3813_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb01/9644598/c3212ffe1b7e/12909_2022_3813_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb01/9644598/c3212ffe1b7e/12909_2022_3813_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of online team-based learning in introduction to medical ethics education for medical students at a medical college of Nepal: a pilot study.尼泊尔某医学院医学生医学伦理学导论在线团队学习的效果:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03813-w.
2
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.在诊断影像学质量控制中,基于团队学习的学生学习和教师教学效果评价。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1732159. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1732159.
3
The effect of team-based learning in medical ethics education.团队学习在医学伦理学教育中的作用。
Med Teach. 2009 Nov;31(11):1013-7. doi: 10.3109/01421590802590553.
4
Modified Team-Based Learning in an Ophthalmology Clerkship in China.中国眼科学实习中的改良团队学习法。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154250. eCollection 2016.
5
Implementation of team-based learning in year 1 of a PBL based medical program: a pilot study.在基于问题式学习的医学课程第一年实施基于团队的学习:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 4;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0550-3.
6
The effectiveness of TBL with real patients in neurology education in terms of knowledge retention, in-class engagement, and learner reactions.以知识保留、课堂参与度和学习者反馈衡量,基于真实患者的团队式学习在神经学教育中的有效性。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2017 Mar 1;41(1):38-43. doi: 10.1152/advan.00130.2016.
7
Assessment of first-year medical students' perceptions of teaching and learning through team-based learning sessions.评估医学生通过团队学习课程对教学的看法。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Dec;40(4):536-542. doi: 10.1152/advan.00001.2016.
8
Meeting the challenge of teaching bioethics: a successful residency curricula utilizing Team-Based Learning.迎接生物伦理学教学的挑战:成功利用团队为基础的学习的住院医师课程
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):359-368. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.2013523.
9
Team-based learning replaces problem-based learning at a large medical school.以团队为基础的学习取代了一所大型医学院的以问题为基础的学习。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02362-4.
10
Effectiveness of the team-based learning (TBL) strategy on medical students' performance.基于团队的学习(TBL)策略对医学生表现的有效性。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2017 Dec 16;13(1):70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.09.003. eCollection 2018 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study on the effectiveness of online and in-class team-based learning on student performance and perceptions in virtual simulation experiments.在线与课堂团队学习在虚拟模拟实验中学生表现和认知效果的比较研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 12;24(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05080-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Are Online Synchronous Team-Based-Learning (TBL) pedagogy effective?: Perspectives from a study on medical students in Oman.基于团队的在线同步学习(TBL)教学法是否有效?:来自阿曼医学生研究的观点。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022 Jan;10(1):12-21. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2021.92361.1481.
2
Online and In-class Team-Based Learning in Undergraduate Immunology: a Comparative Analysis.本科免疫学中基于团队的线上与线下学习:一项比较分析
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Sep 17;29(4):1193-1199. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00814-1. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Going virtual and going wide: comparing Team-Based Learning in-class online and across disciplines.
走向虚拟与广泛应用:比较课堂内、在线及跨学科的基于团队的学习
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(2):2311-2329. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10683-0. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
4
Twelve tips for conducting team-based learning session online in synchronous setting.在同步环境下进行在线团队学习课程的十二个小贴士。
Med Teach. 2022 May;44(5):486-493. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1910642. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
5
Fostering Cognitive Presence, Social Presence and Teaching Presence with Integrated Online-Team-Based Learning.通过基于团队的综合在线学习培养认知临场感、社会临场感和教学临场感。
TechTrends. 2021;65(4):473-484. doi: 10.1007/s11528-021-00598-5. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
6
From Trial to Implementation, Bringing Team-Based Learning Online-Duke-NUS Medical School's Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.从试验到实施,将基于团队的学习模式引入线上——新加坡国立大学杜克医学院对新冠疫情的应对举措
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Aug 4;30(4):1649-1654. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01039-3. eCollection 2020 Dec.
7
Stakeholder acceptance of digital team-based learning.利益相关者对数字化团队学习的接受程度。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Jul;46:102833. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102833. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
8
Online team-based learning sessions as interactive methodologies during the pandemic.在疫情期间,基于团队的在线学习课程作为互动方法。
Med Educ. 2020 Jul;54(7):666-667. doi: 10.1111/medu.14198. Epub 2020 May 26.
9
Innovation in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis.应对 COVID-19 大流行危机的创新。
Acad Med. 2020 Aug;95(8):1140-1142. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003402.
10
Active Learning Strategies to Improve Progression from Knowledge to Action.主动学习策略以促进从知识到行动的转化。
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2020 Feb;46(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2019.09.001.