Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Institute of Education, Psychology and Human Development, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Affect Disord. 2023 Oct 15;339:788-798. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.07.061. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
Research suggests that early parenting may contribute to the development of self-harm but this has not been examined longitudinally. In this study, we explored the relationship between early parenting and self-harm in adolescence and considered whether (1) emotion regulation and (2) decision-making in childhood mediate the relationship between early parenting and self-harm.
Using longitudinal data from the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS), we tested mediation models exploring the relationship between early parenting and self-harm in adolescence via emotion regulation and decision-making. Parenting was assessed at age 3 with measures of conflict, closeness and discipline. The trajectories of independence & self-regulation and emotional dysregulation were modelled from ages 3 to 7 years through latent growth curve analysis, with individual predicted slope and intercept values used in the mediation models. Decision-making (deliberation time, total time, delay aversion, quality of decision making, risk adjustment, risk-taking) was assessed using the Cambridge Gambling Task (CGT) at age 11.
In our sample (n = 11,145), we found no evidence of a direct association between early parenting and self-harm in adolescence. However, there were indirect effects of parenting (conflict and closeness) on self-harm via the slope of emotional dysregulation. Furthermore, delay aversion was positively associated with self-harm in adolescence.
It must be acknowledged that we cannot determine causality and that self-report measures of parenting are vulnerable to several biases.
The findings support early identification and interventions for children exhibiting chronic emotional dysregulation and decision-making characterised by a bias for smaller, immediate over larger, delayed rewards.
研究表明,早期育儿方式可能会影响青少年时期的自残行为,但这尚未进行纵向研究。在本研究中,我们探讨了青少年时期早期育儿方式与自残行为之间的关系,并考虑了(1)情绪调节和(2)儿童时期的决策是否在早期育儿方式与自残行为之间起中介作用。
我们使用千禧年队列研究(MCS)的纵向数据,通过情绪调节和决策来检验早期育儿方式与青少年自残行为之间关系的中介模型。育儿方式在儿童 3 岁时通过冲突、亲密和纪律来评估。从 3 岁到 7 岁,通过潜在增长曲线分析来建立独立性和自我调节以及情绪失调的轨迹,使用个体预测斜率和截距值来进行中介模型。决策(深思熟虑时间、总时间、延迟厌恶、决策质量、风险调整、冒险行为)在 11 岁时使用剑桥赌博任务(CGT)进行评估。
在我们的样本(n=11145)中,我们没有发现早期育儿方式与青少年自残行为之间存在直接关联。然而,情绪失调斜率在育儿方式(冲突和亲密)与自残行为之间存在间接影响。此外,延迟厌恶与青少年时期的自残行为呈正相关。
必须承认,我们不能确定因果关系,并且对育儿方式的自我报告测量容易受到多种偏见的影响。
研究结果支持对表现出慢性情绪失调和决策特征为较小、即时奖励而不是较大、延迟奖励的儿童进行早期识别和干预。