Kilic Yildirim Gonca, Dinleyici Meltem, Vandenplas Yvan, Dinleyici Ener Cagri
Faculty of Medicine, Pediatrics Nutrition and Metabolism Unit, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Pediatrics, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Gut Pathog. 2023 Jul 21;15(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13099-023-00563-y.
INTRODUCTION: Gut microbiota manipulation may be a potential therapeutic target to reduce host energy storage. There is limited information about the effects of probiotics/synbiotics on intestinal microbiota composition in children and adolescents with obesity. The objective of this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was to test the effects of a multispecies synbiotic on intestinal microbiota composition in children and adolescents with exogenous obesity. METHOD: Children with exogenous obesity were managed with a standard diet and increased physical activity and were randomly allocated into two groups at a ratio of 1:1; the 1st group received synbiotic supplementation (probiotic mixture including Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lacticaseibacillus. rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium longum, Enterococcus faecium (total 2.5 × 10 CFU/sachet) and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS; 625 mg/sachet) for 12 weeks; the 2nd group received placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Fecal samples were obtained before and at the end of the 12-week intervention to characterize the changes in the gut microbiota composition. Detailed metagenomic and bioinformatics analyses were performed. RESULTS: Before the intervention, there were no significant differences in alpha diversity indicators between the synbiotic and placebo groups. After 12 weeks of intervention, the observed taxonomic units and Chao 1 were lower in the synbiotic group than at baseline (p < 0.001 for both). No difference for alpha diversity indicators was observed in the placebo group between baseline and 12 weeks of intervention. At the phylum level, the intestinal microbiota composition of the study groups was similar at baseline. The major phyla in the synbiotic group were Firmicutes (66.7%) and Bacteroidetes (18.8%). In the synbiotic group, the Bacteroidetes phylum was higher after 12 weeks than at baseline (24.0% vs. 18.8%, p < 0.01). In the synbiotic group, the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was 3.54 at baseline and 2.75 at 12 weeks of intervention (p < 0.05). In the placebo group, the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was 4.70 at baseline and 3.54 at 12 weeks of intervention (p < 0.05). After 12 weeks of intervention, the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was also lower in the synbiotic group than in the placebo group (p < 0.05). In the synbiotic group, compared with the baseline, we observed a statistically significant increase in the genera Prevotella (5.28-14.4%, p < 0.001) and Dialister (9.68-13.4%; p < 0.05). Compared to baseline, we observed a statistically significant increase in the genera Prevotella (6.4-12.4%, p < 0.01) and Oscillospira (4.95% vs. 5.70%, p < 0.001) in the placebo group. In the synbiotic group, at the end of the intervention, an increase in Prevotella, Coprococcus, Lachnospiraceae (at the genus level) and Prevotella copri, Coprococcus eutactus, Ruminococcus spp. at the species level compared to baseline (predominance of Eubacterium dolichum, Lactobacillus ruminis, Clostridium ramosum, Bulleidia moorei) was observed. At the end of the 12th week of the study, when the synbiotic and placebo groups were compared, Bacteroides eggerthi species were dominant in the placebo group, while Collinsella stercoris species were dominant in the synbiotic group. CONCLUSION: This study is the first pediatric obesity study to show that a synbiotic treatment is associated with both changes intestinal microbiota composition and decreases in BMI. Trial identifier: NCT05162209 (www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov).
引言:肠道微生物群调控可能是减少宿主能量储存的一个潜在治疗靶点。关于益生菌/合生元对肥胖儿童和青少年肠道微生物群组成的影响,相关信息有限。这项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验的目的是测试一种多物种合生元对患有外源性肥胖的儿童和青少年肠道微生物群组成的影响。 方法:患有外源性肥胖的儿童采用标准饮食并增加体育活动,按1:1的比例随机分为两组;第一组接受合生元补充剂(益生菌混合物,包括嗜酸乳杆菌、鼠李糖乳杆菌、两歧双歧杆菌、长双歧杆菌、粪肠球菌(共2.5×10 CFU/小袋)和低聚果糖(FOS;625毫克/小袋),持续12周;第二组每天接受一次安慰剂,持续12周。在12周干预前后采集粪便样本,以表征肠道微生物群组成的变化。进行了详细的宏基因组和生物信息学分析。 结果:干预前,合生元组和安慰剂组的α多样性指标无显著差异。干预12周后,合生元组观察到的分类单元和Chao 1均低于基线水平(两者p均<0.001)。安慰剂组在基线和干预12周之间未观察到α多样性指标的差异。在门水平上,研究组的肠道微生物群组成在基线时相似。合生元组的主要门是厚壁菌门(66.7%)和拟杆菌门(18.8%)。在合生元组中,12周后拟杆菌门高于基线水平(24.0%对18.8%,p<0.01)。在合生元组中,厚壁菌门/拟杆菌门的比例在基线时为3.54,干预12周时为2.75(p<0.05)。在安慰剂组中,厚壁菌门/拟杆菌门的比例在基线时为4.70,干预12周时为3.54(p<0.05)。干预12周后,合生元组的厚壁菌门/拟杆菌门比例也低于安慰剂组(p<0.05)。在合生元组中,与基线相比,我们观察到普雷沃氏菌属(从5.28%增加到14.4%,p<0.001)和戴阿利斯特菌属(从9.68%增加到13.4%;p<0.05)有统计学意义的增加。与基线相比,我们在安慰剂组中观察到普雷沃氏菌属(从6.4%增加到12.4%,p<0.01)和颤螺菌属(从4.95%增加到5.70%,p<0.001)有统计学意义的增加。在合生元组中,干预结束时,与基线相比,普雷沃氏菌属、粪球菌属、毛螺菌科(属水平)以及普氏粪杆菌、真粪球菌、瘤胃球菌属(种水平)增加(以多形真杆菌、瘤胃乳杆菌、多枝梭菌、穆氏布勒德菌为主)。在研究的第12周结束时,比较合生元组和安慰剂组,安慰剂组中埃氏拟杆菌占主导,而合生元组中柯林斯氏菌占主导。 结论:本研究是第一项表明合生元治疗与肠道微生物群组成变化和BMI降低相关的儿科肥胖研究。试验标识符:NCT05162209(www.CLINICALTRIALS.gov)
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025-7-2
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025-2-21
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2021-8-8
Front Microbiol. 2021-5-19
Cell. 2021-5-13
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021-9
Front Pediatr. 2021-3-19