• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残气量的生物学和技术变异性及其对体脂计算的影响。

Biological and technological variability of residual lung volume and the effect on body fat calculations.

作者信息

Marks C, Katch V

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986 Aug;18(4):485-8.

PMID:3747810
Abstract

Ten subjects were studied to determine within-subject variance (Swi2), and its components, biovariability (Si2) and technological error (Se2) of residual lung volume (RLV). Each subject's RLV was determined 18 times using the oxygen dilution method (O2D) over a 5-day period. Se2 was measured using a 9.0 l spirometer as a simulated subject and estimating its added space by the O2D method for 20 repeat trials. The mean +/- SD of RLV across subjects was 1.408 +/- 0.3143 l. The average Swi2 for the 18 trials was 0.0054 (Swi = +/- 0.0735 l). The variance associated with a trend effect (variance of mean trial scores, Sc2) was 0.00050 (Sc = +/- 0.0224 l). Se2 was found to be 0.00104 (Se = +/- 0.0323 l). Si2 calculated by subtracting Se2 and Sc2 from Swi2, was 0.0039 (Si = +/- 0.0621 l). It was demonstrated that body fat weight calculations can vary because of the within-subject variability in RLV. The calculated reliability of RLV across subjects was r = 0.95. It is concluded that RLV determined by the O2D method is very reliable. Moreover, biological variance accounts for 72% of Swi2 while technological variance and trend effect variance account for 19 and 9% of Swi2 respectively.

摘要

对10名受试者进行了研究,以确定残气量(RLV)的受试者内方差(Swi2)及其组成部分,即生物变异性(Si2)和技术误差(Se2)。在5天的时间内,使用氧稀释法(O2D)对每位受试者的RLV进行了18次测定。使用一台9.0升的肺量计模拟受试者,并通过O2D方法对其增加的空间进行估计,进行20次重复试验来测量Se2。受试者的RLV均值±标准差为1.408±0.3143升。18次试验的平均Swi2为0.0054(Swi =±0.0735升)。与趋势效应相关的方差(平均试验得分的方差,Sc2)为0.00050(Sc =±0.0224升)。发现Se2为0.00104(Se =±0.0323升)。通过从Swi2中减去Se2和Sc2计算得出的Si2为0.0039(Si =±0.0621升)。结果表明,由于RLV的受试者内变异性,身体脂肪重量的计算可能会有所不同。计算得出的受试者间RLV可靠性为r = 0.95。得出的结论是,通过O2D方法测定的RLV非常可靠。此外,生物方差占Swi2的72%,而技术方差和趋势效应方差分别占Swi2的19%和9%。

相似文献

1
Biological and technological variability of residual lung volume and the effect on body fat calculations.残气量的生物学和技术变异性及其对体脂计算的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986 Aug;18(4):485-8.
2
Accuracy of measured and predicted residual lung volume on body density measurement.基于身体密度测量的实测和预测残气量的准确性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986 Dec;18(6):647-52.
3
Effect of immersion on RV in young women: implications for measurement of body density.浸泡对年轻女性右心室的影响:对身体密度测量的启示。
Int J Sports Med. 1982 Nov;3(4):220-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1026091.
4
Reliability and validity of the lung volume measurement made by the BOD POD body composition system.BOD POD身体成分测量系统所测肺容量的可靠性与有效性
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2007 Jan;27(1):42-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2007.00713.x.
5
Body composition by hydrostatic weighing at total lung capacity and residual volume.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984 Aug;16(4):411-4.
6
Further simplification of a method for determination of residual lung volume.测定残气量方法的进一步简化。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980;12(3):216-8.
7
Comparison of measured and predicted residual lung volume in determining body composition of collegiate wrestlers.
J Strength Cond Res. 2004 May;18(2):281-5. doi: 10.1519/R-13032.1.
8
Accuracy of residual volume prediction--effects on body composition estimation in pulmonary dysfunction.
Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Jun;10(2):88-93.
9
Maximal exercise and residual lung volume: considerations for body composition analysis.
Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1983 Sep;8(3):189-92.
10
The effect of an acute bout of exercise on selected pulmonary function measurements.一次急性运动对选定肺功能测量指标的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1981;13(5):290-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Techniques of measurement of body composition. Part II.身体成分测量技术。第二部分。
Sports Med. 1988 Feb;5(2):74-98. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198805020-00002.