State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, PR China; Environmental Analysis and Testing Laboratory, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, PR China.
Chemosphere. 2023 Oct;339:139537. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139537. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
There have been concerns raised about the environmental effects of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) because of their toxicity, widespread distribution, and persistence. Understanding the occurrences and ecological risk posed by PFASs is essential, especially for the short-chain replacements perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA) and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS), which are now becoming predominant PFASs. The lack of aquatic life criteria (ALC), however, prevents an accurate assessment of the ecological risks of PFBA and PFBS. This study thus investigated the occurrence of 15 PFASs at 29 sampling sites in Shaying River Basin (in China) systematically, conducted the toxicity tests of PFBA and PFBS on eight resident aquatic organisms in China, and derived the predicted non-effect concentration (PNEC) values for PFBA and PFBS for two environmental media in China. The results showed that the total PFASs concentrations (ΣPFASs) ranged from 5.07 to 20.32 ng/L (average of 10.95 ng/L) in surface water, whereas in sediment, ΣPFASs ranged from 6.46 to 20.05 ng/g (dw) (average of 11.51 ng/g). The presence of PFBS was the most prominent PFASs in both water (0.372-8.194 ng/L) and sediment (4.54-15.72 ng/g), demonstrating that short-chain substitution effects can be observed in watersheds. The PNEC values for freshwater and sediment were 6.60 mg/L and 8.30 mg/kg (ww), respectively, for PFBA, and 14.04 mg/L, 37.08 mg/kg (ww), respectively, for PFBS. Ecological risk assessment of two long-chain PFASs, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), and two short-chain PFASs, PFBA and PFBS, using the hazard quotient method revealed that Shaying River and other major River Basins in China were at risk of PFOS contamination. This study contributes to a better understanding of the presence and risk of PFASs in the Shaying River and first proposes the ALCs for PFBA and PFBS in China, which could provide important reference information for water quality standards.
人们一直对全氟烷基物质 (PFASs) 的环境影响表示担忧,因为它们具有毒性、广泛分布和持久性。了解 PFASs 的存在和生态风险至关重要,特别是对于现在占主导地位的短链替代品——全氟丁烷酸 (PFBA) 和全氟丁烷磺酸 (PFBS)。然而,缺乏水生生物标准 (ALC) 使得无法准确评估 PFBA 和 PFBS 的生态风险。因此,本研究系统地调查了沙颖河流域 (中国) 29 个采样点的 15 种 PFASs 的存在情况,对中国 8 种本地水生生物进行了 PFBA 和 PFBS 的毒性测试,并推导了中国两种环境介质中 PFBA 和 PFBS 的预测无效应浓度 (PNEC) 值。结果表明,地表水总 PFASs 浓度 (ΣPFASs) 范围为 5.07-20.32ng/L(平均值为 10.95ng/L),而沉积物中 ΣPFASs 浓度范围为 6.46-20.05ng/g(干重)(平均值为 11.51ng/g)。PFBS 的存在是水中 (0.372-8.194ng/L) 和沉积物 (4.54-15.72ng/g) 中最突出的 PFASs,表明在流域中可以观察到短链替代效应。PFBA 的淡水和沉积物 PNEC 值分别为 6.60mg/L 和 8.30mg/kg(干重),PFBS 的 PNEC 值分别为 14.04mg/L 和 37.08mg/kg(干重)。采用危害商数法对两种长链 PFASs——全氟辛酸 (PFOA) 和全氟辛烷磺酸 (PFOS) 以及两种短链 PFASs——PFBA 和 PFBS 进行生态风险评估,结果表明沙颖河和中国其他主要河流流域存在 PFOS 污染风险。本研究有助于更好地了解沙颖河流域 PFASs 的存在和风险,并首次提出了中国 PFBA 和 PFBS 的 ALC,可为水质标准提供重要参考信息。