Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey, TR55139.
Department of Anesthesiology, Cigli Regional Training Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 21;23(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02206-w.
Cesarean section is becoming increasingly common. Well-managed postoperative analgesia improves patient comfort while encouraging early ambulation and breastfeeding. The analgesic efficacy of transversalis facial plane block (TFPB) vs. anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) was compared in this study.
We analyzed the data of 49 pregnant women (gestation, ≥ 37weeks; age, 18-45years) scheduled for elective cesarean delivery (CD) under general anesthesia. They were randomly divided into TFPB and anterior QLB groups. All blocks were administered bilaterally with 25mL of 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance prior to extubation. Postoperative morphine consumption and numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores (static and dynamic [during coughing]) were recorded at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24h.
There was no difference in postoperative morphine consumption between the groups at the third, sixth, and ninth hours, but the anterior QLB group consumed less morphine at the 12th, 18th, and 24th hours. Except for the first hour, resting and dynamic NRS scores were comparable between the groups. The first-hour resting and dynamic NRS scores were lower in the TFPB group (resting NRS, anterior QLB group, median [interquartile range], 2 [2-3] vs. TFPB group, 2 [0-2], p = 0.046; dynamic NRS, anterior QLB group, median [interquartile range], 3 [2-4] vs. TFPB group 2 [0-3], p = 0.001).
In patients undergoing CD, anterior QLB decreased morphine consumption in the late period (9-24h) compared to TFPB, while pain scores were similar between both groups. The reduction in morphine consumption was statistically significant, but not clinically significant.
剖宫产术越来越普遍。良好管理的术后镇痛可提高患者舒适度,同时鼓励早期活动和母乳喂养。本研究比较了经腹平面阻滞(TFPB)与前锯肌平面阻滞(QLB)的镇痛效果。
我们分析了 49 例行全身麻醉下择期剖宫产(CD)孕妇(孕周≥37 周;年龄 18-45 岁)的数据。他们被随机分为 TFPB 和前 QLB 组。所有阻滞均在拔出气管导管前在超声引导下双侧给予 25mL0.25%布比卡因。记录术后吗啡用量和数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分(静息和动态[咳嗽时])在 1、3、6、9、12、18 和 24 小时。
两组在第 3、6 和 9 小时的术后吗啡用量无差异,但前 QLB 组在第 12、18 和 24 小时的吗啡用量较少。除第 1 小时外,两组静息和动态 NRS 评分相当。TFPB 组第 1 小时静息和动态 NRS 评分较低(静息 NRS,前 QLB 组中位数[四分位数间距]为 2[2-3],TFPB 组为 2[0-2],p=0.046;动态 NRS,前 QLB 组中位数[四分位数间距]为 3[2-4],TFPB 组为 2[0-3],p=0.001)。
在接受 CD 的患者中,与 TFPB 相比,前 QLB 减少了吗啡的晚期(9-24 小时)用量,而两组间疼痛评分相似。吗啡用量减少具有统计学意义,但无临床意义。