Department of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.
Post Graduate Program in Dentistry, Cruzeiro Do Sul University, São Paulo, Brazil.
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 21;23(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03192-8.
Several systemic conditions can result in distinct degrees of salivary gland damage and consequent hypofunction. The development of successful management schemes is highly challenging due to the complexity of saliva. This study aimed to systematically map the literature on the physical stimulation of salivary glands for hyposalivation management and the response of individuals according to different systemic conditions causing salivary impairment.
A systematic search in the literature was performed. Two reviewers independently selected clinical trials, randomized or not, that used physical stimulation to treat hyposalivation caused by systemic conditions. Studies evaluating healthy subjects without hyposalivation were included as controls. Single-arm clinical studies or case series were also included for protocol mapping (PRISMA extension for scoping reviews).
Out of 24 included studies, 10 evaluated healthy subjects, from which 9 tested transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and 1 tested acupuncture and electroacupuncture. Fourteen studies evaluated individuals with hyposalivation: 6 applied TENS, 6 applied low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and 2 applied acupuncture, carried out in post-chemotherapy, medication use, postmenopausal women, hemodialysis patients, smokers, diabetics, Sjögren's syndrome (SS). All showed increased salivation after treatment, except for two LLLT studies in individuals with SS.
Among the different patient groups, individuals with Sjögren's syndrome (SS) exhibited the poorest responses, while those with medication-induced hyposalivation demonstrated the most favorable treatment outcomes, independently of the management strategy for saliva stimulation. It means that physical stimulation of salivary glands holds promise as an alternative for managing hyposalivation in cases of reversible gland damage. However, to make informed decisions in current practice, it is necessary to conduct new well-designed randomized clinical trials with appropriate methodologies.
多种系统性疾病可导致唾液腺不同程度的损伤和随后的功能减退。由于唾液的复杂性,成功制定管理方案极具挑战性。本研究旨在系统性地绘制文献图谱,阐明针对唾液分泌减少症的唾液腺物理刺激管理以及根据导致唾液损伤的不同系统性疾病个体反应。
对文献进行系统检索。两位审稿人独立筛选了使用物理刺激治疗由系统性疾病引起的唾液分泌减少症的临床试验,无论是否为随机对照试验。将无唾液分泌减少症的健康受试者纳入对照组。还纳入了单臂临床研究或病例系列研究以进行方案映射(扩展后的 PRISMA 用于范围综述)。
24 项纳入研究中,有 10 项评估了健康受试者,其中 9 项测试了经皮神经电刺激(TENS),1 项测试了针灸和电针。14 项研究评估了唾液分泌减少症患者:6 项应用 TENS,6 项应用低水平激光治疗(LLLT),2 项应用针灸,这些研究分别在化疗后、用药后、绝经后妇女、血液透析患者、吸烟者、糖尿病患者、干燥综合征(SS)患者中进行。所有研究均显示治疗后唾液分泌增加,但在 SS 患者的两项 LLLT 研究中除外。
在不同的患者群体中,干燥综合征(SS)患者的反应最差,而药物引起的唾液分泌减少症患者的治疗效果最好,无论唾液刺激管理策略如何。这意味着,唾液腺的物理刺激作为治疗可逆性腺体损伤引起的唾液分泌减少症的替代方法具有一定的前景。然而,为了在当前实践中做出明智的决策,有必要开展具有适当方法学的新的精心设计的随机临床试验。