Suppr超能文献

2019年美国各州大麻销售合法化后,通过网络服务和政府维护的州登记处获取的大麻零售商信息的准确性差异。

Accuracy Differences in Cannabis Retailer Information Ascertained from Webservices and Government-Maintained State Registries Across US States Legalizing the Sale of Cannabis in 2019.

作者信息

Williams Michael, Mahlan Matt, Holmes Connor, Pankowska Magdalena, Kaur Manjot, Ilegbusi Aderonke, Haley Danielle F

机构信息

Institute for Health Equity and Social Justice Research and Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University.

Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University.

出版信息

Cannabis. 2023 Jul 5;6(2):133-148. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2023/000148. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Cannabis retailer locations used to investigate geographic cannabis access are frequently ascertained from two sources: 1) webservices which provide locations of cannabis retailers (e.g., Yelp) or 2) government-maintained registries. Characterizing the operating status and location information accuracy of cannabis retailer data sources on a state-by-state level can inform research examining the health implications of cannabis legalization policies. This study ascertained cannabis retailer name and location from webservices and government-maintained registries for 26 states and the District of Columbia legalizing cannabis sales in 2019. Validation subsamples were created using state-level sequential sampling. Phone surveys were conducted by trained researchers for webservice samples (n=790, November 2019 - May 2020) and government-maintained registry (n=859, February - June 2020) to ascertain information about operating status and location. Accuracy was calculated as the percent agreement among subsample and phone survey data. For operating status and location, webservice derived data was 78% (614/790) and 79% (484/611) accurate, whereas government-maintained registry derived data was 76% (657/859) and 95% (622/655) accurate, respectively. Fifty-nine percent (15/27) of states and the District of Columbia had over 80% accuracy for operating status and 48% (13/27) states had over 80% accuracy for location information with both data sources. However, government-maintained registry derived information was more accurate in 33% (9/27) states for operating status and 41% (11/27) states for location information. Both data sources had similar operating status accuracy. Research using spatial analysis may prefer government-maintained registry derived data due to high location information accuracy, whereas studies looking at broad trends across states may prefer webservice derived. State level COVID-19 restrictions had minimal impact on ascertainment of cannabis retailer operating status and location information via phone survey derived from webservices and government-maintained registries.

摘要

用于调查大麻获取地理情况的大麻零售商位置通常从两个来源确定

1)提供大麻零售商位置的网络服务(如Yelp),或2)政府维护的登记册。在州一级描述大麻零售商数据源的运营状态和位置信息准确性,可以为研究大麻合法化政策对健康的影响提供参考。本研究从网络服务和政府维护的登记册中确定了2019年大麻销售合法化的26个州和哥伦比亚特区的大麻零售商名称和位置。使用州级序贯抽样创建验证子样本。由训练有素的研究人员对网络服务样本(n = 790,2019年11月至2020年5月)和政府维护的登记册(n = 859,2020年2月至6月)进行电话调查,以确定有关运营状态和位置的信息。准确性计算为子样本和电话调查数据之间的一致百分比。对于运营状态和位置,网络服务得出的数据准确性分别为78%(614/790)和79%(484/611),而政府维护的登记册得出的数据准确性分别为76%(657/859)和95%(622/655)。59%(15/27)的州和哥伦比亚特区运营状态准确性超过80%,48%(13/27)的州两个数据源的位置信息准确性超过80%。然而,政府维护的登记册得出的信息在33%(9/27)的州运营状态方面更准确,在41%(11/27)的州位置信息方面更准确。两个数据源的运营状态准确性相似。由于位置信息准确性高,使用空间分析的研究可能更喜欢政府维护的登记册得出的数据,而研究各州广泛趋势的研究可能更喜欢网络服务得出的数据。州一级的COVID-19限制对通过网络服务和政府维护的登记册进行电话调查确定大麻零售商运营状态和位置信息的影响最小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26be/10361797/10cd2b918855/rsmj-6-2-133-fig001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验