Böhm Gisela, Pfister Hans-Rüdiger, Doran Rouven, Ogunbode Charles A, Poortinga Wouter, Tvinnereim Endre, Steentjes Katharine, Mays Claire, Bertoldo Raquel, Sonnberger Marco, Pidgeon Nicholas
Department of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Psychology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 6;14:1139133. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1139133. eCollection 2023.
We present a study of emotional reactions to climate change utilizing representative samples from France, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom (UK). Drawing on appraisal theories of emotion, we examine relations between appraisals, emotions, and behavioral intentions in the context of climate change. We compare the four countries concerning emotional differences and commonalities and relate our findings to pertinent models of cultural values. Five distinct emotions were measured: worry, hope, fear, outrage, and guilt. In addition, the survey asked respondents to appraise a set of climate-related statements, such as the causality of climate change, or the efficacy of mitigation efforts. Also, a set of climate-relevant actions, such as willingness to reduce energy consumption or support for climate policies, was assessed. Findings show that appraisals of human causation and moral concern were associated with worry and outrage, and appraisals of efficacy and technological solutions were associated with hope. Worry and outrage are associated with intentions to reduce one's energy consumption, whereas hope and guilt are related to support for policies such as tax and price increases. A country comparison shows that French respondents score high on outrage and worry and tend to engage in individual behaviors to mitigate climate change, whereas Norwegian respondents score high on hope and show a tendency to support policies of cost increase. Generally, worry is the most and guilt the least intense emotion. Moral concerns and perceived collective efficacy of one's country in addressing climate change are relatively strong in France, while beliefs in human causation and in negative impacts of climate change prevail in Germany, and confidence in technological solutions are prevalent in Norway. In sum, findings reveal typical patterns of emotional responses in the four countries and confirm systematic associations between emotions and appraisals as well as between emotions and behaviors. Relating these findings to models of cultural values reveals that Norway, endorsing secular and egalitarian values, is characterized by hope and confidence in technological solutions, whereas France and Germany, emphasizing relatively more hierarchical and traditional values, are rather characterized by fear, outrage, and support for behavioral restrictions imposed by climate change policies.
我们展示了一项利用来自法国、德国、挪威和英国的代表性样本对气候变化的情绪反应进行的研究。借鉴情绪评估理论,我们考察了在气候变化背景下评估、情绪和行为意图之间的关系。我们比较了这四个国家在情绪差异和共性方面的情况,并将我们的研究结果与相关的文化价值观模型联系起来。测量了五种不同的情绪:担忧、希望、恐惧、愤怒和内疚。此外,调查要求受访者对一系列与气候相关的陈述进行评估,例如气候变化的因果关系或缓解措施的有效性。同时,还评估了一系列与气候相关的行动,例如减少能源消耗的意愿或对气候政策的支持。研究结果表明,对人类因果关系和道德关注的评估与担忧和愤怒相关,而对有效性和技术解决方案的评估与希望相关。担忧和愤怒与减少个人能源消耗的意图相关,而希望和内疚与对税收和价格上涨等政策的支持相关。国家间比较显示,法国受访者在愤怒和担忧方面得分较高,倾向于采取个人行为来缓解气候变化,而挪威受访者在希望方面得分较高,表现出支持成本增加政策的倾向。一般来说,担忧是最强烈的情绪,内疚是最不强烈的情绪。法国在道德关注和对本国应对气候变化的集体效能感方面相对较强,而德国在人类因果关系和气候变化负面影响的信念方面占主导,挪威对技术解决方案的信心普遍存在。总之,研究结果揭示了这四个国家情绪反应的典型模式,并证实了情绪与评估之间以及情绪与行为之间的系统关联。将这些结果与文化价值观模型联系起来表明,挪威赞同世俗和平等价值观,其特点是对技术解决方案抱有希望和信心,而法国和德国相对更强调等级制度和传统价值观,其特点是恐惧、愤怒以及对气候变化政策施加的行为限制的支持。