Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Cancer. 2023 Oct 1;129(19):3044-3052. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34836. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining wider adoption for prostate cancer management but there remain significant toxicity risks when delivering prostate SBRT with standard techniques. Magnetic resonance-guided daily adaptive SBRT (MRg-A-SBRT) offers technological advantages in precision of radiation dose delivery, but the toxicity profile associated with MRg-A-SBRT compared to more standardly used fiducial or computed tomography-guided non-adaptive prostate SBRT (CT-SBRT) remains unknown.
A meta-analysis to compare acute toxicity rates associated with MRg-A-SBRT and CT-SBRT for prostate cancer was performed in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE (PubMed) and Google Scholar were searched for prospective studies of prostate SBRT that were published between January 1, 2018 and August 31, 2022. Random effects and fixed effects models were used to estimate pooled toxicity rates, and meta-regression was performed to compare toxicity between MRg-A-SBRT and CT-SBRT study groups.
Twenty-nine prospective studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria and included a total of 2547 patients. The pooled estimates for acute grade 2 or higher (G2+) genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity for MRg-A-SBRT were 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-24%) and 4% (95% CI, 2%-7%) and for CT-SBRT they were 28% (95% CI, 23%-33%) and 9% (95% CI, 6%-12%), respectively. On meta-regression, the odds ratios for acute G2+ GU and GI toxicities comparing MRg-A-SBRT and CT-SBRT were 0.56 (95% CI, 0.33-0.97, p = .04) and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.17-0.96, p = .04), respectively.
MRg-A-SBRT is associated with a significantly reduced risk of acute G2+ GU or GI toxicity compared to CT-SBRT. Longer follow-up will be needed to evaluate late toxicity and disease control outcomes.
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided daily adaptive prostate stereotactic radiation (MRg-A-SBRT) is a treatment that may allow for delivery of prostate radiation more precisely than other radiotherapy techniques, but it is unknown whether this reduces side effects compared to standardly used computed tomography-guided SBRT (CT-SBRT). In this systematic review and meta-analysis combining data from 29 clinical trials including 2547 patients, it was found that the risk of short-term urinary side effects was reduced by 44% and the risk of short-term bowel side effects was reduced by 60% with MRg-A-SBRT compared to CT-SBRT.
立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)在前列腺癌管理中的应用越来越广泛,但采用标准技术进行前列腺 SBRT 仍存在显著的毒性风险。磁共振引导的每日自适应 SBRT(MRg-A-SBRT)在放射剂量传递的精确性方面具有技术优势,但与更常用的基于标记物或计算机断层扫描引导的非自适应前列腺 SBRT(CT-SBRT)相比,MRg-A-SBRT 相关的毒性特征仍不清楚。
按照 PRISMA 指南,对比较前列腺癌 MRg-A-SBRT 和 CT-SBRT 相关急性毒性发生率的荟萃分析进行了检索。在 MEDLINE(PubMed)和 Google Scholar 上检索了 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 31 日期间发表的关于前列腺 SBRT 的前瞻性研究。使用随机效应和固定效应模型估计汇总毒性率,并进行荟萃回归比较 MRg-A-SBRT 和 CT-SBRT 研究组之间的毒性。
确定了 29 项符合纳入标准的前瞻性研究,共纳入 2547 例患者。MRg-A-SBRT 的急性 2 级或更高级别(G2+)泌尿生殖(GU)和胃肠道(GI)毒性的汇总估计值分别为 16%(95%置信区间[CI],10%-24%)和 4%(95% CI,2%-7%),而 CT-SBRT 的相应值分别为 28%(95% CI,23%-33%)和 9%(95% CI,6%-12%)。荟萃回归分析显示,MRg-A-SBRT 与 CT-SBRT 相比,急性 G2+GU 和 GI 毒性的优势比分别为 0.56(95% CI,0.33-0.97,p=0.04)和 0.40(95% CI,0.17-0.96,p=0.04)。
与 CT-SBRT 相比,MRg-A-SBRT 治疗与急性 G2+GU 或 GI 毒性的风险显著降低相关。需要更长时间的随访来评估晚期毒性和疾病控制结果。