Suppr超能文献

紫外线智能 D60 降低软性光纤喉镜污染效果的研究。

The Effectiveness of Ultraviolet Smart D60 in Reducing Contamination of Flexible Fiberoptic Laryngoscopes.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.

Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2023 Dec;133(12):3512-3519. doi: 10.1002/lary.30869. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of disinfection protocols utilizing a ultraviolet (UV) Smart D60 light system with Impelux™ technology with a standard Cidex ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) disinfection protocol for cleaning flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopes (FFLs).

METHODS

Two hundred FFLs were tested for bacterial contamination after routine use, and another 200 FFLs were tested after disinfection with one of four methods: enzymatic detergent plus Cidex OPA (standard), enzymatic detergent plus UV Smart D60, microfiber cloth plus UV Smart D60, and nonsterile wipe plus UV Smart D60. Pre- and post-disinfection microbial burden levels and positive culture rates were compared using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Fisher's two-sided exact, respectively.

RESULTS

After routine use, approximately 56% (112/200) of FFLs were contaminated, with an average contamination level of 9,973.7 ± 70,136.3 CFU/mL. The standard reprocessing method showed no positive cultures. The enzymatic plus UV, microfiber plus UV, and nonsterile wipe plus UV methods yielded contamination rates of 4% (2/50), 6% (3/50), and 12% (6/50), respectively, with no significant differences among the treatment groups (p > 0.05). The pre-disinfection microbial burden levels decreased significantly after each disinfection technique (p < 0.001). The average microbial burden recovered after enzymatic plus UV, microfiber plus UV, and nonsterile wipe plus UV were 0.40 CFU/mL ± 2, 0.60 CFU/mL ± 2.4, and 12.2 CFU/mL ± 69.5, respectively, with no significant difference among the treatment groups (p > 0.05). Micrococcus species (53.8%) were most frequently isolated, and no high-concern organisms were recovered.

CONCLUSION

Disinfection protocols utilizing UV Smart D60 were as effective as the standard chemical disinfection protocol using Cidex OPA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 133:3512-3519, 2023.

摘要

目的

比较利用紫外线(UV)Smart D60 光系统和 Impelux™技术的消毒方案与标准的邻苯二甲醛(OPA)化学消毒方案对清洁软性纤维喉镜(FFL)的效果。

方法

200 根 FFL 在常规使用后进行细菌污染检测,另外 200 根 FFL 分别采用四种方法之一进行消毒:含酶清洁剂加 Cidex OPA(标准)、含酶清洁剂加 UV Smart D60、微纤维布加 UV Smart D60 和非无菌擦拭布加 UV Smart D60。使用 Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA 和 Fisher 双侧精确检验分别比较消毒前后的微生物负担水平和阳性培养率。

结果

常规使用后,约 56%(112/200)的 FFL 受到污染,平均污染水平为 9973.7±70136.3 CFU/mL。标准再处理方法未发现阳性培养。含酶加 UV、微纤维加 UV 和非无菌擦拭布加 UV 方法的污染率分别为 4%(2/50)、6%(3/50)和 12%(6/50),各组间无显著差异(p>0.05)。每次消毒技术后,预消毒微生物负担水平均显著降低(p<0.001)。含酶加 UV、微纤维加 UV 和非无菌擦拭布加 UV 后平均微生物负荷分别为 0.40 CFU/mL±2、0.60 CFU/mL±2.4 和 12.2 CFU/mL±69.5,各组间无显著差异(p>0.05)。最常分离到的微生物为微球菌属(53.8%),未回收高关注生物。

结论

利用 UV Smart D60 的消毒方案与使用 Cidex OPA 的标准化学消毒方案同样有效。

证据水平

无。

喉镜,133:3512-3519,2023。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验