Siwe Hannah, Aerssens Annelies, Flour Mieke V, Ternest Silke, Van Simaey Leen, Verstraeten Duncan, Kalmar Alain F, Leroux-Roels Isabel, Meuleman Philip, Cools Piet
Laboratory of Liver Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, entrance 38, Medical Research Building 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Research and Development, eLEDricity, Hundelgemsesteenweg 446A, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 2;10(17):e37281. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37281. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
Despite the many guidelines for reprocessing of medical instruments, challenges persist such as microbial resistance to biocides, corrosive effects on materials, and time-consuming reprocessing procedures. Ultraviolet (UV) C light-emitting diode (LED) chambers might provide a solution but the integration in healthcare is still in its infancy. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of a novel ZAPARAY UVC LED chamber as a time and energy-efficient alternative for reprocessing of medical instruments for which current disinfection protocols exhibit limitations.
We verified the disinfection efficacy of the UVC LED chamber on a Petri dish and contaminated several medical devices with ATCC 25923. The bacterial reduction was assessed after 5 min of UVC LED exposure. Additionally, we investigated the impact of rinsing before UVC exposure.
We demonstrated a bacterial reduction of 9 log on a Petri dish. Non-rinsed dental tools exhibited varied reduction levels ranging from a 3.23 log to a 6.25 log reduction. Rinsing alone yielded an average reduction of 2.7 log and additional UVC exposure further reduced the bacterial load by an average of 3.65 log. We showed an average 4.90 log reduction on thermistors, 2 log or less on orthodontic pliers, and no reduction on handpieces.
This study demonstrates that UVC LED chambers may be used as a standardized substitute for specific (manual) disinfection procedures of certain medical devices, offering a time-efficient and more sustainable alternative. However, its use should be preceded by efficacy testing for each specific type of instrument.
尽管有许多关于医疗器械再处理的指南,但仍存在诸多挑战,如微生物对杀菌剂产生抗性、对材料的腐蚀作用以及耗时的再处理程序。紫外线(UV)C发光二极管(LED)消毒箱可能提供一种解决方案,但在医疗保健领域的应用仍处于起步阶段。在此,我们评估了一种新型ZAPARAY UVC LED消毒箱作为一种省时节能的替代方案,用于对当前消毒方案存在局限性的医疗器械进行再处理。
我们在培养皿上验证了UVC LED消毒箱的消毒效果,并用ATCC 25923污染了几种医疗设备。在UVC LED照射5分钟后评估细菌减少情况。此外,我们还研究了UVC照射前冲洗的影响。
我们在培养皿上证明了细菌减少9个对数。未冲洗的牙科工具的减少水平各不相同,从减少3.23个对数到减少6.25个对数不等。仅冲洗平均减少2.7个对数,额外的UVC照射进一步使细菌载量平均减少3.65个对数。我们在热敏电阻上显示平均减少4.90个对数,在正畸钳上减少2个对数或更少,在手机上没有减少。
本研究表明,UVC LED消毒箱可作为某些医疗器械特定(手动)消毒程序的标准化替代方案,提供一种省时且更具可持续性的选择。然而,在使用前应对每种特定类型的器械进行效果测试。