The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY.
Crit Care Med. 2023 Nov 1;51(11):1552-1565. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005967. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
To describe the factors affecting critical care capacity and how critical care organizations (CCOs) within academic centers in the U.S. flow-size critical care resources under normal operations, strain, and surge conditions.
PubMed, federal agency and American Hospital Association reports, and previous CCO survey results were reviewed.
Studies and reports of critical care bed capacity and utilization within CCOs and in the United States were selected.
The Academic Leaders in the Critical Care Medicine Task Force established regular conference calls to reach a consensus on the approach of CCOs to "flow-sizing" critical care services.
The approach of CCOs to "flow-sizing" critical care is outlined. The vertical (relation to institutional resources, e.g., space allocation, equipment, personnel redistribution) and horizontal (interdepartmental, e.g., emergency department, operating room, inpatient floors) integration of critical care delivery (ICUs, rapid response) for healthcare organizations and the methods by which CCOs flow-size critical care during normal operations, strain, and surge conditions are described. The advantages, barriers, and recommendations for the rapid and efficient scaling of critical care operations via a CCO structure are explained. Comprehensive guidance and resources for the development of "flow-sizing" capability by a CCO within a healthcare organization are provided.
We identified and summarized the fundamental principles affecting critical care capacity. The taskforce highlighted the advantages of the CCO governance model to achieve rapid and cost-effective "flow-sizing" of critical care services and provide recommendations and resources to facilitate this capability. The relevance of a comprehensive approach to "flow-sizing" has become particularly relevant in the wake of the latest COVID-19 pandemic. In light of the growing risks of another extreme epidemic, planning for adequate capacity to confront the next critical care crisis is urgent.
描述影响重症监护能力的因素,以及美国学术中心内的重症监护组织 (CCO) 在正常运营、紧张和激增情况下如何调配重症监护资源。
通过 PubMed、联邦机构和美国医院协会的报告,以及之前的 CCO 调查结果进行了回顾。
选择了关于 CCO 内和美国的重症监护床位容量和利用情况的研究和报告。
重症监护医学学术领袖工作组通过定期召开电话会议,就 CCO 对“流量大小”重症监护服务的方法达成共识。
概述了 CCO 对“流量大小”重症监护的方法。描述了医疗保健组织中重症监护服务(包括 ICU 和快速反应)的垂直(与机构资源的关系,例如空间分配、设备、人员重新分配)和水平(部门间,例如急诊、手术室、住院病房)整合,以及 CCO 在正常运营、紧张和激增情况下对重症监护进行流量调整的方法。解释了通过 CCO 结构快速有效地扩展重症监护业务的优势、障碍和建议。为医疗保健组织内的 CCO 发展“流量大小”能力提供了综合指导和资源。
我们确定并总结了影响重症监护能力的基本原则。工作组强调了 CCO 治理模式在实现重症监护服务的快速和具有成本效益的“流量大小”调整方面的优势,并提出了建议和资源,以促进这一能力。全面的“流量大小”方法的相关性在最近的 COVID-19 大流行后变得尤为重要。鉴于另一次极端疫情的风险不断增加,规划足够的能力来应对下一次重症监护危机迫在眉睫。