• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经患者驾驶适能评估中注视时间的有效性。

Effectiveness of a time to fixate for fitness to drive evaluation in neurological patients.

机构信息

University of Belgrade - School of Electrical Engineering, Bulevar kralja Aleksandra 73, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška cesta 25, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4277-4292. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02177-3. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-023-02177-3
PMID:37488465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11289031/
Abstract

We present a method to automatically calculate time to fixate (TTF) from the eye-tracker data in subjects with neurological impairment using a driving simulator. TTF presents the time interval for a person to notice the stimulus from its first occurrence. Precisely, we measured the time since the children started to cross the street until the drivers directed their look to the children. From 108 neurological patients recruited for the study, the analysis of TTF was performed in 56 patients to assess fit-, unfit-, and conditionally-fit-to-drive patients. The results showed that the proposed method based on the YOLO (you only look once) object detector is efficient for computing TTFs from the eye-tracker data. We obtained discriminative results for fit-to-drive patients by application of Tukey's honest significant difference post hoc test (p < 0.01), while no difference was observed between conditionally-fit and unfit-to-drive groups (p = 0.542). Moreover, we show that time-to-collision (TTC), initial gaze distance (IGD) from pedestrians, and speed at the hazard onset did not influence the result, while the only significant interaction is among fitness, IGD, and TTC on TTF. Obtained TTFs are also compared with the perception response times (PRT) calculated independently from eye-tracker data and YOLO. Although we reached statistically significant results that speak in favor of possible method application for assessment of fitness to drive, we provide detailed directions for future driving simulation-based evaluation and propose processing workflow to secure reliable TTF calculation and its possible application in for example psychology and neuroscience.

摘要

我们提出了一种使用驾驶模拟器从神经损伤患者的眼动追踪数据中自动计算注视时间(TTF)的方法。TTF 表示人从首次出现刺激到注意到刺激的时间间隔。具体来说,我们测量了儿童开始过马路到驾驶员将目光转向儿童的时间间隔。在为该研究招募的 108 名神经患者中,对 56 名患者进行了 TTF 分析,以评估适合、不适合和有条件适合驾驶的患者。结果表明,基于 YOLO(你只需看一次)目标探测器的提出方法可有效地从眼动追踪数据中计算 TTF。通过应用 Tukey 的诚实显著差异事后检验(p < 0.01),我们获得了适合驾驶患者的有区别的结果,而在有条件适合和不适合驾驶的患者之间没有观察到差异(p = 0.542)。此外,我们表明,碰撞时间(TTC)、行人初始注视距离(IGD)和危险发生时的速度不会影响结果,而唯一的显著交互作用是在 TTF 中存在 FIT、IGD 和 TTC 之间的交互作用。获得的 TTF 还与独立于眼动追踪数据和 YOLO 计算的感知反应时间(PRT)进行了比较。尽管我们取得了具有统计学意义的结果,表明该方法可能适用于评估驾驶能力,但我们提供了详细的驾驶模拟评估方向,并提出了处理工作流程,以确保可靠的 TTF 计算及其在心理学和神经科学等领域的可能应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0493/11289031/e58c76c9fd9f/13428_2023_2177_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0493/11289031/a78319b9e2e9/13428_2023_2177_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0493/11289031/8268800b4a42/13428_2023_2177_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0493/11289031/652ac05ea7d8/13428_2023_2177_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0493/11289031/d0a9c5a632d5/13428_2023_2177_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0493/11289031/e58c76c9fd9f/13428_2023_2177_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0493/11289031/a78319b9e2e9/13428_2023_2177_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0493/11289031/8268800b4a42/13428_2023_2177_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0493/11289031/652ac05ea7d8/13428_2023_2177_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0493/11289031/d0a9c5a632d5/13428_2023_2177_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0493/11289031/e58c76c9fd9f/13428_2023_2177_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a time to fixate for fitness to drive evaluation in neurological patients.神经患者驾驶适能评估中注视时间的有效性。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Aug;56(5):4277-4292. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02177-3. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
Exploring driving characteristics of fit- and unfit-to-drive neurological patients: a driving simulator study.探索适合和不适合驾驶的神经疾病患者的驾驶特征:驾驶模拟器研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(6):359-364. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1764547. Epub 2020 May 18.
3
[Fitness-to-drive assessment in drivers with neurological and neuromuscular disorders at the driving test centres].[在驾驶考试中心对患有神经和神经肌肉疾病的驾驶员进行的驾驶适宜性评估]
Rev Neurol. 2007;45(9):526-31.
4
Driving with Glaucoma: Task Performance and Gaze Movements.青光眼患者驾车:任务表现与注视运动
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Nov;92(11):1037-46. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000702.
5
An analysis of the suitability of a low-cost eye tracker for assessing the cognitive load of drivers.低成本眼动仪评估驾驶员认知负荷的适用性分析。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Apr;68:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
6
Blur, eye movements and performance on a driving visual recognition slide test.视力模糊、眼球运动与驾驶视觉识别幻灯片测试的表现
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015 Sep;35(5):522-9. doi: 10.1111/opo.12230. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
7
Assessing fitness to drive-A validation study on patients with mild cognitive impairment.评估驾驶适宜性——一项针对轻度认知障碍患者的验证性研究
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Feb 17;18(2):145-149. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1232809. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
8
Acute methamphetamine and alcohol usage alters gaze behaviour during driving: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.急性吸食冰毒和饮酒会改变驾驶时的注视行为:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Psychopharmacol. 2024 Jul;38(7):636-646. doi: 10.1177/02698811241261024. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
9
Driver eye movements in relation to unfamiliar traffic signs: An eye tracking study.驾驶员对不熟悉交通标志的眼动研究:一项眼动追踪研究。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Nov;89:103191. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103191. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
10
Landscape heritage objects' effect on driving: a combined driving simulator and questionnaire study.景观遗产对驾驶的影响:一项结合驾驶模拟器和问卷调查的研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jan;62:168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring driving characteristics of fit- and unfit-to-drive neurological patients: a driving simulator study.探索适合和不适合驾驶的神经疾病患者的驾驶特征:驾驶模拟器研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(6):359-364. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1764547. Epub 2020 May 18.
2
The impact of slippage on the data quality of head-worn eye trackers.头戴式眼动仪中滑动对数据质量的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1140-1160. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01307-0.
3
Driving in the elderly in health and disease.老年人健康与疾病状态下的驾驶情况
Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;167:563-573. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804766-8.00031-5.
4
Eye tracking in developmental cognitive neuroscience - The good, the bad and the ugly.发展认知神经科学中的眼动追踪——有好有坏有丑。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Dec;40:100710. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100710. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
5
Threats to the validity of eye-movement research in psychology.心理学中眼动研究的有效性威胁。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Aug;50(4):1645-1656. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0998-z.
6
Creating pedestrian crash scenarios in a driving simulator environment.在驾驶模拟器环境中创建行人碰撞场景。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 1:S12-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1015001.
7
An adaptive algorithm for fixation, saccade, and glissade detection in eyetracking data.眼动追踪数据中注视、眼跳和滑行检测的自适应算法。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Feb;42(1):188-204. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.188.
8
Comprehensive driving assessment: neuropsychological testing and on-road evaluation of brain injured patients.综合驾驶评估:脑损伤患者的神经心理学测试及上路评估
Scand J Psychol. 2000 Jun;41(2):113-21. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00179.
9
Perception-response time to unexpected roadway hazards.对意外道路危险的感知-反应时间。
Hum Factors. 1986 Feb;28(1):91-6. doi: 10.1177/001872088602800110.
10
Response time of stroke patients to a visual stimulus.
Stroke. 1988 Mar;19(3):335-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.3.335.