Hayakawa Mineji, Tagami Takashi, Kudo Daisuke, Ono Kota, Aoki Makoto, Endo Akira, Yumoto Tetsuya, Matsumura Yosuke, Irino Shiho, Sekine Kazuhiko, Ushio Noritaka, Ogura Takayuki, Nachi Sho, Irie Yuhei, Hayakawa Katsura, Ito Yusuke, Okishio Yuko, Muronoi Tomohiro, Kosaki Yoshinori, Ito Kaori, Nakatsutsumi Keita, Kondo Yutaka, Ueda Taichiro, Fukuma Hiroshi, Saisaka Yuichi, Tominaga Naoki, Kurita Takeo, Nakayama Fumihiko, Shibata Tomotaka, Kushimoto Shigeki
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, N14W5 Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8648, Japan.
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.
J Intensive Care. 2023 Jul 24;11(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00682-3.
The efficacies of fresh frozen plasma and coagulation factor transfusion have been widely evaluated in trauma-induced coagulopathy management during the acute post-injury phase. However, the efficacy of red blood cell transfusion has not been adequately investigated in patients with severe trauma, and the optimal hemoglobin target level during the acute post-injury and resuscitation phases remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether a restrictive transfusion strategy was clinically non-inferior to a liberal transfusion strategy during the acute post-injury phase.
This cluster-randomized, crossover, non-inferiority multicenter trial was conducted at 22 tertiary emergency medical institutions in Japan and included adult patients with severe trauma at risk of major bleeding. The institutions were allocated a restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy (target hemoglobin levels: 7-9 or 10-12 g/dL, respectively). The strategies were applied to patients immediately after arrival at the emergency department. The primary outcome was 28-day survival after arrival at the emergency department. Secondary outcomes included transfusion volume, complication rates, and event-free days. The non-inferiority margin was set at 3%.
The 28-day survival rates of patients in the restrictive (n = 216) and liberal (n = 195) strategy groups were 92.1% and 91.3%, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for 28-day survival in the restrictive versus liberal strategy group was 1.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-2.13). Significant non-inferiority was not observed. Transfusion volumes and hemoglobin levels were lower in the restrictive strategy group than in the liberal strategy group. No between-group differences were noted in complication rates or event-free days.
Although non-inferiority of the restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for 28-day survival was not statistically significant, the mortality and complication rates were similar between the groups. The restrictive transfusion strategy results in a lower transfusion volume.
umin.ac.jp/ctr: UMIN000034405, registration date: 8 October 2018.
在创伤后急性期创伤性凝血病的管理中,新鲜冰冻血浆和凝血因子输注的疗效已得到广泛评估。然而,严重创伤患者红细胞输注的疗效尚未得到充分研究,创伤后急性期和复苏期的最佳血红蛋白目标水平仍不明确。因此,本研究旨在探讨在创伤后急性期,限制性输血策略在临床上是否不劣于宽松输血策略。
本集群随机、交叉、非劣效性多中心试验在日本22家三级急诊医疗机构开展,纳入有大出血风险的成年严重创伤患者。各机构被分配采用限制性或宽松输血策略(目标血红蛋白水平分别为7 - 9或10 - 12 g/dL)。这些策略在患者抵达急诊科后立即应用于患者。主要结局是抵达急诊科后28天的生存率。次要结局包括输血量、并发症发生率和无事件天数。非劣效性界值设定为3%。
限制性策略组(n = 216)和宽松策略组(n = 195)患者的28天生存率分别为92.1%和91.3%。限制性策略组与宽松策略组2天生存的校正比值比为1.02(95%置信区间:0.49 - 2.13)。未观察到显著的非劣效性。限制性策略组的输血量和血红蛋白水平低于宽松策略组。两组在并发症发生率或无事件天数方面未观察到组间差异。
尽管限制性与宽松输血策略在28天生存方面的非劣效性无统计学意义,但两组的死亡率和并发症发生率相似。限制性输血策略导致较低的输血量。
umin.ac.jp/ctr: UMIN000034405,注册日期:2018年10月8日。