• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国社会经济地位和生活方式因素对癌症的单独和联合影响。

Individual and joint effect of socioeconomic status and lifestyle factors on cancer in Korea.

机构信息

Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.

National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(16):17389-17402. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6359. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.6359
PMID:37489083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10501257/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence on the individual and joint effect of socioeconomic status (SES) and unhealthy lifestyle on cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effects of these factors on cancer incidence and mortality.

METHODS

In this population-based cohort study, income was used as the proxy of SES. A combined unhealthy lifestyle score was obtained using data on smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and body mass index. Hazard ratios were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The study included data on 8,353,169 participants (median follow-up period, 17 years). Although the association between low income and cancer incidence varied depending on cancer type, low income consistently increased the risk of cancer-related death with a social gradient. Unhealthy behaviors increased the risk of cancer incidence and mortality, except for thyroid and breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men. Compared with the wealthiest and healthiest individuals, the poorest and unhealthiest men and women showed 2.1-fold (2.05-2.14) and 1.36-fold (1.31-1.41) higher risk of cancer-related death, respectively. The joint effect was most robust for lung, liver, head, and neck cancers in men and liver and cervical cancers in women; further, the effect was stronger with cancer-specific mortality than with incidence.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, income and combined healthy lifestyle behaviors have individual and joint effects on cancer incidence and mortality. The effect varies by cancer type and sex.

摘要

背景

关于社会经济地位(SES)和不健康生活方式对癌症的单独和联合影响,证据有限。因此,本研究旨在探讨这些因素对癌症发病率和死亡率的影响。

方法

在这项基于人群的队列研究中,收入被用作 SES 的代表。通过吸烟、饮酒、身体活动和体重指数的数据获得了一个综合的不健康生活方式评分。使用 Cox 比例风险模型估计了风险比。

结果

本研究纳入了 8353169 名参与者的数据(中位随访期为 17 年)。尽管低收入与癌症发病率之间的关联因癌症类型而异,但低收入始终与癌症相关的死亡风险增加存在社会梯度。不健康的行为增加了癌症发病率和死亡率的风险,但女性的甲状腺癌和乳腺癌以及男性的前列腺癌除外。与最富有和最健康的个体相比,最贫穷和最不健康的男性和女性的癌症相关死亡风险分别高出 2.1 倍(2.05-2.14)和 1.36 倍(1.31-1.41)。这种联合作用在男性的肺癌、肝癌、头颈部癌症和女性的肝癌和宫颈癌中最为显著;此外,与癌症发病率相比,这种作用在癌症特异性死亡率方面更强。

结论

总之,收入和综合健康的生活方式行为对癌症的发病率和死亡率有单独和联合的影响。这种影响因癌症类型和性别而异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8c/10501257/90ca0a1f8db7/CAM4-12-17389-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8c/10501257/3c73fcd6a5d3/CAM4-12-17389-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8c/10501257/1539d94664ce/CAM4-12-17389-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8c/10501257/20e9af2dd9ff/CAM4-12-17389-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8c/10501257/90ca0a1f8db7/CAM4-12-17389-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8c/10501257/3c73fcd6a5d3/CAM4-12-17389-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8c/10501257/1539d94664ce/CAM4-12-17389-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8c/10501257/20e9af2dd9ff/CAM4-12-17389-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee8c/10501257/90ca0a1f8db7/CAM4-12-17389-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual and joint effect of socioeconomic status and lifestyle factors on cancer in Korea.韩国社会经济地位和生活方式因素对癌症的单独和联合影响。
Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(16):17389-17402. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6359. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
Unhealthy lifestyles do not mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and incident depressive symptoms: the Health ABC study.不健康的生活方式不能调节社会经济地位与抑郁症状发生之间的关系:健康老龄化研究。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;21(7):664-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
3
Association of Socioeconomic Status and a Broad Combination of Lifestyle Factors With Adult-Onset Asthma: A Cohort Study.社会经济地位与广泛的生活方式因素组合与成人哮喘发病的相关性:一项队列研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Aug;12(8):2066-2073. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.04.009. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
The effect of socioeconomic deprivation on the association between an extended measurement of unhealthy lifestyle factors and health outcomes: a prospective analysis of the UK Biobank cohort.社会经济剥夺对不健康生活方式因素的广泛测量与健康结果之间关联的影响:对英国生物库队列的前瞻性分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Dec;3(12):e576-e585. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30200-7. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
5
Neighborhood and Individual Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Survival Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Common Cancers.社区和个体社会经济劣势与非转移性常见癌症患者的生存。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2139593. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.39593.
6
Effects of a combined lifestyle score on 10-year mortality in Korean men and women: a prospective cohort study.生活方式综合评分对韩国男女 10 年死亡率的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 20;12:673. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-673.
7
Lifestyle risk score and mortality in Korean adults: a population-based cohort study.生活方式风险评分与韩国成年人的死亡率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 24;10(1):10260. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66742-y.
8
Differential patterns of lifestyle behaviors among low- and high-income postmenopausal women in Korea: a latent class analysis.韩国低、高收入绝经后妇女生活方式行为的差异模式:潜在类别分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Nov 18;23(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02767-5.
9
Social Inequities in the Survival of Liver Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea, 2007-2017.社会不平等对肝癌生存率的影响:韩国 2007-2017 年全国队列研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Apr 1;39(12):e130. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e130.
10
Associations of Socioeconomic Status and Healthy Lifestyle With Incidence of Dyslipidemia: A Prospective Chinese Governmental Employee Cohort Study.社会经济地位和健康生活方式与血脂异常发生率的关联:一项前瞻性的中国政府雇员队列研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:878126. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.878126. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Lung Cancer Risk in Female School Cooks: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in the Republic of Korea.韩国女校厨患肺癌风险:一项全国性回顾性队列研究
Saf Health Work. 2025 Mar;16(1):105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2025.01.002. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
2
The influence of socioeconomic status on the association between unhealthy lifestyle factors and adverse health outcomes: a systematic review.社会经济地位对不健康生活方式因素与不良健康结局之间关联的影响:一项系统综述
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Dec 8;8:55. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18708.2. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Income Disparity in Breast Cancer Incidence and Stage at Presentation: A National Population Study of South Korea.乳腺癌发病时的收入差距与分期:韩国全国人口研究
J Breast Cancer. 2022 Oct;25(5):415-424. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e38. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
2
Income-based disparities in the risk of distant-stage cervical cancer and 5-year mortality after the introduction of a National Cancer Screening Program in Korea.韩国国家癌症筛查计划实施后,基于收入的宫颈癌远处转移风险和 5 年死亡率的差异。
Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022066. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2022066. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
3
The 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Score and Cancer Risk: A Longitudinal Analysis in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.
2018 年世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所评分与癌症风险:NIH-AARP 饮食与健康研究中的纵向分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Oct 4;31(10):1983-1992. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0044.
4
Life-course income trajectories of men and women in Norway: implications for self-rated health in later life.挪威男女的一生收入轨迹:对晚年自评健康的影响。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;32(4):542-547. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac055.
5
Understanding and Utilizing Claim Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and Health Insurance Review & Assessment (HIRA) Database for Research.理解并利用韩国国民健康保险服务(NHIS)和健康保险审查与评估(HIRA)数据库中的理赔数据进行研究。
J Lipid Atheroscler. 2022 May;11(2):103-110. doi: 10.12997/jla.2022.11.2.103. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
6
Income Disparities in Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-2019.癌症筛查中的收入差距:2013-2019 年韩国国家健康和营养检查调查的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;10:820643. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.820643. eCollection 2022.
7
Adherence to Cancer Prevention Guidelines and Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Population-Based Cohort Study.癌症预防指南的遵循情况与癌症发病率和死亡率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan;55(1):15-27. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.1031. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
8
Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2019.韩国癌症统计数据:2019 年的发病率、死亡率、生存率和流行率。
Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Apr;54(2):330-344. doi: 10.4143/crt.2022.128. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
9
The impact of current smoking, regular drinking, and physical inactivity on health care-seeking behavior in China.当前吸烟、有规律的饮酒和身体活动不足对中国卫生保健寻求行为的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07462-z.
10
Adherence to Healthy Lifestyle and Liver cancer in Chinese: a prospective cohort study of 0.5 million people.中文人群中坚持健康生活方式与肝癌的关系:一项涉及 50 万人的前瞻性队列研究。
Br J Cancer. 2022 Mar;126(5):815-821. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01645-x. Epub 2021 Dec 1.