• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算加速审批药物确证性试验的潜在获益:综合信息价值框架。

Estimating the Potential Benefits of Confirmatory Trials for Drugs with Accelerated Approval: A Comprehensive Value of Information Framework.

机构信息

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 90 Smith St, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Dec;41(12):1617-1627. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01303-5. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-023-01303-5
PMID:37490206
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration's Accelerated Approval (AA) policy provides a pathway for patients to access potentially life-saving drugs rapidly. However, the use of surrogate endpoints, single-arm designs, and small sample sizes in preliminary trials that support AAs can lead to uncertainty regarding the clinical benefits of such drugs. This study aims to develop a comprehensive value of information (VOI) framework for assessing the potential benefits of future confirmatory trials, accounting for the various uncertainties inherent in preliminary trials.

METHODS

I formulated an expected value of information from confirmatory trial (EVICT) metric, which evaluates the potential benefits of a confirmatory trial that would reduce those uncertainties by using a clinically meaningful endpoint, a randomized control, and increased sample size. The EVICT metric can quantify the expected benefits of a well-designed confirmatory trial or an inadequately designed one that continues to use surrogate endpoints or single-arm design. The framework was illustrated using a hypothetical AA drug for metastatic breast cancer.

RESULTS

The case study demonstrates that a highly uncertain preliminary trial of an AA drug was associated with a substantial EVICT. A confirmatory trial with an increased sample size for this AA drug, utilizing a clinically meaningful endpoint and randomized control, yielded a population-level EVICT of $12.6 million. Persistently using a surrogate endpoint and single-arm trial design would reduce the EVICT by 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

This framework can provide accurate VOI estimates to guide coverage policies, value-based pricing, and the design of confirmatory trials for AA drugs.

摘要

背景

美国食品和药物管理局的加速审批(AA)政策为患者提供了快速获得潜在救命药物的途径。然而,初步试验中使用替代终点、单臂设计和小样本量来支持 AA 会导致对这些药物的临床益处存在不确定性。本研究旨在开发一个全面的信息价值(VOI)框架,用于评估未来确证性试验的潜在获益,同时考虑到初步试验中固有的各种不确定性。

方法

我制定了一个从确证性试验中获得的信息价值的预期(EVICT)指标,该指标通过使用有临床意义的终点、随机对照和增加样本量来评估确证性试验减少这些不确定性的潜在获益。EVICT 指标可以量化精心设计的确证性试验或继续使用替代终点或单臂设计的设计不佳的确证性试验的预期获益。该框架使用转移性乳腺癌的假设 AA 药物进行了说明。

结果

案例研究表明,AA 药物的高度不确定的初步试验与大量的 EVICT 相关。对于该 AA 药物,增加样本量的、使用有临床意义的终点和随机对照的确证性试验,产生了 1260 万美元的人群水平 EVICT。持续使用替代终点和单臂试验设计会将 EVICT 降低 60%。

结论

该框架可以提供准确的 VOI 估计值,以指导 AA 药物的覆盖政策、基于价值的定价和确证性试验的设计。

相似文献

1
Estimating the Potential Benefits of Confirmatory Trials for Drugs with Accelerated Approval: A Comprehensive Value of Information Framework.估算加速审批药物确证性试验的潜在获益:综合信息价值框架。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Dec;41(12):1617-1627. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01303-5. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.具有不确定治疗价值的癌症药物的批准:欧洲和美国的监管决策比较。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1219-1256. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
Characteristics of Clinical Trials for the US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval and Subsequent Confirmatory Trials: Implications for Drug Approval in Japan.美国食品和药物管理局加速批准临床试验和后续确证性临床试验的特征:对日本药物批准的影响。
Biol Pharm Bull. 2024;47(7):1345-1349. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b24-00324.
4
Characteristics of Anticancer Drugs Approved Under the Accelerated Approval Program in the US: Success or Failure in Converting to Regular Approval.美国加速批准程序下批准的抗癌药物的特点:转换为常规批准的成败。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Mar;58(2):387-394. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00607-0. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
5
Assessment of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Receiving Accelerated Approval.加速批准的癌症药物的临床获益评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):906-913. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0462.
6
Strength of clinical evidence supporting the United States Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approvals from 2015 to 2022.支持美国食品药品监督管理局2015年至2022年加速批准的临床证据强度。
BMC Med. 2024 Dec 18;22(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03800-6.
7
Factors in Time to Full Approval or Withdrawal for Anticancer Medicines Granted Accelerated Approval by the FDA.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)加速批准的抗癌药物完全获批或撤回所需时间的影响因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252026. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2026.
8
Spending by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Before and After Confirmation of Benefit for Drugs Granted US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval, 2012 to 2017.2012 年至 2017 年,美国食品和药物管理局加速批准药物前后,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的支出情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 May 27;3(5):e221158. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1158. eCollection 2022 May.
9
Proposed study designs for approval based on a surrogate endpoint and a post-marketing confirmatory study under FDA's accelerated approval regulations for disease modifying osteoarthritis drugs.基于替代终点和上市后确证研究的 FDA 加速批准治疗骨关节炎疾病的药物的研究设计方案。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Apr;27(4):571-579. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
10
Medicaid and Accelerated Approval: Spending on Drugs with and without Proven Clinical Benefits.医疗补助和加速审批:有和没有经过临床验证的药物的支出。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2022 Dec 1;47(6):673-690. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10041107.

引用本文的文献

1
Moving Forward with Taking a Societal Perspective: A Themed Issue on Productivity Costs, Consumption Costs and Informal Care Costs.从社会视角出发继续前行:关于生产力成本、消费成本和非正式护理成本的专题文章
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Sep;41(9):1027-1030. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01307-1. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Correction: Belimumab for Treating Active Autoantibody‑Positive Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.更正:贝利尤单抗治疗活动性自身抗体阳性系统性红斑狼疮:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所单一技术评估证据审查小组观点
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Nov;41(11):1551. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01315-1.
2
How are health technology assessment bodies responding to the assessment challenges posed by cell and gene therapy?健康技术评估机构如何应对细胞和基因治疗带来的评估挑战?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 13;23(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09494-5.
3
Use of Single-Arm Trials for US Food and Drug Administration Drug Approval in Oncology, 2002-2021.
2002-2021 年美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)在肿瘤学中批准药物使用单臂试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;9(2):266-272. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5985.
4
A framework for assessing the impact of accelerated approval.评估加速审批影响的框架。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0265712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265712. eCollection 2022.
5
Medicare Spending on Drugs With Accelerated Approval.医疗保险对加速审批药物的支出。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jul;175(7):938-944. doi: 10.7326/M21-4442. Epub 2022 May 24.
6
Single-arm clinical trials that supported FDA accelerated approvals have modest effect sizes and were at high risk of bias.支持 FDA 加速批准的单臂临床试验具有适度的效应量,且存在较高的偏倚风险。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;148:193-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
Raising Medicaid Rebates For Drugs With Accelerated Approval.提高有加速审批药物的医疗补助回扣。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Dec;40(12):1935-1942. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00762.
8
Comparison of Duration of Postapproval vs Pivotal Trials for Therapeutic Agents Granted US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval, 2009-2018.2009-2018 年获美国食品和药物管理局加速批准的治疗性药物的批准后试验与关键试验持续时间比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133601. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33601.
9
Fulfilling the Mandate of the US Food and Drug Administration's Accelerated Approval Pathway: The Need for Reforms.履行美国食品药品监督管理局加速批准途径的使命:改革的必要性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1275-1276. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4604.
10
Comparison of FDA accelerated vs regular pathway approvals for lung cancer treatments between 2006 and 2018.比较 2006 年至 2018 年期间肺癌治疗的 FDA 加速审批与常规审批路径。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 24;15(7):e0236345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236345. eCollection 2020.