Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy.
PLoS Biol. 2023 Jul 25;21(7):e3001930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001930. eCollection 2023 Jul.
We can sense an object's shape by vision or touch. Previous studies suggested that the inferolateral occipitotemporal cortex (ILOTC) implements supramodal shape representations as it responds more to seeing or touching objects than shapeless textures. However, such activation in the anterior portion of the ventral visual pathway could be due to the conceptual representation of an object or visual imagery triggered by touching an object. We addressed these possibilities by directly comparing shape and conceptual representations of objects in early blind (who lack visual experience/imagery) and sighted participants. We found that bilateral ILOTC in both groups showed stronger activation during a shape verification task than during a conceptual verification task made on the names of the same manmade objects. Moreover, the distributed activity in the ILOTC encoded shape similarity but not conceptual association among objects. Besides the ILOTC, we also found shape representation in both groups' bilateral ventral premotor cortices and intraparietal sulcus (IPS), a frontoparietal circuit relating to object grasping and haptic processing. In contrast, the conceptual verification task activated both groups' left perisylvian brain network relating to language processing and, interestingly, the cuneus in early blind participants only. The ILOTC had stronger functional connectivity to the frontoparietal circuit than to the left perisylvian network, forming a modular structure specialized in shape representation. Our results conclusively support that the ILOTC selectively implements shape representation independently of visual experience, and this unique functionality likely comes from its privileged connection to the frontoparietal haptic circuit.
我们可以通过视觉或触觉感知物体的形状。先前的研究表明,下颞枕外侧区(ILOTC)实现了超模态形状表示,因为它对看到或触摸物体的反应比对无形状纹理的反应更强烈。然而,腹侧视觉通路前部的这种激活可能是由于对物体的概念表示或触摸物体引发的视觉意象。我们通过直接比较早期失明(缺乏视觉体验/意象)和视力正常的参与者对物体的形状和概念表示,解决了这些可能性。我们发现,两组的双侧 ILOTC 在进行形状验证任务时比进行相同人造物体名称的概念验证任务时表现出更强的激活。此外,ILOTC 中的分布式活动编码了形状相似性,但不编码物体之间的概念关联。除了 ILOTC,我们还在两组的双侧腹侧运动前皮质和顶内沟(IPS)中发现了形状表示,这是一个与物体抓取和触觉处理相关的额顶叶回路。相比之下,概念验证任务激活了两组与语言处理相关的左侧颞旁脑网络,有趣的是,早期失明参与者的楔前叶只有。ILOTC 与额顶叶回路的功能连接比与左侧颞旁网络的功能连接更强,形成了一个专门用于形状表示的模块化结构。我们的研究结果明确支持 ILOTC 选择性地实现了独立于视觉体验的形状表示,而这种独特的功能可能来自于它与额顶叶触觉回路的特权连接。