Santiago Clayton P, Gimmen Megan Y, Lu Yuchen, McNally Minda M, Duncan Leighton H, Creamer Tyler J, Orzolek Linda D, Blackshaw Seth, Singh Mandeep S
Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 May 23;3(4):100335. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100335. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is the most common cause of failure of retinal reattachment surgery, and the molecular changes leading to this aberrant wound healing process are currently unknown. Our ultimate goal is to study PVR pathogenesis by employing single-cell transcriptomics to dissect cellular heterogeneity.
Here we aimed to compare single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing (snRNA-seq) of retinal PVR samples in the rabbit model.
Unilateral induction of PVR lesions in rabbit eyes with contralateral eyes serving as controls.
Proliferative vitreoretinopathy was induced unilaterally in Dutch Belted rabbits. At different timepoints after PVR induction, retinas were dissociated into either cells or nuclei suspension and processed for scRNA-seq or snRNA-seq.
Single cell and nuclei transcriptomic profiles of retinas after PVR induction.
Single-cell RNA sequencing and snRNA-seq were conducted on retinas at 4 hours and 14 days after disease induction. Although the capture rate of unique molecular identifiers and genes were greater in scRNA-seq samples, overall gene expression profiles of individual cell types were highly correlated between scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq. A major disparity between the 2 sequencing modalities was the cell type capture rate, however, with glial cell types overrepresented in scRNA-seq, and inner retinal neurons were enriched by snRNA-seq. Furthermore, fibrotic Müller glia were overrepresented in snRNA-seq samples, whereas reactive Müller glia were overrepresented in scRNA-seq samples. Trajectory analyses were similar between the 2 methods, allowing for the combined analysis of the scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq data sets.
These findings highlight limitations of both scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq analysis and imply that use of both techniques together can more accurately identify transcriptional networks critical for aberrant fibrogenesis in PVR than using either in isolation.
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
增殖性玻璃体视网膜病变(PVR)是视网膜复位手术失败的最常见原因,目前尚不清楚导致这种异常伤口愈合过程的分子变化。我们的最终目标是通过单细胞转录组学剖析细胞异质性来研究PVR的发病机制。
在此,我们旨在比较兔模型中视网膜PVR样本的单细胞RNA测序(scRNA-seq)和单核RNA测序(snRNA-seq)。
在兔眼中单侧诱导PVR病变,对侧眼作为对照。
在荷兰带兔中单侧诱导增殖性玻璃体视网膜病变。在PVR诱导后的不同时间点,将视网膜分离成细胞或细胞核悬液,并进行scRNA-seq或snRNA-seq处理。
PVR诱导后视网膜的单细胞和细胞核转录组图谱。
在疾病诱导后4小时和14天对视网膜进行单细胞RNA测序和snRNA-seq。尽管scRNA-seq样本中独特分子标识符和基因的捕获率更高,但scRNA-seq和snRNA-seq之间单个细胞类型的总体基因表达谱高度相关。然而,两种测序方式之间的一个主要差异是细胞类型捕获率,scRNA-seq中胶质细胞类型占比过高,而snRNA-seq中视网膜内层神经元富集。此外,纤维化的Müller胶质细胞在snRNA-seq样本中占比过高,而反应性Müller胶质细胞在scRNA-seq样本中占比过高。两种方法的轨迹分析相似,允许对scRNA-seq和snRNA-seq数据集进行联合分析。
这些发现突出了scRNA-seq和snRNA-seq分析的局限性,并表明与单独使用任何一种技术相比,同时使用这两种技术可以更准确地识别对PVR异常纤维生成至关重要的转录网络。
专有或商业披露可在参考文献之后找到。