• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响社会处方倡议的因素:定性证据的系统评价

Factors influencing social prescribing initiatives: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.

作者信息

Ebrahimoghli R, Pezeshki M Z, Farajzadeh P, Arab-Zozani M, Mehrtak M, Alizadeh M

机构信息

Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Department of Nursing, Institute of Health Education, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.

出版信息

Perspect Public Health. 2025 May;145(3):157-166. doi: 10.1177/17579139231184809. Epub 2023 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1177/17579139231184809
PMID:37497769
Abstract

AIMS

Social prescribing is a growing health policy agenda to improve the quality and effectiveness of health systems. However, systematically collected knowledge on factors influencing the effective implementation of SP is scarce. A systematic review was conducted to identify and categorize factors influencing social prescribing initiatives.

METHODS

A search of three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge) was carried out to retrieve studies from inception to May 2022, supplemented by grey literature searching and snowballing of the relevant references. The inclusion criteria were original empirical research, qualitative data collection, and a description of factors affecting social prescribing initiatives. Study quality was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. We categorized the results of individual studies using a narrative approach.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were included for analysis. Along with patient-related factors (patient-centeredness, clinical complexity, perception, knowledge), three main settings of social prescribing initiatives (including healthcare providers, link workers, and voluntary and community sectors) are affected by (1) individual characteristics (knowledge, perception, skill mix); (2) interpersonal relations (collaboration, trust, feedback, supportive climate, follow-up, sustained connection, peer support within and across sectors); (3) organizational contingencies (resource adequacy, staffing, training, role description, continuity of support, caseload management, monitoring, affordability, accessibility, referral criteria, and tailored support); and (4) political context (national policy and guidance, stewardship, planning, cocreation, bureaucracy, economic condition, and the number of support organizations).

CONCLUSION

Many factors influencing social prescribing initiatives were identified. The results of this review can be applied by different stakeholders of social prescribing to guide development, implementation, description, and evaluation.

摘要

目的

社会处方是一项日益重要的卫生政策议程,旨在提高卫生系统的质量和有效性。然而,关于影响社会处方有效实施的因素的系统收集的知识却很匮乏。本研究进行了一项系统评价,以识别和分类影响社会处方倡议的因素。

方法

检索了三个电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus和ISI Web of Knowledge),以检索从数据库建立到2022年5月的研究,并辅以灰色文献检索和相关参考文献的滚雪球法。纳入标准为原创实证研究、定性数据收集以及对影响社会处方倡议的因素的描述。使用批判性评估技能计划工具评估研究质量。我们采用叙述性方法对个体研究结果进行分类。

结果

共纳入23项研究进行分析。除了与患者相关的因素(以患者为中心、临床复杂性、认知、知识)外,社会处方倡议的三个主要环境(包括医疗保健提供者、联络人员以及志愿和社区部门)受到以下因素影响:(1)个体特征(知识、认知、技能组合);(2)人际关系(协作、信任、反馈、支持性氛围、随访、持续联系、部门内部和部门之间的同伴支持);(3)组织突发事件(资源充足性、人员配备、培训、角色描述、支持的连续性、工作量管理、监测、可承受性、可及性、转诊标准和量身定制的支持);以及(4)政治背景(国家政策和指导、管理、规划、共同创造、官僚作风、经济状况以及支持组织的数量)。

结论

确定了许多影响社会处方倡议的因素。本综述的结果可供社会处方的不同利益相关者应用,以指导发展、实施、描述和评估。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing social prescribing initiatives: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.影响社会处方倡议的因素:定性证据的系统评价
Perspect Public Health. 2025 May;145(3):157-166. doi: 10.1177/17579139231184809. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
4
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
5
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
6
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
7
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
8
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
9
Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement.青少年重复意外怀孕干预消除计划(INTERUPT):干预效果与成本效益的系统评价,以及实施因素和用户参与的定性与实在论综合分析
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(16):1-214. doi: 10.3310/hta20160.
10
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Connected Communities | Learning lessons from person-centred community-based support services' implementation: a mixed-methods study protocol.互联社区 | 从以个人为中心的社区支持服务实施中吸取经验教训:一项混合方法研究方案
NIHR Open Res. 2024 Nov 12;3:66. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13494.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Coproduction in Social Prescribing Initiatives: Protocol for a Scoping Review.社会处方倡议中的共同制定:范围综述议定书。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 17;13:e57062. doi: 10.2196/57062.
3
Service Providers' Perspectives of an Integrated Community Mental Health Service in the UK.
英国服务提供商对综合社区心理健康服务的看法。
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Feb;61(2):329-336. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01352-w. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
4
Implementing a social prescribing program in primary care units in Portugal: A qualitative study exploring enablers, barriers and lessons learned from the perspectives of stakeholders involved in the program implementation.在葡萄牙的基层医疗单位实施社会处方计划:一项从参与该计划实施的利益相关者角度探索促进因素、障碍和经验教训的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 28;19(6):e0306404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306404. eCollection 2024.
5
Addressing social determinants of health through customization: Quality improvement, telemedicine, and care coordination to serve immigrant families.通过定制化解决健康的社会决定因素:改善医疗质量、远程医疗和协调护理,为移民家庭提供服务。
J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2023;16(4):665-674. doi: 10.3233/PRM-230036.