• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联社区 | 从以个人为中心的社区支持服务实施中吸取经验教训:一项混合方法研究方案

Connected Communities | Learning lessons from person-centred community-based support services' implementation: a mixed-methods study protocol.

作者信息

Christian Danielle L, Berzins Kathryn, Weldon Jo C, Toma Madalina, Gabbay Mark, Watkins Caroline, Forder Julien

机构信息

Applied Health Research Hub (AHRh), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK.

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC-NWC), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK.

出版信息

NIHR Open Res. 2024 Nov 12;3:66. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13494.2. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13494.2
PMID:40012966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11863302/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Person-centred community-based support services (PCCBSS) are an array of non-clinical services provided by organisations such as NHS Trusts, voluntary sector organisations, or local authorities.All PCCBSS involve an individual (variously known as a 'social prescriber', 'link worker', 'signposter', 'navigator', 'connector' or 'neighbourhood coach') who talks with a service user before directing them to a range of relevant community sources of social, emotional, and practical support.Despite much recent investment in social prescribing, and its increased prominence within the policy context across England, little is understood about how PCCBSS are implemented. Research is required across different contexts to describe PCCBSS implementation; in particular, how social care providers successfully interact to support the implementation of PCCBSS, and how services responded to circumstances imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE

The aim of this post-implementation mixed-methods study is to explore how PCCBSS are implemented and become part of usual working practice. Using three services in North West England as case studies, we will examine factors influencing PCCBSS implementation and establish where there is learning for the wider adult social care system.

FOCUS

The study comprises two work packages (WPs):WP1: collecting data by reviewing service documents from three PCCBSS case studies;WP2: interviewing staff and service users (≤20 participants per PCCBSS);Key implementation data will be systematically abstracted (from WPs1&2) into a coding frame; combining contextual determinants from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) with process-related domains from Normalization Process Theory (NPT).

KEY OUTPUTS

The findings from WP1 and WP2 will be presented in the form of an illustrated 'pen portrait', developed collaboratively with Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast ARC NWC public advisers, to illustrate how implementation evolved for each of the PCCBSS across key time-points in the process (initiation; operation; maintenance). The findings will also inform an online implementation toolkit providing recommendations for setting up future PCCBSS.

摘要

背景

以个人为中心的社区支持服务(PCCBSS)是由诸如国民保健服务信托基金、志愿部门组织或地方当局等机构提供的一系列非临床服务。所有PCCBSS都涉及一名个人(有多种称呼,如“社会处方师”“联络工作者”“指路者”“导航员”“连接器”或“社区教练”),该个人在将服务使用者引导至一系列相关的社会、情感和实际支持的社区资源之前,会与服务使用者进行交谈。尽管最近对社会处方投入了大量资金,并且其在英格兰的政策背景下日益突出,但对于PCCBSS如何实施却知之甚少。需要在不同背景下进行研究以描述PCCBSS的实施情况;特别是社会护理提供者如何成功互动以支持PCCBSS的实施,以及服务如何应对新冠疫情带来的情况。

目的

这项实施后混合方法研究的目的是探索PCCBSS如何实施并成为日常工作实践的一部分。以英格兰西北部的三项服务为案例研究,我们将研究影响PCCBSS实施的因素,并确定哪些经验可供更广泛的成人社会护理系统借鉴。

重点

该研究包括两个工作包(WP):

工作包1:通过审查三个PCCBSS案例研究的服务文件来收集数据;

工作包2:采访工作人员和服务使用者(每个PCCBSS≤20名参与者);

关键实施数据将被系统地提炼(来自工作包1和2)到一个编码框架中;将实施研究综合框架(CFIR)中的背景决定因素与规范化过程理论(NPT)中与过程相关的领域相结合。

关键产出

工作包1和2的研究结果将以图文并茂的“人物简介”形式呈现,该简介是与西北海岸应用研究合作ARC NWC公共顾问合作编写的,以说明在过程中的关键时间点(启动;运营;维护)每个PCCBSS的实施情况如何演变。研究结果还将为一个在线实施工具包提供信息,该工具包为建立未来的PCCBSS提供建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c9/11863565/dd31ece28c6d/nihropenres-3-14992-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c9/11863565/dd31ece28c6d/nihropenres-3-14992-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/52c9/11863565/dd31ece28c6d/nihropenres-3-14992-g0000.jpg

相似文献

1
Connected Communities | Learning lessons from person-centred community-based support services' implementation: a mixed-methods study protocol.互联社区 | 从以个人为中心的社区支持服务实施中吸取经验教训:一项混合方法研究方案
NIHR Open Res. 2024 Nov 12;3:66. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13494.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Exploring voluntary sector specialist services for victim-survivors of sexual violence in England: the PROSPER co-production study.探索英格兰为性暴力受害者幸存者提供的志愿部门专业服务:PROSPER联合制作研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Apr;13(10):1-104. doi: 10.3310/WWKT3077.
3
Impact of a social prescribing intervention in North East England on adults with type 2 diabetes: the SPRING_NE multimethod study.英格兰东北部社会处方干预对 2 型糖尿病成人的影响:SPRING_NE 多方法研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Mar;11(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/AQXC8219.
4
The Resilience Hub approach for addressing mental health of health and social care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation.应对 COVID-19 大流行期间卫生和社会保健工作者心理健康问题的韧性中心方法:一项混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(29):1-164. doi: 10.3310/HGQR5133.
5
Understanding and using experiences of social care to guide service improvements: translating a co-design approach from health to social care.理解和利用社会关怀经验指导服务改进:将共同设计方法从卫生领域转化到社会关怀领域。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(27):1-84. doi: 10.3310/MYHT8970.
6
Consequences of how third sector organisations are commissioned in the NHS and local authorities in England: a mixed-methods study.英格兰国民保健制度和地方当局委托第三部门组织的后果:混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Oct;12(39):1-180. doi: 10.3310/NTDT7965.
7
The consequences of micro-discretions and boundaries in the social prescribing link worker role in England: a realist evaluation.英格兰社会处方联络工作人员角色中微观决策和界限的后果:一项实在论评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 11:1-17. doi: 10.3310/JSQY9840.
8
Improving support and planning ahead for older people with learning disabilities and family carers: a mixed-methods study.改善对有学习障碍的老年人及其家庭照顾者的支持与提前规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(16):1-161. doi: 10.3310/MTHW2644.
9
The SIMCA Study Protocol: Factors influencing the implementation of the Midwifery Continuity of Carer (MCoC) model of care in NHS maternity care in England: A mixed methods cross case analysis involving clinicians, women and policy makers.SIMCA研究方案:影响英格兰国民保健服务体系产科护理中助产士连续性照护(MCoC)模式实施的因素:一项涉及临床医生、产妇和政策制定者的混合方法跨案例分析
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 24;5:4. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13745.1. eCollection 2025.
10
Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.患者通过联络人员接受社会处方作为以患者为中心的护理的一部分:一项现实主义评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 25:1-17. doi: 10.3310/ETND8254.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing social prescribing initiatives: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.影响社会处方倡议的因素:定性证据的系统评价
Perspect Public Health. 2025 May;145(3):157-166. doi: 10.1177/17579139231184809. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
2
Establishing internationally accepted conceptual and operational definitions of social prescribing through expert consensus: a Delphi study.通过专家共识,为社会处方制定国际认可的概念和操作定义:德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e070184. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070184.
3
Establishing Internationally Accepted Conceptual and Operational Definitions of Social Prescribing Through Expert Consensus: A Delphi Study Protocol.
通过专家共识建立国际认可的社会处方概念和操作定义:一项德尔菲研究方案
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6984. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
4
Social Prescribing: Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Psychosocial Community Referral Interventions in Primary Care.社会处方:基层医疗中社会心理社区转诊干预效果的系统评价
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Aug 19;22(3):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6472. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
5
Social prescribing for older people and the role of the cultural sector during the COVID-19 pandemic: What are link workers' views and experiences?社交处方在老年人中的应用以及文化部门在 COVID-19 大流行期间的作用:联络工作者的观点和经验是什么?
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5305-e5313. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13949. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
6
Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development.实施评估和研究的转化框架:定性研究和仪器开发的规范化进程理论编码手册。
Implement Sci. 2022 Feb 22;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01191-x.
7
Understanding implementation context and social processes through integrating Normalization Process Theory (NPT) and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).通过整合规范化过程理论(NPT)和实施研究综合框架(CFIR)来理解实施背景和社会过程。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Feb 9;3(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00264-8.
8
Supporting Vulnerable Populations During the Pandemic: Stakeholders' Experiences and Perceptions of Social Prescribing in Scotland During Covid-19.大流行期间支持弱势群体:新冠疫情期间苏格兰社会处方利益相关者的经验和看法。
Qual Health Res. 2022 Mar;32(4):670-682. doi: 10.1177/10497323211064229. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
9
Health and wellbeing outcomes and social prescribing pathways in community-based support for autistic adults: A systematic mapping review of reviews.社区支持自闭症成年人的健康和福利结果及社会转介途径:系统综述的综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 May;30(3):e621-e635. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13635. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
10
What work is required to implement and sustain the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)? A qualitative study of NSQIP implementation in Alberta, Canada.实施和维持国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)需要做哪些工作?对加拿大艾伯塔省 NSQIP 实施情况的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 29;11(9):e044720. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044720.